Phylogenomics of white-eyes, a 'great speciator', reveals Indonesian archipelago as the center of lineage diversity

  1. Chyi Yin Gwee
  2. Kritika M Garg
  3. Balaji Chattopadhyay
  4. Keren R Sadanandan
  5. Dewi M Prawiradilaga
  6. Martin Irestedt
  7. Fumin Lei
  8. Luke M Bloch
  9. Jessica GH Lee
  10. Mohammad Irham
  11. Tri Haryoko
  12. Malcolm CK Soh
  13. Kelvin S-H Peh
  14. Karen MC Rowe
  15. Teuku Reza Ferasyi
  16. Shaoyuan Wu
  17. Guinevere OU Wogan
  18. Rauri CK Bowie
  19. Frank E Rheindt  Is a corresponding author
  1. National University of Singapore, Singapore
  2. Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Indonesia
  3. Swedish Museum of Natural History, Sweden
  4. Institute of Zoology (CAS), China
  5. University of California, Berkeley, United States
  6. Wildlife Reserves Singapore, Singapore
  7. University of Western Australia, Australia
  8. University of Southampton, United Kingdom
  9. Museums Victoria, Australia
  10. Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
  11. Jiangsu Normal University, China

Abstract

Archipelagoes serve as important 'natural laboratories' which facilitate the study of island radiations and contribute to the understanding of evolutionary processes. The white-eye genus Zosterops is a classical example of a 'great speciator', comprising c. 100 species from across the Old World, most of them insular. We achieved an extensive geographic DNA sampling of Zosterops by using historical specimens and recently collected samples. Using over 700 genome-wide loci in conjunction with coalescent species tree methods and gene flow detection approaches, we untangled the reticulated evolutionary history of Zosterops, which comprises three main clades centered in Indo-Africa, Asia, and Australasia, respectively. Genetic introgression between species permeates the Zosterops phylogeny, regardless of how distantly related species are. Crucially, we identified the Indonesian archipelago, and specifically Borneo, as the major centre of diversity and the only area where all three main clades overlap, attesting to the evolutionary importance of this region.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in Dryad database: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8931zcrmt. Raw FASTQ files of target enriched samples are available on NCBI under BioProject no. PRJNA682287.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Chyi Yin Gwee

    Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Kritika M Garg

    Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Balaji Chattopadhyay

    Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Keren R Sadanandan

    Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Dewi M Prawiradilaga

    Division of Zoology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Jakarta, Indonesia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Martin Irestedt

    Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Fumin Lei

    Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology (CAS), Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Luke M Bloch

    Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jessica GH Lee

    Conservation, Wildlife Reserves Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Mohammad Irham

    Division of Zoology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Jakarta, Indonesia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Tri Haryoko

    Division of Zoology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Jakarta, Indonesia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Malcolm CK Soh

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Kelvin S-H Peh

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2921-1341
  14. Karen MC Rowe

    Sciences Department, Museums Victoria, Victoria, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6131-6418
  15. Teuku Reza Ferasyi

    Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Shaoyuan Wu

    School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Jiangsu, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Guinevere OU Wogan

    Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Rauri CK Bowie

    Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8328-6021
  19. Frank E Rheindt

    Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    For correspondence
    dbsrfe@nus.edu.sg
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8946-7085

Funding

Singapore Ministry of Education (R-154-000-A59-112)

  • Frank E Rheindt

Wildlife Reserved Singapore Conservation Fund (R-154-000-A99-592)

  • Frank E Rheindt

Croeni Foundation (R-154-000-A05-592)

  • Frank E Rheindt

SEABIG (R-154-000-648-646)

  • Balaji Chattopadhyay

SEABIG (R-154-000-648-733)

  • Balaji Chattopadhyay

University of Southampton research grant (511206105)

  • Kelvin S-H Peh

US National Science Foundation grant (DEB-1441652)

  • Rauri CK Bowie

US National Science Foundation grant (DEB-1457845)

  • Rauri CK Bowie

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Gwee et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,159
    views
  • 311
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Chyi Yin Gwee
  2. Kritika M Garg
  3. Balaji Chattopadhyay
  4. Keren R Sadanandan
  5. Dewi M Prawiradilaga
  6. Martin Irestedt
  7. Fumin Lei
  8. Luke M Bloch
  9. Jessica GH Lee
  10. Mohammad Irham
  11. Tri Haryoko
  12. Malcolm CK Soh
  13. Kelvin S-H Peh
  14. Karen MC Rowe
  15. Teuku Reza Ferasyi
  16. Shaoyuan Wu
  17. Guinevere OU Wogan
  18. Rauri CK Bowie
  19. Frank E Rheindt
(2020)
Phylogenomics of white-eyes, a 'great speciator', reveals Indonesian archipelago as the center of lineage diversity
eLife 9:e62765.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62765

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62765

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Anastasia A Makarova, Nicholas J Chua ... Alexey A Polilov
    Research Article

    The structure of compound eyes in arthropods has been the subject of many studies, revealing important biological principles. Until recently, these studies were constrained by the two-dimensional nature of available ultrastructural data. By taking advantage of the novel three-dimensional ultrastructural dataset obtained using volume electron microscopy, we present the first cellular-level reconstruction of the whole compound eye of an insect, the miniaturized parasitoid wasp Megaphragma viggianii. The compound eye of the female M. viggianii consists of 29 ommatidia and contains 478 cells. Despite the almost anucleate brain, all cells of the compound eye contain nuclei. As in larger insects, the dorsal rim area of the eye in M. viggianii contains ommatidia that are believed to be specialized in polarized light detection as reflected in their corneal and retinal morphology. We report the presence of three ‘ectopic’ photoreceptors. Our results offer new insights into the miniaturization of compound eyes and scaling of sensory organs in general.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Nagatoshi Machii, Ryo Hatashima ... Masato Nikaido
    Research Article

    Cichlid fishes inhabiting the East African Great Lakes, Victoria, Malawi, and Tanganyika, are textbook examples of parallel evolution, as they have acquired similar traits independently in each of the three lakes during the process of adaptive radiation. In particular, ‘hypertrophied lip’ has been highlighted as a prominent example of parallel evolution. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this study, we conducted an integrated comparative analysis between the hypertrophied and normal lips of cichlids across three lakes based on histology, proteomics, and transcriptomics. Histological and proteomic analyses revealed that the hypertrophied lips were characterized by enlargement of the proteoglycan-rich layer, in which versican and periostin proteins were abundant. Transcriptome analysis revealed that the expression of extracellular matrix-related genes, including collagens, glycoproteins, and proteoglycans, was higher in hypertrophied lips, regardless of their phylogenetic relationships. In addition, the genes in Wnt signaling pathway, which is involved in promoting proteoglycan expression, was highly expressed in both the juvenile and adult stages of hypertrophied lips. Our comprehensive analyses showed that hypertrophied lips of the three different phylogenetic origins can be explained by similar proteomic and transcriptomic profiles, which may provide important clues into the molecular mechanisms underlying phenotypic parallelisms in East African cichlids.