Phenotypic plasticity underlies local invasion and distant metastasis in colon cancer

  1. Andrea Sacchetti
  2. Miriam Teeuwssen
  3. Mathijs Verhagen
  4. Rosalie Joosten
  5. Tong Xu
  6. Roberto Stabile
  7. Berdine van der Steen
  8. Martin M Watson
  9. Alem Gusinac
  10. Won Kyu Kim
  11. Inge Ubink
  12. Harmen JG Van de Werken
  13. Arianna Fumagalli
  14. Madelon Paauwe
  15. Jacco Van Rheenen
  16. Owen J Sansom
  17. Onno Kranenburg
  18. Riccardo Fodde  Is a corresponding author
  1. Erasmus MC, Netherlands
  2. Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea
  3. University Medical Centre Utrecht, Netherlands
  4. Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Netherlands
  5. Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, United Kingdom
  6. Netherlands Cancer Institute, Netherlands
  7. CRUK Beatson Institute, United Kingdom

Abstract

Phenotypic plasticity represents the most relevant hallmark of the carcinoma cell as it bestows it with the capacity of transiently altering its morphologic and functional features while en route to the metastatic site. However, the study of phenotypic plasticity is hindered by the rarity of these events within primary lesions and by the lack of experimental models. Here, we identified a subpopulation of phenotypic plastic colon cancer cells: EpCAMlo cells are motile, invasive, chemo-resistant, and highly metastatic. EpCAMlo bulk and single-cell RNAseq analysis indicated 1. enhanced Wnt/b-catenin signaling, 2. a broad spectrum of degrees of EMT activation including hybrid E/M states (partial EMT) with highly plastic features, and 3. high correlation with the CMS4 subtype, accounting for colon cancer cases with poor prognosis and a pronounced stromal component. Of note, a signature of genes specifically expressed in EpCAMlo cancer cells is highly predictive of overall survival in tumors other than CMS4, thus highlighting the relevance of quasi-mesenchymal tumor cells across the spectrum of colon cancers. Enhanced Wnt and the downstream EMT activation represent key events in eliciting phenotypic plasticity along the invasive front of primary colon carcinomas. Distinct sets of epithelial and mesenchymal genes define transcriptional trajectories through which state transitions arise. pEMT cells, often earmarked by the extracellular matrix glycoprotein SPARC together with nuclear ZEB1 and b-catenin along the invasive front of primary colon carcinomas, are predicted to represent the origin of these (de)differentiation routes through biologically-distinct cellular states, and to underlie the phenotypic plasticity of colon cancer cells.

Data availability

The RNA-sequencing data from this study have been submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under the accession number GSE154927 and GSE154930 for the bulk and single-cell RNAseq data, respectively.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andrea Sacchetti

    Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Miriam Teeuwssen

    Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mathijs Verhagen

    Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3126-8379
  4. Rosalie Joosten

    Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tong Xu

    Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Roberto Stabile

    Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Berdine van der Steen

    Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Martin M Watson

    Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Alem Gusinac

    Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Won Kyu Kim

    Natural Product Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Gangneung, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Inge Ubink

    Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Harmen JG Van de Werken

    Department of Cell Biology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9794-1477
  13. Arianna Fumagalli

    n/a, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Madelon Paauwe

    n/a, Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Jacco Van Rheenen

    Van Rheenen group, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Owen J Sansom

    Institute of Cancer Sciences, CRUK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9540-3010
  17. Onno Kranenburg

    Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Riccardo Fodde

    Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    r.fodde@erasmusmc.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9839-4324

Funding

Maag Lever Darm Stichting (FP 15-09)

  • Riccardo Fodde

KWF Kankerbestrijding (EMCR 2015-8090)

  • Riccardo Fodde

Cancer Research UK (A17196/A21139)

  • Owen J Sansom

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All protocols involving animals were approved by the Dutch Animal Experimental Committee and were conformed to the Code of Practice for Animal Experiments in Cancer Research established by the Netherlands Inspectorate for Health Protections, Commodities and Veterinary Public health (The Hague, the Netherlands, 1999).

Copyright

© 2021, Sacchetti et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,181
    views
  • 606
    downloads
  • 49
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andrea Sacchetti
  2. Miriam Teeuwssen
  3. Mathijs Verhagen
  4. Rosalie Joosten
  5. Tong Xu
  6. Roberto Stabile
  7. Berdine van der Steen
  8. Martin M Watson
  9. Alem Gusinac
  10. Won Kyu Kim
  11. Inge Ubink
  12. Harmen JG Van de Werken
  13. Arianna Fumagalli
  14. Madelon Paauwe
  15. Jacco Van Rheenen
  16. Owen J Sansom
  17. Onno Kranenburg
  18. Riccardo Fodde
(2021)
Phenotypic plasticity underlies local invasion and distant metastasis in colon cancer
eLife 10:e61461.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61461

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61461

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Zijing Wang, Bihan Xia ... Jilin Yang
    Research Article

    Bestrophin isoform 4 (BEST4) is a newly identified subtype of the calcium-activated chloride channel family. Analysis of colonic epithelial cell diversity by single-cell RNA-sequencing has revealed the existence of a cluster of BEST4+ mature colonocytes in humans. However, if the role of BEST4 is involved in regulating tumour progression remains largely unknown. In this study, we demonstrate that BEST4 overexpression attenuates cell proliferation, colony formation, and mobility in colorectal cancer (CRC) in vitro, and impedes the tumour growth and the liver metastasis in vivo. BEST4 is co-expressed with hairy/enhancer of split 4 (HES4) in the nucleus of cells, and HES4 signals BEST4 by interacting with the upstream region of the BEST4 promoter. BEST4 is epistatic to HES4 and downregulates TWIST1, thereby inhibiting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in CRC. Conversely, knockout of BEST4 using CRISPR/Cas9 in CRC cells revitalises tumour growth and induces EMT. Furthermore, the low level of the BEST4 mRNA is correlated with advanced and the worse prognosis, suggesting its potential role involving CRC progression.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Bruno Bockorny, Lakshmi Muthuswamy ... Senthil K Muthuswamy
    Tools and Resources

    Pancreatic cancer has the worst prognosis of all common tumors. Earlier cancer diagnosis could increase survival rates and better assessment of metastatic disease could improve patient care. As such, there is an urgent need to develop biomarkers to diagnose this deadly malignancy. Analyzing circulating extracellular vesicles (cEVs) using ‘liquid biopsies’ offers an attractive approach to diagnose and monitor disease status. However, it is important to differentiate EV-associated proteins enriched in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from those with benign pancreatic diseases such as chronic pancreatitis and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). To meet this need, we combined the novel EVtrap method for highly efficient isolation of EVs from plasma and conducted proteomics analysis of samples from 124 individuals, including patients with PDAC, benign pancreatic diseases and controls. On average, 912 EV proteins were identified per 100 µL of plasma. EVs containing high levels of PDCD6IP, SERPINA12, and RUVBL2 were associated with PDAC compared to the benign diseases in both discovery and validation cohorts. EVs with PSMB4, RUVBL2, and ANKAR were associated with metastasis, and those with CRP, RALB, and CD55 correlated with poor clinical prognosis. Finally, we validated a seven EV protein PDAC signature against a background of benign pancreatic diseases that yielded an 89% prediction accuracy for the diagnosis of PDAC. To our knowledge, our study represents the largest proteomics profiling of circulating EVs ever conducted in pancreatic cancer and provides a valuable open-source atlas to the scientific community with a comprehensive catalogue of novel cEVs that may assist in the development of biomarkers and improve the outcomes of patients with PDAC.