Reprogramming of bone marrow myeloid progenitor cells in patients with severe coronary artery disease

  1. Marlies Noz
  2. Siroon Bekkering
  3. Laszlo Groh
  4. Tim Nielen
  5. Evert Lamfers
  6. Andreas Schlitzer
  7. Saloua El Messaoudi
  8. Niels van Royen
  9. Erik Huys
  10. Frank Preijers
  11. Esther Smeets
  12. Erik Aarntzen
  13. Bowen Zhang
  14. Yang Li
  15. Manita Bremmers
  16. Walter van der Velden
  17. Harry Dolstra
  18. Leo AB Joosten
  19. Marc E Gomes
  20. Mihai G Netea
  21. Niels Peter Riksen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Radboud University Medical Center, Netherlands
  2. Radboud University, Netherlands
  3. Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Netherlands
  4. University of Bonn, Germany
  5. Hannover Medical School, Germany
  6. Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Netherlands

Abstract

Atherosclerosis is the major cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Monocyte-derived macrophages are the most abundant immune cells in atherosclerotic plaques. In patients with atherosclerotic CVD, leukocytes have a hyperinflammatory phenotype. We hypothesize that immune cell reprogramming in these patients occurs at the level of myeloid progenitors. We included 13 patients with coronary artery disease due to severe atherosclerosis and 13 subjects without atherosclerosis in an exploratory study. Cytokine production capacity after ex vivo stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNCs) and bone marrow MNCs was higher in patients with atherosclerosis. In BM-MNCs this was associated with increased glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation. The BM composition was skewed towards myelopoiesis and transcriptome analysis of HSC/GMP cell populations revealed enrichment of neutrophil- and monocyte-related pathways. These results show that in patients with atherosclerosis, activation of innate immune cells occurs at the level of myeloid progenitors, which adds exciting opportunities for novel treatment strategies.

Data availability

RNA-seq data have been deposited in the ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress)under accession number E-MTAB-9399

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marlies Noz

    Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Siroon Bekkering

    Internal Medicine, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1149-466X
  3. Laszlo Groh

    Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Tim Nielen

    Cardiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7762-5912
  5. Evert Lamfers

    Cardiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5582-3720
  6. Andreas Schlitzer

    University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Saloua El Messaoudi

    Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Niels van Royen

    Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Erik Huys

    Laboratory medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Frank Preijers

    Laboratory medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Esther Smeets

    Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Erik Aarntzen

    Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Bowen Zhang

    Department of Computational Biology for Individualised Infection Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Yang Li

    Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Manita Bremmers

    Haematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Walter van der Velden

    Haematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Harry Dolstra

    Laboratory medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Leo AB Joosten

    Internal Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6166-9830
  19. Marc E Gomes

    Cardiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Mihai G Netea

    Haematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Niels Peter Riksen

    Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    niels.riksen@radboudumc.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9197-8124

Funding

European Unions Horizon 2020 (667837)

  • Leo AB Joosten
  • Mihai G Netea
  • Niels Peter Riksen

Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO SPI 94-212)

  • Mihai G Netea

European Commission (833247)

  • Mihai G Netea

ERA-NET (2018T093)

  • Niels Peter Riksen

Netherlands Organisation for Scientic Research (452173113)

  • Siroon Bekkering

Hartstichting (2018T028)

  • Siroon Bekkering

Hartstichting (CVON2018-27)

  • Leo AB Joosten
  • Mihai G Netea
  • Niels Peter Riksen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent was obtained for all participants.The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board Arnhem/Nijmegen, the Netherlands and registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03172507).

Copyright

© 2020, Noz et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,092
    views
  • 281
    downloads
  • 33
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marlies Noz
  2. Siroon Bekkering
  3. Laszlo Groh
  4. Tim Nielen
  5. Evert Lamfers
  6. Andreas Schlitzer
  7. Saloua El Messaoudi
  8. Niels van Royen
  9. Erik Huys
  10. Frank Preijers
  11. Esther Smeets
  12. Erik Aarntzen
  13. Bowen Zhang
  14. Yang Li
  15. Manita Bremmers
  16. Walter van der Velden
  17. Harry Dolstra
  18. Leo AB Joosten
  19. Marc E Gomes
  20. Mihai G Netea
  21. Niels Peter Riksen
(2020)
Reprogramming of bone marrow myeloid progenitor cells in patients with severe coronary artery disease
eLife 9:e60939.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60939

