From local resynchronization to global pattern recovery in the zebrafish segmentation clock

  1. Koichiro Uriu  Is a corresponding author
  2. Bo-Kai Liao
  3. Andrew C Oates
  4. Luis G Morelli
  1. Kanazawa University, Japan
  2. National Taiwan Ocean University, Taiwan
  3. École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
  4. Instituto de Investigación en Biomedicina de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Abstract

Integrity of rhythmic spatial gene expression patterns in the vertebrate segmentation clock requires local synchronization between neighboring cells by Delta-Notch signaling and its inhibition causes defective segment boundaries. Whether deformation of the oscillating tissue complements local synchronization during patterning and segment formation is not understood. We combine theory and experiment to investigate this question in the zebrafish segmentation clock. We remove a Notch inhibitor, allowing resynchronization, and analyze embryonic segment recovery. We observe unexpected intermingling of normal and defective segments, and capture this with a new model combining coupled oscillators and tissue mechanics. Intermingled segments are explained in the theory by advection of persistent phase vortices of oscillators. Experimentally observed changes in recovery patterns are predicted in the theory by temporal changes in tissue length and cell advection pattern. Thus, segmental pattern recovery occurs at two length and time scales: rapid local synchronization between neighboring cells, and the slower transport of the resulting patterns across the tissue through morphogenesis.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Koichiro Uriu

    Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
    For correspondence
    uriu@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1802-2470
  2. Bo-Kai Liao

    Department of Aquaculture, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Andrew C Oates

    École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3015-3978
  4. Luis G Morelli

    Cellular Plasticity, Instituto de Investigación en Biomedicina de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5614-073X

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI grant number 17H05762)

  • Koichiro Uriu

ANPCyT (PICT 2013 1301)

  • Luis G Morelli

ANPCyT (PICT 2017 3753)

  • Luis G Morelli

FOCEM-Mercosur (COF 03/11)

  • Luis G Morelli

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Short Term Grant S17064)

  • Koichiro Uriu
  • Luis G Morelli

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI grant number 19H04955)

  • Koichiro Uriu

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI grant number 19H04772)

  • Koichiro Uriu

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 108-2311-B-019-001-MY3)

  • Bo-Kai Liao

SNSF Project funding division III (31003A_176037)

  • Andrew C Oates

Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship in Basic Biomedical Science (WT098025MA)

  • Andrew C Oates

European Research Council Starting Independent Research Grant (ERC-2007-StG: 207634)

  • Bo-Kai Liao
  • Andrew C Oates

Francis Crick Institute

  • Bo-Kai Liao
  • Andrew C Oates

ANPCyT (PICT 2012 1954)

  • Luis G Morelli

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ingmar Riedel-Kruse

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Zebrafish experimentation was carried out in strict accordance with the ethics and regulations of the Saxonian Ministry of the Environment and Agriculture in Germany under licence Az. 74-9165.40-9-2001, and the Home Office in the United Kingdom under project licence PPL No. 70/7675.

Version history

  1. Received: July 23, 2020
  2. Accepted: January 27, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 15, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 22, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Uriu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,403
    views
  • 237
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Koichiro Uriu
  2. Bo-Kai Liao
  3. Andrew C Oates
  4. Luis G Morelli
(2021)
From local resynchronization to global pattern recovery in the zebrafish segmentation clock
eLife 10:e61358.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61358

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61358

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Edgar M Pera, Josefine Nilsson-De Moura ... Ivana Milas
    Research Article

    We previously showed that SerpinE2 and the serine protease HtrA1 modulate fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in germ layer specification and head-to-tail development of Xenopus embryos. Here, we present an extracellular proteolytic mechanism involving this serpin-protease system in the developing neural crest (NC). Knockdown of SerpinE2 by injected antisense morpholino oligonucleotides did not affect the specification of NC progenitors but instead inhibited the migration of NC cells, causing defects in dorsal fin, melanocyte, and craniofacial cartilage formation. Similarly, overexpression of the HtrA1 protease impaired NC cell migration and the formation of NC-derived structures. The phenotype of SerpinE2 knockdown was overcome by concomitant downregulation of HtrA1, indicating that SerpinE2 stimulates NC migration by inhibiting endogenous HtrA1 activity. SerpinE2 binds to HtrA1, and the HtrA1 protease triggers degradation of the cell surface proteoglycan Syndecan-4 (Sdc4). Microinjection of Sdc4 mRNA partially rescued NC migration defects induced by both HtrA1 upregulation and SerpinE2 downregulation. These epistatic experiments suggest a proteolytic pathway by a double inhibition mechanism:

    SerpinE2 ┤HtrA1 protease ┤Syndecan-4 → NC cell migration.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Kristine B Walhovd, Stine K Krogsrud ... Didac Vidal-Pineiro
    Research Article

    Human fetal development has been associated with brain health at later stages. It is unknown whether growth in utero, as indexed by birth weight (BW), relates consistently to lifespan brain characteristics and changes, and to what extent these influences are of a genetic or environmental nature. Here we show remarkably stable and lifelong positive associations between BW and cortical surface area and volume across and within developmental, aging and lifespan longitudinal samples (N = 5794, 4–82 y of age, w/386 monozygotic twins, followed for up to 8.3 y w/12,088 brain MRIs). In contrast, no consistent effect of BW on brain changes was observed. Partly environmental effects were indicated by analysis of twin BW discordance. In conclusion, the influence of prenatal growth on cortical topography is stable and reliable through the lifespan. This early-life factor appears to influence the brain by association of brain reserve, rather than brain maintenance. Thus, fetal influences appear omnipresent in the spacetime of the human brain throughout the human lifespan. Optimizing fetal growth may increase brain reserve for life, also in aging.