Neural representation of abstract task structure during generalization

  1. Avinash Rao Vaidya  Is a corresponding author
  2. Henry M Jones
  3. Johanny Castillo
  4. David Badre
  1. Brown University, United States
  2. Stanford University, United States
  3. University of Massachusetts Amherst, United States

Abstract

Cognitive models in psychology and neuroscience widely assume that the human brain maintains an abstract representation of tasks. This assumption is fundamental to theories explaining how we learn quickly, think creatively, and act flexibly. However, neural evidence for a verifiably generative abstract task representation has been lacking. Here, we report an experimental paradigm that requires forming such a representation to act adaptively in novel conditions without feedback. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we observed that abstract task structure was represented within left mid-lateral prefrontal cortex, bilateral precuneus and inferior parietal cortex. These results provide support for the neural instantiation of the long-supposed abstract task representation in a setting where we can verify its influence. Such a representation can afford massive expansions of behavioral flexibility without additional experience, a vital characteristic of human cognition.

Data availability

Complete behavioral data from all participants who completed all three sessions of this experiment, un-thresholded statistical maps for whole-brain analyses and beta coefficients for ROI-level analyses have been deposited on the project site for this experiment on the Open Science Framework.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Avinash Rao Vaidya

    Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, United States
    For correspondence
    avinash_vaidya@brown.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5423-5655
  2. Henry M Jones

    Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Johanny Castillo

    Department of Psychology and Brain Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. David Badre

    Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    David Badre, Reviewing editor, eLife.

Funding

Office of Naval Research (N00014-16-1-2832)

  • David Badre

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R25GM125500)

  • Johanny Castillo
  • David Badre

National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH116592)

  • Avinash Rao Vaidya

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mimi Liljeholm, University of California, Irvine, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants gave their written informed consent to participate in this study, as approved by the Human Research Protections Office at Brown University, and were compensated for their participation.

Version history

  1. Received: September 18, 2020
  2. Accepted: March 16, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 17, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 31, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Vaidya et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,491
    Page views
  • 576
    Downloads
  • 17
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Avinash Rao Vaidya
  2. Henry M Jones
  3. Johanny Castillo
  4. David Badre
(2021)
Neural representation of abstract task structure during generalization
eLife 10:e63226.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63226

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63226

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Songyao Zhang, Tuo Zhang ... Tianming Liu
    Research Article

    Cortical folding is an important feature of primate brains that plays a crucial role in various cognitive and behavioral processes. Extensive research has revealed both similarities and differences in folding morphology and brain function among primates including macaque and human. The folding morphology is the basis of brain function, making cross-species studies on folding morphology important for understanding brain function and species evolution. However, prior studies on cross-species folding morphology mainly focused on partial regions of the cortex instead of the entire brain. Previously, our research defined a whole-brain landmark based on folding morphology: the gyral peak. It was found to exist stably across individuals and ages in both human and macaque brains. Shared and unique gyral peaks in human and macaque are identified in this study, and their similarities and differences in spatial distribution, anatomical morphology, and functional connectivity were also dicussed.

    1. Neuroscience
    Avani Koparkar, Timothy L Warren ... Lena Veit
    Research Article

    Complex skills like speech and dance are composed of ordered sequences of simpler elements, but the neuronal basis for the syntactic ordering of actions is poorly understood. Birdsong is a learned vocal behavior composed of syntactically ordered syllables, controlled in part by the songbird premotor nucleus HVC (proper name). Here, we test whether one of HVC’s recurrent inputs, mMAN (medial magnocellular nucleus of the anterior nidopallium), contributes to sequencing in adult male Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata domestica). Bengalese finch song includes several patterns: (1) chunks, comprising stereotyped syllable sequences; (2) branch points, where a given syllable can be followed probabilistically by multiple syllables; and (3) repeat phrases, where individual syllables are repeated variable numbers of times. We found that following bilateral lesions of mMAN, acoustic structure of syllables remained largely intact, but sequencing became more variable, as evidenced by ‘breaks’ in previously stereotyped chunks, increased uncertainty at branch points, and increased variability in repeat numbers. Our results show that mMAN contributes to the variable sequencing of vocal elements in Bengalese finch song and demonstrate the influence of recurrent projections to HVC. Furthermore, they highlight the utility of species with complex syntax in investigating neuronal control of ordered sequences.