Increased influence of prior choices on perceptual decisions in autism

  1. Helen Feigin
  2. Shir Shalom-Sperber
  3. Ditza A Zachor
  4. Adam Zaidel  Is a corresponding author
  1. Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar Ilan University, Israel
  2. The Autism Center/ALUT, Shamir Medical Center, Israel
  3. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
7 figures, 2 tables and 1 additional file

Figures

Location discrimination – event sequence within and across trials.

All stimuli (filled circles) were discriminated according to location, that is, whether the circle lay to the left or to the right of the screen center (2AFC). Each trial comprised a series of …

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Location discrimination – psychometric function shifts.

(A) Psychometric curves for an example participant with ASD (left plot) and an example control participant (right plot) performing location discrimination. The psychometric curves represent the …

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Test stimulus convergence for the location discrimination experiment, primary condition.

Magnitude (absolute value) of the ‘test’ circle location as a function of trial number. Red and blue lines (bands) represent mean stimulus location (± SEM) for the ASD and control participants, …

Perceptual decision model schematic.

Perceptual choices were modeled using a logistic regression with four factors (providing their respective fitted beta coefficients): (i) the current stimulus (βcurr_stimulus), (ii) previous stimuli …

Figure 4 with 2 supplements
Location discrimination (primary condition) – model parameters.

Beta coefficients for model parameters: current stimulus, previous choices and previous stimuli (left, center, and right plots, respectively). Red and blue bars represent the values (mean ± SEM) for …

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Location discrimination (primary condition) – five choices back model parameters.

Current stimulus (A) and previous choices (B) beta coefficients (mean ± SEM) for the ASD (red) and control (blue) participants. The prior choice at t-1 immediately precedes the current choice (at t).…

Figure 4—figure supplement 2
Scatter of βprev_choices coefficients (primary condition) vs. ADOS scores.

Each data point represents one ASD participant.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement
Heading discrimination – psychometric function shifts.

(A) Psychometric curves for an example participant with ASD (left plot) and an example control participant (right plot) performing heading discrimination (visual condition, with 50% coherence). The …

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Stimulus convergence for the heading discrimination experiment.

Stimulus heading direction (absolute value) as a function of trial number for (A) vestibular and (B) visual trials (with different coherence levels). Red and blue lines (bands) represent the mean (± …

Heading discrimination – model parameters.

Beta coefficients for three model parameters: current stimulus, previous choice and previous stimulus (left, center, and right plots, respectively). These were averaged over three stimulus …

Figure 7 with 2 supplements
Results for the Response Invariant location discrimination condition.

(A) PSE shifts (ΔPSE = PSE for left biased priors minus PSE for right biased prior). Red and blue bars represent ΔPSEs (mean ± SEM) for participants with ASD and controls, respectively. (B) Beta …

Figure 7—figure supplement 1
Test stimulus convergence for the location discrimination experiment, Response Invariant condition.

Magnitude (absolute value) of the ‘test’ circle location as a function of trial number. Red and blue lines (bands) represent mean stimulus location (± SEM) for the ASD and control participants, …

Figure 7—figure supplement 2
Scatter of βprev_choices coefficients (Response Invariant condition) vs. ADOS scores.

Each data point represents one ASD participant. The dashed line marks y = 0.

Tables

Table 1
ASD participant details.
ASD participant numberAgeSCQIQ – WISC IVADOSADI-R
Block-DesignMatrix-ReasoningVocabularySimilaritiesCalibrated Severity ScoreSocial AffectRRBReciprocal Social InteractionCommunicationRRB
18177910997713115
2917119989101027146
310211316131388810131
41014121310169991185
51011977799912122
611211110710877131510
711157118788811115
811191213101677717135
9112212911107101023197
101213151312109881183
11122910127877720194
121322871181010101499
131312710810109923114
1414191591517109920148
15141414912157551175
16151879109666845
171630139111286613138
1817229118101010101156
Mean ± SD12.1 ± 2.418.7 ± 5.310.7 ± 2.810.3 ± 2.39.9 ± 2.210.8 ± 3.28.4 ± 1.28.1 ± 1.68.1 ± 1.614.9 ± 5.411.4 ± 4.25.4 ± 2.3
  1. SCQ scores are current from the time of the study. Other scores are from within 0–5 years of the study. RRB - Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors.

Table 2
Control participant details.
Control participant numberAgeSCQIQ – WISC IV
Block-DesignMatrix-ReasoningVocabularySimilarities
18514101812
29114101510
39113131714
49113141415
510111101012
6111915158
7113108910
81210611109
912112789
1012198119
1113314121318
121305889
1313814171116
141431015813
1515010141213
16155121697
1715713161215
181621414811
191638899
201621110511
Mean ± SD12.5 ± 2.62.9 ± 2.811.1 ± 2.711.8 ± 3.211.1 ± 3.411.5 ± 3.0
  1. IQ and SCQ scores are current from the time of the study.

Additional files

Download links