Increased influence of prior choices on perceptual decisions in autism

  1. Helen Feigin
  2. Shir Shalom-Sperber
  3. Ditza A Zachor
  4. Adam Zaidel  Is a corresponding author
  1. Bar Ilan University, Israel
  2. Shamir Medical Center, Israel

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) manifests sensory and perceptual atypicalities. Recent theories suggest that these may reflect a reduced influence of prior information in ASD. Some studies have found reduced adaptation to recent sensory stimuli in ASD. However, the effects of prior stimuli and prior perceptual choices can counteract one-another. Here, we investigated this using two different tasks (in two different cohorts): (i) visual location discrimination, and (ii) multisensory (visual-vestibular) heading discrimination. We fit the data using a logistic regression model to dissociate the specific effects of prior stimuli and prior choices. In both tasks perceptual decisions were biased toward recent choices. Notably, the 'attractive' effect of prior choices was significantly larger in ASD (in both tasks and cohorts), while there was no difference in the influence of prior stimuli. These results challenge theories of reduced priors in ASD, and rather suggest an increased consistency bias for perceptual decisions in ASD.

Data availability

The data and analysis code for the location discrimination experiments (i.e., the new data from this study) have been uploaded to github and can be found at https://github.com/HF-GH/ASD.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Helen Feigin

    Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Shir Shalom-Sperber

    Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ditza A Zachor

    The Autism Center/ALUT, Shamir Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Adam Zaidel

    Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
    For correspondence
    adam.zaidel@biu.ac.il
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4405-8717

Funding

The Israeli Centers of Research Excellence (Center No. 51/11)

  • Adam Zaidel

Israel Science Foundation (Grant no. 1291/20)

  • Adam Zaidel

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Marisa Carrasco, New York University, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: This study was approved by the institutional Helsinki committee at The Shamir Medical Center (0214-15-ASF) and the internal review board at Bar-Ilan University. All participants (and one of their caregivers) signed informed consent.

Version history

  1. Received: July 30, 2020
  2. Accepted: July 1, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 7, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: July 8, 2021 (version 2)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: July 9, 2021 (version 3)
  6. Version of Record published: July 19, 2021 (version 4)
  7. Version of Record updated: July 23, 2021 (version 5)

Copyright

© 2021, Feigin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,847
    views
  • 269
    downloads
  • 12
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Helen Feigin
  2. Shir Shalom-Sperber
  3. Ditza A Zachor
  4. Adam Zaidel
(2021)
Increased influence of prior choices on perceptual decisions in autism
eLife 10:e61595.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61595

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61595

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Ivan Tomić, Paul M Bays
    Research Article

    Probing memory of a complex visual image within a few hundred milliseconds after its disappearance reveals significantly greater fidelity of recall than if the probe is delayed by as little as a second. Classically interpreted, the former taps into a detailed but rapidly decaying visual sensory or ‘iconic’ memory (IM), while the latter relies on capacity-limited but comparatively stable visual working memory (VWM). While iconic decay and VWM capacity have been extensively studied independently, currently no single framework quantitatively accounts for the dynamics of memory fidelity over these time scales. Here, we extend a stationary neural population model of VWM with a temporal dimension, incorporating rapid sensory-driven accumulation of activity encoding each visual feature in memory, and a slower accumulation of internal error that causes memorized features to randomly drift over time. Instead of facilitating read-out from an independent sensory store, an early cue benefits recall by lifting the effective limit on VWM signal strength imposed when multiple items compete for representation, allowing memory for the cued item to be supplemented with information from the decaying sensory trace. Empirical measurements of human recall dynamics validate these predictions while excluding alternative model architectures. A key conclusion is that differences in capacity classically thought to distinguish IM and VWM are in fact contingent upon a single resource-limited WM store.

    1. Neuroscience
    Emilio Salinas, Bashirul I Sheikh
    Insight

    Our ability to recall details from a remembered image depends on a single mechanism that is engaged from the very moment the image disappears from view.