Abstract

Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is the predominant pathway that repairs DNA double strand breaks in vertebrates. During NHEJ DNA ends are held together by a multi-protein synaptic complex until they are ligated. Here we use Xenopus laevis egg extract to investigate the role of the intrinsically disordered C-terminal tail of XLF, a critical factor in end synapsis. We demonstrate that the XLF tail along with the Ku binding motif (KBM) at the extreme C-terminus are required for end joining. While the underlying sequence of the tail can be varied, a minimal tail length is required for NHEJ. Single-molecule FRET experiments that observe end synapsis in real-time show that this defect is due to a failure to closely align DNA ends. Our data supports a model in which a single C-terminal tail tethers XLF to Ku while allowing XLF to form interactions with XRCC4 that enable synaptic complex formation.

Data availability

Source data files for all summary graphs have been provided. The MATLAB scripts used to analyze and generate the results shown in Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure 5 are also included.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sean M Carney

    Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2674-1064
  2. Andrew T Moreno

    Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sadie C Piatt

    Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Metztli Cisneros-Aguirre

    Department of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Felicia Wednesday Lopezcolorado

    Department of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2916-6042
  6. Jeremy M Stark

    Department of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Joseph J Loparo

    Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    joseph_loparo@hms.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4941-4696

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01GM115487)

  • Joseph J Loparo

National Institutes of Health (R01CA197506)

  • Jeremy M Stark

National Institutes of Health (R01CA240392)

  • Jeremy M Stark

National Institutes of Health (F32GM129913)

  • Sean M Carney

National Institutes of Health (T32 GM008313)

  • Sadie C Piatt

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Harvard Medical School approved of all work performed in this study (Protocol# IS00000051-6), which was done in accordance with AAALAC rules and regulations.

Copyright

© 2020, Carney et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,537
    views
  • 219
    downloads
  • 24
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sean M Carney
  2. Andrew T Moreno
  3. Sadie C Piatt
  4. Metztli Cisneros-Aguirre
  5. Felicia Wednesday Lopezcolorado
  6. Jeremy M Stark
  7. Joseph J Loparo
(2020)
XLF acts as a flexible connector during non-homologous end joining
eLife 9:e61920.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61920

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61920

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Daphne R Knudsen-Palmer, Pravrutha Raman ... Antony M Jose
    Research Article

    Since double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is effective for silencing a wide variety of genes, all genes are typically considered equivalent targets for such RNA interference (RNAi). Yet, loss of some regulators of RNAi in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans can selectively impair the silencing of some genes. Here, we show that such selective requirements can be explained by an intersecting network of regulators acting on genes with differences in their RNA metabolism. In this network, the Maelstrom domain-containing protein RDE-10, the intrinsically disordered protein MUT-16, and the Argonaute protein NRDE-3 work together so that any two are required for silencing one somatic gene, but each is singly required for silencing another somatic gene, where only the requirement for NRDE-3 can be overcome by enhanced dsRNA processing. Quantitative models and their exploratory simulations led us to find that (1) changing cis-regulatory elements of the target gene can reduce the dependence on NRDE-3, (2) animals can recover from silencing in non-dividing cells, and (3) cleavage and tailing of mRNAs with UG dinucleotides, which makes them templates for amplifying small RNAs, are enriched within ‘pUG zones’ matching the dsRNA. Similar crosstalk between pathways and restricted amplification could result in apparently selective silencing by endogenous RNAs.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Shuvra Shekhar Roy, Sulochana Bagri ... Shantanu Chowdhury
    Research Article

    Although the role of G-quadruplex (G4) DNA structures has been suggested in chromosomal looping this was not tested directly. Here, to test causal function, an array of G4s, or control sequence that does not form G4s, were inserted within chromatin in cells. In vivo G4 formation of the inserted G4 sequence array, and not the control sequence, was confirmed using G4-selective antibody. Compared to the control insert, we observed a remarkable increase in the number of 3D chromatin looping interactions from the inserted G4 array. This was evident within the immediate topologically associated domain (TAD) and throughout the genome. Locally, recruitment of enhancer histone marks and the transcriptional coactivator p300/Acetylated-p300 increased in the G4-array, but not in the control insertion. Resulting promoter-enhancer interactions and gene activation were clear up to 5 Mb away from the insertion site. Together, these show the causal role of G4s in enhancer function and long-range chromatin interactions. Mechanisms of 3D topology are primarily based on DNA-bound architectural proteins that induce/stabilize long-range interactions. Involvement of the underlying intrinsic DNA sequence/structure in 3D looping shown here therefore throws new light on how long-range chromosomal interactions might be induced or maintained.