Neural representation of abstract task structure during generalization

  1. Avinash Rao Vaidya  Is a corresponding author
  2. Henry M Jones
  3. Johanny Castillo
  4. David Badre
  1. Brown University, United States
  2. Stanford University, United States
  3. University of Massachusetts Amherst, United States

Abstract

Cognitive models in psychology and neuroscience widely assume that the human brain maintains an abstract representation of tasks. This assumption is fundamental to theories explaining how we learn quickly, think creatively, and act flexibly. However, neural evidence for a verifiably generative abstract task representation has been lacking. Here, we report an experimental paradigm that requires forming such a representation to act adaptively in novel conditions without feedback. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we observed that abstract task structure was represented within left mid-lateral prefrontal cortex, bilateral precuneus and inferior parietal cortex. These results provide support for the neural instantiation of the long-supposed abstract task representation in a setting where we can verify its influence. Such a representation can afford massive expansions of behavioral flexibility without additional experience, a vital characteristic of human cognition.

Data availability

Complete behavioral data from all participants who completed all three sessions of this experiment, un-thresholded statistical maps for whole-brain analyses and beta coefficients for ROI-level analyses have been deposited on the project site for this experiment on the Open Science Framework.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Avinash Rao Vaidya

    Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, United States
    For correspondence
    avinash_vaidya@brown.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5423-5655
  2. Henry M Jones

    Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Johanny Castillo

    Department of Psychology and Brain Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. David Badre

    Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    David Badre, Reviewing editor, eLife.

Funding

Office of Naval Research (N00014-16-1-2832)

  • David Badre

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R25GM125500)

  • Johanny Castillo
  • David Badre

National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH116592)

  • Avinash Rao Vaidya

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants gave their written informed consent to participate in this study, as approved by the Human Research Protections Office at Brown University, and were compensated for their participation.

Copyright

© 2021, Vaidya et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,865
    views
  • 637
    downloads
  • 39
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Avinash Rao Vaidya
  2. Henry M Jones
  3. Johanny Castillo
  4. David Badre
(2021)
Neural representation of abstract task structure during generalization
eLife 10:e63226.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63226

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63226

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Xingsen Zhao, Qihang Sun ... Xuekun Li
    Research Article

    Williams syndrome (WS; OMIM#194050) is a rare disorder, which is caused by the microdeletion of one copy of 25–27 genes, and WS patients display diverse neuronal deficits. Although remarkable progresses have been achieved, the mechanisms for these distinct deficits are still largely unknown. Here, we have shown that neural progenitor cells (NPCs) in WS forebrain organoids display abnormal proliferation and differentiation capabilities, and synapse formation. Genes with altered expression are related to neuronal development and neurogenesis. Single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data analysis revealed 13 clusters in healthy control and WS organoids. WS organoids show an aberrant generation of excitatory neurons. Mechanistically, the expression of transthyretin (TTR) are remarkably decreased in WS forebrain organoids. We have found that GTF2IRD1 encoded by one WS associated gene GTF2IRD1 binds to TTR promoter regions and regulates the expression of TTR. In addition, exogenous TTR can activate ERK signaling and rescue neurogenic deficits of WS forebrain organoids. Gtf2ird1-deficient mice display similar neurodevelopmental deficits as observed in WS organoids. Collectively, our study reveals critical function of GTF2IRD1 in regulating neurodevelopment of WS forebrain organoids and mice through regulating TTR-ERK pathway.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jian Qiu, Margaritis Voliotis ... Martin J Kelly
    Research Article

    Hypothalamic kisspeptin (Kiss1) neurons are vital for pubertal development and reproduction. Arcuate nucleus Kiss1 (Kiss1ARH) neurons are responsible for the pulsatile release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). In females, the behavior of Kiss1ARH neurons, expressing Kiss1, neurokinin B (NKB), and dynorphin (Dyn), varies throughout the ovarian cycle. Studies indicate that 17β-estradiol (E2) reduces peptide expression but increases Slc17a6 (Vglut2) mRNA and glutamate neurotransmission in these neurons, suggesting a shift from peptidergic to glutamatergic signaling. To investigate this shift, we combined transcriptomics, electrophysiology, and mathematical modeling. Our results demonstrate that E2 treatment upregulates the mRNA expression of voltage-activated calcium channels, elevating the whole-cell calcium current that contributes to high-frequency burst firing. Additionally, E2 treatment decreased the mRNA levels of canonical transient receptor potential (TPRC) 5 and G protein-coupled K+ (GIRK) channels. When Trpc5 channels in Kiss1ARH neurons were deleted using CRISPR/SaCas9, the slow excitatory postsynaptic potential was eliminated. Our data enabled us to formulate a biophysically realistic mathematical model of Kiss1ARH neurons, suggesting that E2 modifies ionic conductances in these neurons, enabling the transition from high-frequency synchronous firing through NKB-driven activation of TRPC5 channels to a short bursting mode facilitating glutamate release. In a low E2 milieu, synchronous firing of Kiss1ARH neurons drives pulsatile release of GnRH, while the transition to burst firing with high, preovulatory levels of E2 would facilitate the GnRH surge through its glutamatergic synaptic connection to preoptic Kiss1 neurons.