Single caudate neurons encode temporally discounted value for formulating motivation for action

  1. Yukiko Hori
  2. Koki Mimura
  3. Yuji Nagai
  4. Atsushi Fujimoto
  5. Kei Oyama
  6. Erika Kikuchi
  7. Ken-ichi Inoue
  8. Masahiko Takada
  9. Tetsuya Suhara
  10. Barry J Richmond
  11. Takafumi Minamimoto  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Japan
  2. Kyoto University, Japan
  3. NIMH/NIH/DHHS, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA, United States

Abstract

The term ‘temporal discounting’ describes both choice preferences and motivation for delayed rewards. Here we show that neuronal activity in the dorsal part of the primate caudate head (dCDh) signals the temporally discounted value needed to compute the motivation for delayed rewards. Macaque monkeys performed an instrumental task, in which visual cues indicated the forthcoming size and delay duration before reward. Single dCDh neurons represented the temporally discounted value without reflecting changes in the animal’s physiological state. Bilateral pharmacological or chemogenetic inactivation of dCDh markedly distorted the normal task performance based on the integration of reward size and delay, but did not affect the task performance for different reward sizes without delay. These results suggest that dCDh is involved in encoding the integrated multidimensional information critical for motivation.

Data availability

We provide source data to reproduce the main results of the paper presented in Figures 1, 5, 7 and 8.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yukiko Hori

    Department of Functional Brain Imaging, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1023-9587
  2. Koki Mimura

    Department of Functional Brain Imaging, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yuji Nagai

    Department of Functional Brain Imaging, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7005-0749
  4. Atsushi Fujimoto

    Department of Functional Brain Imaging, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1621-2003
  5. Kei Oyama

    Department of Functional Brain Imaging, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Erika Kikuchi

    Department of Functional Brain Imaging, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ken-ichi Inoue

    Systems Neuroscience Section, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Masahiko Takada

    Systems Neuroscience Section, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Tetsuya Suhara

    Department of Functional Brain Imaging, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Barry J Richmond

    Laboratory of Neuropsychology, NIMH/NIH/DHHS, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8234-1540
  11. Takafumi Minamimoto

    Department of Functional Brain Imaging, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
    For correspondence
    minamimoto.takafumi@qst.go.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4305-0174

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP18H04037,JP20H05955)

  • Takafumi Minamimoto

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP20dm0107146)

  • Takafumi Minamimoto

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP20dm0207077)

  • Masahiko Takada

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP20dm0307021)

  • Ken-ichi Inoue

National Institute of Mental Health (Annual Report ZIAMH-2619)

  • Barry J Richmond

Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University (2020-A-6)

  • Takafumi Minamimoto

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All surgical and experimental procedures were approved by the National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (11-1038-11) and by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institute of Mental Health (Annual Report ZIAMH002619), and were in accordance with the Institute of Laboratory Animal Research Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 943
    views
  • 151
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yukiko Hori
  2. Koki Mimura
  3. Yuji Nagai
  4. Atsushi Fujimoto
  5. Kei Oyama
  6. Erika Kikuchi
  7. Ken-ichi Inoue
  8. Masahiko Takada
  9. Tetsuya Suhara
  10. Barry J Richmond
  11. Takafumi Minamimoto
(2021)
Single caudate neurons encode temporally discounted value for formulating motivation for action
eLife 10:e61248.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61248

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61248

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Ilya A Rybak, Natalia A Shevtsova ... Alain Frigon
    Research Advance

    Locomotion is controlled by spinal circuits that interact with supraspinal drives and sensory feedback from the limbs. These sensorimotor interactions are disrupted following spinal cord injury. The thoracic lateral hemisection represents an experimental model of an incomplete spinal cord injury, where connections between the brain and spinal cord are abolished on one side of the cord. To investigate the effects of such an injury on the operation of the spinal locomotor network, we used our computational model of cat locomotion recently published in eLife (Rybak et al., 2024) to investigate and predict changes in cycle and phase durations following a thoracic lateral hemisection during treadmill locomotion in tied-belt (equal left-right speeds) and split-belt (unequal left-right speeds) conditions. In our simulations, the ‘hemisection’ was always applied to the right side. Based on our model, we hypothesized that following hemisection the contralesional (‘intact’, left) side of the spinal network is mostly controlled by supraspinal drives, whereas the ipsilesional (‘hemisected’, right) side is mostly controlled by somatosensory feedback. We then compared the simulated results with those obtained during experiments in adult cats before and after a mid-thoracic lateral hemisection on the right side in the same locomotor conditions. Our experimental results confirmed many effects of hemisection on cat locomotion predicted by our simulations. We show that having the ipsilesional hindlimb step on the slow belt, but not the fast belt, during split-belt locomotion substantially reduces the effects of lateral hemisection. The model provides explanations for changes in temporal characteristics of hindlimb locomotion following hemisection based on altered interactions between spinal circuits, supraspinal drives, and somatosensory feedback.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jill R Turner, Jocelyn Martin
    Insight

    Reversing opioid overdoses in rats using a drug that does not enter the brain prevents the sudden and severe withdrawal symptoms associated with therapeutics that target the central nervous system.