Antagonism between killer yeast strains as an experimental model for biological nucleation dynamics

  1. Andrea Giometto  Is a corresponding author
  2. David R Nelson
  3. Andrew W Murray
  1. Cornell University, United States
  2. Harvard University, United States

Abstract

Antagonistic interactions are widespread in the microbial world and affect microbial evolutionary dynamics. Natural microbial communities often display spatial structure, which affects biological interactions, but much of what we know about microbial warfare comes from laboratory studies of well-mixed communities. To overcome this limitation, we manipulated two killer strains of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, expressing different toxins, to independently control the rate at which they released their toxins. We developed mathematical models that predict the experimental dynamics of competition between toxin-producing strains in both well-mixed and spatially structured populations. In both situations, we experimentally verified theory's prediction that a stronger antagonist can invade a weaker one only if the initial invading population exceeds a critical frequency or size. Finally, we found that toxin-resistant cells and weaker killers arose in spatially structured competitions between toxin-producing strains, suggesting that adaptive evolution can affect the outcome of microbial antagonism in spatial settings.

Data availability

All data are included in the manuscript and supporting files. All source code that generated figures and numerical results has been uploaded on GitHub at the URL: https://github.com/andreagiometto/Giometto_Nelson_Murray_2020. Source data files have been provided for all Figures displaying data.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andrea Giometto

    School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    For correspondence
    giometto@cornell.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0544-6023
  2. David R Nelson

    Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Andrew W Murray

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0868-6604

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation (P2ELP2_168498)

  • Andrea Giometto

Swiss National Science Foundation (P400PB_180823)

  • Andrea Giometto

Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0041/2014)

  • David R Nelson
  • Andrew W Murray

National Science Foundation (1764269)

  • Andrew W Murray

Simons Foundation (594596)

  • Andrew W Murray

National Science Foundation (DMR1608501)

  • David R Nelson

Harvard Materials Science Research and Engineering Center (DMR-2011754)

  • David R Nelson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Giometto et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,533
    views
  • 229
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andrea Giometto
  2. David R Nelson
  3. Andrew W Murray
(2021)
Antagonism between killer yeast strains as an experimental model for biological nucleation dynamics
eLife 10:e62932.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62932

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62932

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Marta Urbanska, Yan Ge ... Jochen Guck
    Research Article

    Cell mechanical properties determine many physiological functions, such as cell fate specification, migration, or circulation through vasculature. Identifying factors that govern the mechanical properties is therefore a subject of great interest. Here, we present a mechanomics approach for establishing links between single-cell mechanical phenotype changes and the genes involved in driving them. We combine mechanical characterization of cells across a variety of mouse and human systems with machine learning-based discriminative network analysis of associated transcriptomic profiles to infer a conserved network module of five genes with putative roles in cell mechanics regulation. We validate in silico that the identified gene markers are universal, trustworthy, and specific to the mechanical phenotype across the studied mouse and human systems, and demonstrate experimentally that a selected target, CAV1, changes the mechanical phenotype of cells accordingly when silenced or overexpressed. Our data-driven approach paves the way toward engineering cell mechanical properties on demand to explore their impact on physiological and pathological cell functions.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    M Julia Maristany, Anne Aguirre Gonzalez ... Jerelle A Joseph
    Research Article

    Proteins containing prion-like low complexity domains (PLDs) are common drivers of the formation of biomolecular condensates and are prone to misregulation due to amino acid mutations. Here, we exploit the accuracy of our residue-resolution coarse-grained model, Mpipi, to quantify the impact of amino acid mutations on the stability of 140 PLD mutants from six proteins (hnRNPA1, TDP43, FUS, EWSR1, RBM14, and TIA1). Our simulations reveal the existence of scaling laws that quantify the range of change in the critical solution temperature of PLDs as a function of the number and type of amino acid sequence mutations. These rules are consistent with the physicochemical properties of the mutations and extend across the entire family tested, suggesting that scaling laws can be used as tools to predict changes in the stability of PLD condensates. Our work offers a quantitative lens into how the emergent behavior of PLD solutions vary in response to physicochemical changes of single PLD molecules.