Hormone-sensitive lipase couples intergenerational sterol metabolism to reproductive success

  1. Christoph Heier  Is a corresponding author
  2. Oskar Knittelfelder
  3. Harald F Hofbauer
  4. Wolfgang Mende
  5. Ingrid Pörnbacher
  6. Laura Schiller
  7. Gabriele Schoiswohl
  8. Hao Xie
  9. Sebastian Grönke
  10. Andrej Shevchenko
  11. Ronald P Kühnlein
  1. University of Graz, Austria
  2. Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Germany
  3. Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Germany

Abstract

Triacylglycerol (TG) and steryl ester (SE) lipid storage is a universal strategy to maintain organismal energy and membrane homeostasis. Cycles of building and mobilizing storage fat are fundamental in (re)distributing lipid substrates between tissues or to progress ontogenetic transitions. In this study we show that Hormone-sensitive lipase (Hsl) specifically controls SE mobilization to initiate intergenerational sterol transfer in Drosophila melanogaster. Tissue-autonomous Hsl functions in the maternal fat body and germline coordinately prevent adult SE overstorage and maximize sterol allocation to embryos. While Hsl-deficiency is largely dispensable for normal development on sterol-rich diets, animals depend on adipocyte Hsl for optimal fecundity when dietary sterol becomes limiting. Notably, accumulation of SE but not of TG is a characteristic of Hsl-deficient cells across phyla including murine white adipocytes. In summary, we identified Hsl as an ancestral regulator of SE degradation, which improves intergenerational sterol transfer and reproductive success in flies.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Christoph Heier

    Institute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
    For correspondence
    christoph.heier@uni-graz.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6858-408X
  2. Oskar Knittelfelder

    Shevchenko lab, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1565-7238
  3. Harald F Hofbauer

    Institute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2617-5901
  4. Wolfgang Mende

    Institute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ingrid Pörnbacher

    Institute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Laura Schiller

    Institute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Gabriele Schoiswohl

    Institute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Hao Xie

    Institute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Sebastian Grönke

    Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1539-5346
  10. Andrej Shevchenko

    Shevchenko lab, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5079-1109
  11. Ronald P Kühnlein

    Institute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (P28882-B21)

  • Gabriele Schoiswohl

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR 2682)

  • Andrej Shevchenko

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR83 (TP17))

  • Andrej Shevchenko

Austrian Science Fund (M 2706-B34)

  • Ingrid Pörnbacher

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal protocols were approved by the Austrian Federal Ministry for Science, Research, and Economy (protocol number BMWFW-66.007/0026/-WF/V/3b/2017) and the ethics committee of the University of Graz, and were conducted in compliance with the council of Europe Convention (ETS 123).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Joel K Elmquist, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: September 28, 2020
  2. Accepted: February 3, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 4, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 12, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Heier et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,379
    Page views
  • 199
    Downloads
  • 5
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Christoph Heier
  2. Oskar Knittelfelder
  3. Harald F Hofbauer
  4. Wolfgang Mende
  5. Ingrid Pörnbacher
  6. Laura Schiller
  7. Gabriele Schoiswohl
  8. Hao Xie
  9. Sebastian Grönke
  10. Andrej Shevchenko
  11. Ronald P Kühnlein
(2021)
Hormone-sensitive lipase couples intergenerational sterol metabolism to reproductive success
eLife 10:e63252.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63252

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Sudipta Mondal et al.
    Research Article

    Chain-length specific subsets of diacylglycerol (DAG) lipids are proposed to regulate differential physiological responses ranging from signal transduction to modulation of the membrane properties. However, the mechanism or molecular players regulating the subsets of DAG species remains unknown. Here, we uncover the role of a conserved eukaryotic protein family, DISCO-interacting protein 2 (DIP2) as a homeostatic regulator of a chemically distinct subset of DAGs using yeast, fly and mouse models. Genetic and chemical screens along with lipidomics analysis in yeast reveal that DIP2 prevents the toxic accumulation of specific DAGs in the logarithmic growth phase, which otherwise leads to endoplasmic reticulum stress. We also show that the fatty acyl-AMP ligase-like domains of DIP2 are essential for the redirection of the flux of DAG subspecies to storage lipid, triacylglycerols. DIP2 is associated with vacuoles through mitochondria-vacuole contact sites and such modulation of selective DAG abundance by DIP2 is found to be crucial for optimal vacuole membrane fusion and consequently osmoadaptation in yeast. Thus, the study illuminates an unprecedented DAG metabolism route and provides new insights on how cell fine-tunes DAG subspecies for cellular homeostasis and environmental adaptation.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Atanas Radkov et al.
    Research Article

    Members of the bacterial T6SS amidase effector (Tae) superfamily of toxins are delivered between competing bacteria to degrade cell wall peptidoglycan. Although Taes share a common substrate, they exhibit distinct antimicrobial potency across different competitor species. To investigate the molecular basis governing these differences, we quantitatively defined the functional determinants of Tae1 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 using a combination of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and a high-throughput in vivo genetic approach called deep mutational scanning (DMS). As expected, combined analyses confirmed the role of critical residues near the Tae1 catalytic center. Unexpectedly, DMS revealed substantial contributions to enzymatic activity from a much larger, ring-like functional hot spot extending around the entire circumference of the enzyme. Comparative DMS across distinct growth conditions highlighted how functional contribution of different surfaces is highly context-dependent, varying alongside composition of targeted cell walls. These observations suggest that Tae1 engages with the intact cell wall network through a more distributed three-dimensional interaction interface than previously appreciated, providing an explanation for observed differences in antimicrobial potency across divergent Gram-negative competitors. Further binding studies of several Tae1 variants with their cognate immunity protein demonstrate that requirements to maintain protection from Tae activity may be a significant constraint on the mutational landscape of tae1 toxicity in the wild. In total, our work reveals that Tae diversification has likely been shaped by multiple independent pressures to maintain interactions with binding partners that vary across bacterial species and conditions.