Defining the function of OmpA in the Rcs stress response

  1. Kilian Dekoninck
  2. Juliette Létoquart
  3. Cédric Laguri
  4. Pascal Demange
  5. Robin Bevernaegie
  6. Jean-Pierre Simorre
  7. Olivia Dehu
  8. Bogdan I Iorga
  9. Benjamin Elias
  10. Seung-Hyun Cho  Is a corresponding author
  11. Jean-Francois Collet  Is a corresponding author
  1. Universite catholique de Louvain, Belgium
  2. Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, France
  3. Université Paul Sabatier, France
  4. Université Grenoble Alpes, France

Abstract

OmpA, a protein commonly found in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, has served as a paradigm for the study of b-barrel proteins for several decades. In Escherichia coli, OmpA was previously reported to form complexes with RcsF, a surface-exposed lipoprotein that triggers the Rcs stress response when damage occurs in the outer membrane and the peptidoglycan. How OmpA interacts with RcsF and whether this interaction allows RcsF to reach the surface has remained unclear. Here, we integrated in vivo and in vitro approaches to establish that RcsF interacts with the C-terminal, periplasmic domain of OmpA, not with the N-terminal b-barrel, thus implying that RcsF does not reach the bacterial surface via OmpA. Our results suggest a novel function for OmpA in the cell envelope: OmpA competes with the inner membrane protein IgaA, the downstream Rcs component, for RcsF binding across the periplasm, thereby regulating the Rcs response.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 3, 4A, 4B, 5B, 5D and 6 supplement 1.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kilian Dekoninck

    de Duve Institute, Universite catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5093-1343
  2. Juliette Létoquart

    de Duve Institute, Universite catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Cédric Laguri

    IBS, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Pascal Demange

    IPBS, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Robin Bevernaegie

    MOST, Universite catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1605-9253
  6. Jean-Pierre Simorre

    Institut de Biologie Structurale, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Olivia Dehu

    de Duve Institute, Universite catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Bogdan I Iorga

    de Duve Institute, Universite catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0392-1350
  9. Benjamin Elias

    MOST, Universite catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5037-3313
  10. Seung-Hyun Cho

    de Duve Institute, Universite catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
    For correspondence
    seung.cho@uclouvain.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5548-4239
  11. Jean-Francois Collet

    de Duve Institute, Universite catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
    For correspondence
    jean-francois.collet@uclouvain.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8069-7036

Funding

Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l'Industrie et dans l'Agriculture

  • Kilian Dekoninck
  • Robin Bevernaegie

Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS

  • Kilian Dekoninck
  • Juliette Létoquart
  • Robin Bevernaegie
  • Olivia Dehu
  • Benjamin Elias
  • Seung-Hyun Cho

FRFS-WELBIO

  • Jean-Francois Collet

FRISBI (ANR-10-INBS-05-02)

  • Cédric Laguri
  • Jean-Pierre Simorre

GRAL

  • Cédric Laguri
  • Jean-Pierre Simorre

CBH-EUR-GS (ANR-17-EURE-0003)

  • Cédric Laguri
  • Jean-Pierre Simorre

Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles (ARC 17/22-087)

  • Jean-Francois Collet

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Dekoninck et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,911
    views
  • 459
    downloads
  • 27
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kilian Dekoninck
  2. Juliette Létoquart
  3. Cédric Laguri
  4. Pascal Demange
  5. Robin Bevernaegie
  6. Jean-Pierre Simorre
  7. Olivia Dehu
  8. Bogdan I Iorga
  9. Benjamin Elias
  10. Seung-Hyun Cho
  11. Jean-Francois Collet
(2020)
Defining the function of OmpA in the Rcs stress response
eLife 9:e60861.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60861

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60861

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Mehak Zahoor Khan, Debbie M Hunt ... Vinay Kumar Nandicoori
    Research Article

    Mycobacterium tuberculosis’s (Mtb) autarkic lifestyle within the host involves rewiring its transcriptional networks to combat host-induced stresses. With the help of RNA sequencing performed under various stress conditions, we identified that genes belonging to Mtb sulfur metabolism pathways are significantly upregulated during oxidative stress. Using an integrated approach of microbial genetics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, animal experiments, chemical inhibition, and rescue studies, we investigated the biological role of non-canonical L-cysteine synthases, CysM and CysK2. While transcriptome signatures of RvΔcysM and RvΔcysK2 appear similar under regular growth conditions, we observed unique transcriptional signatures when subjected to oxidative stress. We followed pool size and labelling (34S) of key downstream metabolites, viz. mycothiol and ergothioneine, to monitor L-cysteine biosynthesis and utilization. This revealed the significant role of distinct L-cysteine biosynthetic routes on redox stress and homeostasis. CysM and CysK2 independently facilitate Mtb survival by alleviating host-induced redox stress, suggesting they are not fully redundant during infection. With the help of genetic mutants and chemical inhibitors, we show that CysM and CysK2 serve as unique, attractive targets for adjunct therapy to combat mycobacterial infection.

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Tingting Yang, Marko S Chavez ... Mohamed Y El-Naggar
    Research Article

    Filamentous multicellular cable bacteria perform centimeter-scale electron transport in a process that couples oxidation of an electron donor (sulfide) in deeper sediment to the reduction of an electron acceptor (oxygen or nitrate) near the surface. While this electric metabolism is prevalent in both marine and freshwater sediments, detailed electronic measurements of the conductivity previously focused on the marine cable bacteria (Candidatus Electrothrix), rather than freshwater cable bacteria, which form a separate genus (Candidatus Electronema) and contribute essential geochemical roles in freshwater sediments. Here, we characterize the electron transport characteristics of Ca. Electronema cable bacteria from Southern California freshwater sediments. Current–voltage measurements of intact cable filaments bridging interdigitated electrodes confirmed their persistent conductivity under a controlled atmosphere and the variable sensitivity of this conduction to air exposure. Electrostatic and conductive atomic force microscopies mapped out the characteristics of the cell envelope’s nanofiber network, implicating it as the conductive pathway in a manner consistent with previous findings in marine cable bacteria. Four-probe measurements of microelectrodes addressing intact cables demonstrated nanoampere currents up to 200 μm lengths at modest driving voltages, allowing us to quantify the nanofiber conductivity at 0.1 S/cm for freshwater cable bacteria filaments under our measurement conditions. Such a high conductivity can support the remarkable sulfide-to-oxygen electrical currents mediated by cable bacteria in sediments. These measurements expand the knowledgebase of long-distance electron transport to the freshwater niche while shedding light on the underlying conductive network of cable bacteria.