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60939

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    Yao Li, Hui Xin ... Wei Zhang
    Research Article

    Estrogen significantly impacts women’s health, and postmenopausal hypertension is a common issue characterized by blood pressure fluctuations. Current control strategies for this condition are limited in efficacy, necessitating further research into the underlying mechanisms. Although metabolomics has been applied to study various diseases, its use in understanding postmenopausal hypertension is scarce. Therefore, an ovariectomized rat model was used to simulate postmenopausal conditions. Estrogen levels, blood pressure, and aortic tissue metabolomics were analyzed. Animal models were divided into Sham, OVX, and OVX +E groups. Serum estrogen levels, blood pressure measurements, and aortic tissue metabolomics analyses were performed using radioimmunoassay, UHPLC-Q-TOF, and bioinformatics techniques. Based on the above research content, we successfully established a correlation between low estrogen levels and postmenopausal hypertension in rats. Notable differences in blood pressure parameters and aortic tissue metabolites were observed across the experimental groups. Specifically, metabolites that were differentially expressed, particularly L-alpha-aminobutyric acid (L-AABA), showed potential as a biomarker for postmenopausal hypertension, potentially exerting a protective function through macrophage activation and vascular remodeling. Enrichment analysis revealed alterations in sugar metabolism pathways, such as the Warburg effect and glycolysis, indicating their involvement in postmenopausal hypertension. Overall, this current research provides insights into the metabolic changes associated with postmenopausal hypertension, highlighting the role of L-AABA and sugar metabolism reprogramming in aortic tissue. The findings suggest a potential link between low estrogen levels, macrophage function, and vascular remodeling in the pathogenesis of postmenopausal hypertension. Further investigations are needed to validate these findings and explore their clinical implications for postmenopausal women.

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Gansheng Tan, Anna L Huguenard ... Eric C Leuthardt
    Research Article

    Background:

    Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is characterized by intense central inflammation, leading to substantial post-hemorrhagic complications such as vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia. Given the anti-inflammatory effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) and its ability to promote brain plasticity, taVNS has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for SAH patients. However, the effects of taVNS on cardiovascular dynamics in critically ill patients, like those with SAH, have not yet been investigated. Given the association between cardiac complications and elevated risk of poor clinical outcomes after SAH, it is essential to characterize the cardiovascular effects of taVNS to ensure this approach is safe in this fragile population. Therefore, this study assessed the impact of both acute and repetitive taVNS on cardiovascular function.

    Methods:

    In this randomized clinical trial, 24 SAH patients were assigned to either a taVNS treatment or a sham treatment group. During their stay in the intensive care unit, we monitored patient electrocardiogram readings and vital signs. We compared long-term changes in heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), QT interval, and blood pressure between the two groups. Additionally, we assessed the effects of acute taVNS by comparing cardiovascular metrics before, during, and after the intervention. We also explored acute cardiovascular biomarkers in patients exhibiting clinical improvement.

    Results:

    We found that repetitive taVNS did not significantly alter heart rate, QT interval, blood pressure, or intracranial pressure (ICP). However, repetitive taVNS increased overall HRV and parasympathetic activity compared to the sham treatment. The increase in parasympathetic activity was most pronounced from 2 to 4 days after initial treatment (Cohen’s d = 0.50). Acutely, taVNS increased heart rate, blood pressure, and peripheral perfusion index without affecting the corrected QT interval, ICP, or HRV. The acute post-treatment elevation in heart rate was more pronounced in patients who experienced a decrease of more than one point in their modified Rankin Score at the time of discharge.

    Conclusions:

    Our study found that taVNS treatment did not induce adverse cardiovascular effects, such as bradycardia or QT prolongation, supporting its development as a safe immunomodulatory treatment approach for SAH patients. The observed acute increase in heart rate after taVNS treatment may serve as a biomarker for SAH patients who could derive greater benefit from this treatment.

    Funding:

    The American Association of Neurological Surgeons (ALH), The Aneurysm and AVM Foundation (ALH), The National Institutes of Health R01-EB026439, P41-EB018783, U24-NS109103, R21-NS128307 (ECL, PB), McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience (ECL, PB), and Fondazione Neurone (PB).

    Clinical trial number:

    NCT04557618.