Optimized Vivid-derived Magnets photodimerizers for subcellular optogenetics in mammalian cells

  1. Lorena Benedetti
  2. Jonathan S Marvin
  3. Hanieh Falahati
  4. Andres Guillén-Samander
  5. Loren L Looger  Is a corresponding author
  6. Pietro De Camilli  Is a corresponding author
  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale School of Medicine, United States
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Light-inducible dimerization protein modules enable precise temporal and spatial control of biological processes in non-invasive fashion. Among them, Magnets are small modules engineered from the Neurospora crassa photoreceptor Vivid by orthogonalizing the homodimerization interface into complementary heterodimers. Both Magnets components, which are well-tolerated as protein fusion partners, are photoreceptors requiring simultaneous photoactivation to interact, enabling high spatiotemporal confinement of dimerization with a single-excitation wavelength. However, Magnets require concatemerization for efficient responses and cell preincubation at 28oC to be functional. Here we overcome these limitations by engineering an optimized Magnets pair requiring neither concatemerization nor low temperature preincubation. We validated these 'enhanced' Magnets (eMags) by using them to rapidly and reversibly recruit proteins to subcellular organelles, to induce organelle contacts, and to reconstitute OSBP-VAP ER-Golgi tethering implicated in phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate transport and metabolism. eMags represent a very effective tool to optogenetically manipulate physiological processes over whole cells or in small subcellular volumes.

Data availability

The constructs generated in this study will be available in Addgene (#162243-162255). All data generated in the mutagenesis screen can be found in Supplementary File 3. The complete list of primers used for the mutagenesis can be found in Supplementary Files 4, 5. Primers used for cloning are reported in the Key Resources Table. The sequences of the enhanced Magnets mutants generated have been deposited in Genebank: eMagAF (GenBank accession number: MW203024), eMagBF (GenBank accession number: MW203025), eMagA (GenBank accession number: MW203026), eMagB (GenBank accession number: MW203027). All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 and associated supplements.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lorena Benedetti

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jonathan S Marvin

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Hanieh Falahati

    Neuroscience, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Andres Guillén-Samander

    Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Loren L Looger

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    For correspondence
    loogerl@janelia.hhmi.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Pietro De Camilli

    Departments of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    pietro.decamilli@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9045-0723

Funding

National Institutes of Health (NS36251)

  • Pietro De Camilli

National Institutes of Health (P30DK045735)

  • Pietro De Camilli

National Institutes of Health (DA018343)

  • Pietro De Camilli

Jung Foundation for Science and Research

  • Andres Guillén-Samander

HHMI Life Sciences Associate

  • Hanieh Falahati

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Melike Lakadamyali, University of Pennsylvania, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures involving the use of mice were performed in agreement with the Yale University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (protocol number 2018-07422), and with the Janelia Farm Research Campus Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Institutional Biosafety Committee (protocol number 18-173).

Version history

  1. Received: September 18, 2020
  2. Accepted: November 10, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 11, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 14, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Benedetti et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,898
    views
  • 938
    downloads
  • 42
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lorena Benedetti
  2. Jonathan S Marvin
  3. Hanieh Falahati
  4. Andres Guillén-Samander
  5. Loren L Looger
  6. Pietro De Camilli
(2020)
Optimized Vivid-derived Magnets photodimerizers for subcellular optogenetics in mammalian cells
eLife 9:e63230.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63230

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63230

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Birol Cabukusta, Shalom Borst Pauwels ... Jacques Neefjes
    Research Article

    Numerous lipids are heterogeneously distributed among organelles. Most lipid trafficking between organelles is achieved by a group of lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) that carry lipids using their hydrophobic cavities. The human genome encodes many intracellular LTPs responsible for lipid trafficking and the function of many LTPs in defining cellular lipid levels and distributions is unclear. Here, we created a gene knockout library targeting 90 intracellular LTPs and performed whole-cell lipidomics analysis. This analysis confirmed known lipid disturbances and identified new ones caused by the loss of LTPs. Among these, we found major sphingolipid imbalances in ORP9 and ORP11 knockout cells, two proteins of previously unknown function in sphingolipid metabolism. ORP9 and ORP11 form a heterodimer to localize at the ER-trans-Golgi membrane contact sites, where the dimer exchanges phosphatidylserine (PS) for phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PI(4)P) between the two organelles. Consequently, loss of either protein causes phospholipid imbalances in the Golgi apparatus that result in lowered sphingomyelin synthesis at this organelle. Overall, our LTP knockout library toolbox identifies various proteins in control of cellular lipid levels, including the ORP9-ORP11 heterodimer, which exchanges PS and PI(4)P at the ER-Golgi membrane contact site as a critical step in sphingomyelin synthesis in the Golgi apparatus.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Georg Kislinger, Gunar Fabig ... Martina Schifferer
    Tools and Resources

    Like other volume electron microscopy approaches, automated tape-collecting ultramicrotomy (ATUM) enables imaging of serial sections deposited on thick plastic tapes by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). ATUM is unique in enabling hierarchical imaging and thus efficient screening for target structures, as needed for correlative light and electron microscopy. However, SEM of sections on tape can only access the section surface, thereby limiting the axial resolution to the typical size of cellular vesicles with an order of magnitude lower than the acquired xy resolution. In contrast, serial-section electron tomography (ET), a transmission electron microscopy-based approach, yields isotropic voxels at full EM resolution, but requires deposition of sections on electron-stable thin and fragile films, thus making screening of large section libraries difficult and prone to section loss. To combine the strength of both approaches, we developed ‘ATUM-Tomo, a hybrid method, where sections are first reversibly attached to plastic tape via a dissolvable coating, and after screening detached and transferred to the ET-compatible thin films. As a proof-of-principle, we applied correlative ATUM-Tomo to study ultrastructural features of blood-brain barrier (BBB) leakiness around microthrombi in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. Microthrombi and associated sites of BBB leakiness were identified by confocal imaging of injected fluorescent and electron-dense nanoparticles, then relocalized by ATUM-SEM, and finally interrogated by correlative ATUM-Tomo. Overall, our new ATUM-Tomo approach will substantially advance ultrastructural analysis of biological phenomena that require cell- and tissue-level contextualization of the finest subcellular textures.