Constructing and optimizing 3D atlases from 2D data with application to the developing mouse brain
Abstract
3D imaging data necessitate 3D reference atlases for accurate quantitative interpretation. Existing computational methods to generate 3D atlases from 2D-derived atlases result in extensive artifacts, while manual curation approaches are labor-intensive. We present a computational approach for 3D atlas construction that substantially reduces artifacts by identifying anatomical boundaries in the underlying imaging data and using these to guide 3D transformation. Anatomical boundaries also allow extension of atlases to complete edge regions. Applying these methods to the eight developmental stages in the Allen Developing Mouse Brain Atlas (ADMBA) led to more comprehensive and accurate atlases. We generated imaging data from fifteen whole mouse brains to validate atlas performance and observed qualitative and quantitative improvement (37% greater alignment between atlas and anatomical boundaries). We provide the pipeline as the MagellanMapper software and the eight 3D reconstructed ADMBA atlases. These resources facilitate whole-organ quantitative analysis between samples and across development.
Data availability
The full 3D generated atlases and wild-type brain images are being deposited with the Human Brain Project EBRAINS data platform. All data analyses are included in the manuscript and supporting files.
-
E11.5 3D Edge-Aware Refined Atlas Derived from the Allen Developing Mouse Brain AtlasEBRAINS , 10.25493/H9A3-GFT.
-
E13.5 3D Edge-Aware Refined Atlas Derived from the Allen Developing Mouse Brain AtlasEBRAINS , 10.25493/YP9K-YMW.
-
E15.5 3D Edge-Aware Refined Atlas Derived from the Allen Developing Mouse Brain AtlasEBRAINS , 10.25493/EXET-XND.
-
E18.5 3D Edge-Aware Refined Atlas Derived from the Allen Developing Mouse Brain AtlasEBRAINS , 10.25493/X4ZT-ARE.
-
P4 3D Edge-Aware Refined Atlas Derived from the Allen Developing Mouse Brain AtlasEBRAINS , 10.25493/QYP4-5VQ.
-
P14 3D Edge-Aware Refined Atlas Derived from the Allen Developing Mouse Brain AtlasEBRAINS , 10.25493/QYP4-5VQ.
-
P28 3D Edge-Aware Refined Atlas Derived from the Allen Developing Mouse Brain AtlasEBRAINS , 10.25493/YW1E-6BW.
-
P56 3D Edge-Aware Refined Atlas Derived from the Allen Developing Mouse Brain AtlasEBRAINS , 10.25493/MYPD-QB8.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD Young Investigator Grant)
- Stephan J Sanders
National Institute of Mental Health (U01 MH122681)
- Stephan J Sanders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH109901)
- Stephan J Sanders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS099099)
- John LR Rubenstein
The authors declare that the funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All procedures and animal care were approved and performed in accordance with institutional guidelines from the University of California San Francisco Laboratory Animal Research Center (LARC). All animal handling complied with the approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol (AN180174-02) at the University of California San Francisco.
Reviewing Editor
- Joseph G Gleeson, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, United States
Version history
- Received: July 24, 2020
- Accepted: February 10, 2021
- Accepted Manuscript published: February 11, 2021 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: March 25, 2021 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2021, Young et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,675
- Page views
-
- 279
- Downloads
-
- 10
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: PubMed Central, Crossref, Scopus.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Computational and Systems Biology
- Neuroscience
Previous research has highlighted the role of glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in perceptual, cognitive, and motor tasks. However, the exact involvement of these neurochemical mechanisms in the chain of information processing, and across human development, is unclear. In a cross-sectional longitudinal design, we used a computational approach to dissociate cognitive, decision, and visuomotor processing in 293 individuals spanning early childhood to adulthood. We found that glutamate and GABA within the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) explained unique variance in visuomotor processing, with higher glutamate predicting poorer visuomotor processing in younger participants but better visuomotor processing in mature participants, while GABA showed the opposite pattern. These findings, which were neurochemically, neuroanatomically and functionally specific, were replicated ~21 mo later and were generalized in two further different behavioral tasks. Using resting functional MRI, we revealed that the relationship between IPS neurochemicals and visuomotor processing is mediated by functional connectivity in the visuomotor network. We then extended our findings to high-level cognitive behavior by predicting fluid intelligence performance. We present evidence that fluid intelligence performance is explained by IPS GABA and glutamate and is mediated by visuomotor processing. However, this evidence was obtained using an uncorrected alpha and needs to be replicated in future studies. These results provide an integrative biological and psychological mechanistic explanation that links cognitive processes and neurotransmitters across human development and establishes their potential involvement in intelligent behavior.
-
- Computational and Systems Biology
- Neuroscience
Cerebellar climbing fibers convey diverse signals, but how they are organized in the compartmental structure of the cerebellar cortex during learning remains largely unclear. We analyzed a large amount of coordinate-localized two-photon imaging data from cerebellar Crus II in mice undergoing ‘Go/No-go’ reinforcement learning. Tensor component analysis revealed that a majority of climbing fiber inputs to Purkinje cells were reduced to only four functional components, corresponding to accurate timing control of motor initiation related to a Go cue, cognitive error-based learning, reward processing, and inhibition of erroneous behaviors after a No-go cue. Changes in neural activities during learning of the first two components were correlated with corresponding changes in timing control and error learning across animals, indirectly suggesting causal relationships. Spatial distribution of these components coincided well with boundaries of Aldolase-C/zebrin II expression in Purkinje cells, whereas several components are mixed in single neurons. Synchronization within individual components was bidirectionally regulated according to specific task contexts and learning stages. These findings suggest that, in close collaborations with other brain regions including the inferior olive nucleus, the cerebellum, based on anatomical compartments, reduces dimensions of the learning space by dynamically organizing multiple functional components, a feature that may inspire new-generation AI designs.