Zinc shapes the folding landscape of p53 and establishes a pathway for reactivating structurally diverse cancer mutants

  1. Adam R Blanden
  2. Xin Yu
  3. Alan J Blayney
  4. Christopher Demas
  5. Jeung-Hoi Ha
  6. Yue Liu
  7. Tracy Withers
  8. Darren R Carpizo  Is a corresponding author
  9. Stewart N Loh  Is a corresponding author
  1. SUNY Upstate Medical University, United States
  2. Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, United States
  3. University of Rochester Medical Center, United States

Abstract

Missense mutations in the p53 DNA binding domain (DBD) contribute to half of new cancer cases annually. Here we present a thermodynamic model that quantifies and links the major pathways by which mutations inactivate p53. We find that DBD possesses two unusual properties-one of the highest zinc affinities of any eukaryotic protein and extreme instability in the absence of zinc-which are predicted to poise p53 on the cusp of folding/unfolding in the cell, with a major determinant being available zinc concentration. We analyze the 20 most common tumorigenic p53 mutations and find that 80% impair zinc affinity, thermodynamic stability, or both. Biophysical, cell-based, and murine xenograft experiments demonstrate that a synthetic zinc metallochaperone rescues not only mutations that decrease zinc affinity, but also mutations that destabilize DBD without impairing zinc binding. The results suggest that zinc metallochaperones have the capability to treat 120,500 patients annually in the U.S.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Adam R Blanden

    Neurology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Xin Yu

    Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alan J Blayney

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0741-1550
  4. Christopher Demas

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jeung-Hoi Ha

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yue Liu

    Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tracy Withers

    Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Darren R Carpizo

    Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States
    For correspondence
    darren_carpizo@urmc.rochester.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Stewart N Loh

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, United States
    For correspondence
    lohs@upstate.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4387-9644

Funding

National Institutes of Health (F30 GM113299)

  • Adam R Blanden
  • Stewart N Loh

National Institutes of Health (R01 CA200800)

  • Darren R Carpizo

National Institutes of Health (K08 CA172676)

  • Darren R Carpizo

Breast Cancer Research Foundation

  • Darren R Carpizo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mice were housed and treated according to guidelines established by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Rutgers University, who also approved all mouse experiments. (animal protocol PROTO99900044, approval date 10/16/2019 - 10/15/2022).

Copyright

© 2020, Blanden et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,171
    views
  • 653
    downloads
  • 51
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Adam R Blanden
  2. Xin Yu
  3. Alan J Blayney
  4. Christopher Demas
  5. Jeung-Hoi Ha
  6. Yue Liu
  7. Tracy Withers
  8. Darren R Carpizo
  9. Stewart N Loh
(2020)
Zinc shapes the folding landscape of p53 and establishes a pathway for reactivating structurally diverse cancer mutants
eLife 9:e61487.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61487

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61487

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Zijing Wang, Bihan Xia ... Jilin Yang
    Research Article

    Bestrophin isoform 4 (BEST4) is a newly identified subtype of the calcium-activated chloride channel family. Analysis of colonic epithelial cell diversity by single-cell RNA-sequencing has revealed the existence of a cluster of BEST4+ mature colonocytes in humans. However, if the role of BEST4 is involved in regulating tumour progression remains largely unknown. In this study, we demonstrate that BEST4 overexpression attenuates cell proliferation, colony formation, and mobility in colorectal cancer (CRC) in vitro, and impedes the tumour growth and the liver metastasis in vivo. BEST4 is co-expressed with hairy/enhancer of split 4 (HES4) in the nucleus of cells, and HES4 signals BEST4 by interacting with the upstream region of the BEST4 promoter. BEST4 is epistatic to HES4 and downregulates TWIST1, thereby inhibiting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in CRC. Conversely, knockout of BEST4 using CRISPR/Cas9 in CRC cells revitalises tumour growth and induces EMT. Furthermore, the low level of the BEST4 mRNA is correlated with advanced and the worse prognosis, suggesting its potential role involving CRC progression.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Bruno Bockorny, Lakshmi Muthuswamy ... Senthil K Muthuswamy
    Tools and Resources

    Pancreatic cancer has the worst prognosis of all common tumors. Earlier cancer diagnosis could increase survival rates and better assessment of metastatic disease could improve patient care. As such, there is an urgent need to develop biomarkers to diagnose this deadly malignancy. Analyzing circulating extracellular vesicles (cEVs) using ‘liquid biopsies’ offers an attractive approach to diagnose and monitor disease status. However, it is important to differentiate EV-associated proteins enriched in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from those with benign pancreatic diseases such as chronic pancreatitis and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). To meet this need, we combined the novel EVtrap method for highly efficient isolation of EVs from plasma and conducted proteomics analysis of samples from 124 individuals, including patients with PDAC, benign pancreatic diseases and controls. On average, 912 EV proteins were identified per 100 µL of plasma. EVs containing high levels of PDCD6IP, SERPINA12, and RUVBL2 were associated with PDAC compared to the benign diseases in both discovery and validation cohorts. EVs with PSMB4, RUVBL2, and ANKAR were associated with metastasis, and those with CRP, RALB, and CD55 correlated with poor clinical prognosis. Finally, we validated a seven EV protein PDAC signature against a background of benign pancreatic diseases that yielded an 89% prediction accuracy for the diagnosis of PDAC. To our knowledge, our study represents the largest proteomics profiling of circulating EVs ever conducted in pancreatic cancer and provides a valuable open-source atlas to the scientific community with a comprehensive catalogue of novel cEVs that may assist in the development of biomarkers and improve the outcomes of patients with PDAC.