Abstract

The circadian clock component NR1D1 (REVERBα) is considered a dominant regulator of lipid metabolism, with global Nr1d1 deletion driving dysregulation of white adipose tissue (WAT) lipogenesis and obesity. However, a similar phenotype is not observed under adipocyte-selective deletion (Nr1d1Flox2-6:AdipoqCre), and transcriptional pro1ling demonstrates that, under basal conditions, direct targets of NR1D1 regulation are limited, and include the circadian clock and collagen dynamics. Under high-fat diet (HFD) feeding, Nr1d1Flox2-6:AdipoqCre mice do manifest profound obesity, yet without the accompanying WAT in2ammation and 1brosis exhibited by controls. Integration of the WAT NR1D1 cistrome with differential gene expression reveals broad control of metabolic processes by NR1D1 which is unmasked in the obese state. Adipocyte NR1D1 does not drive an anticipatory daily rhythm in WAT lipogenesis, but rather modulates WAT activity in response to alterations in metabolic state. Importantly, NR1D1 action in adipocytes is critical to the development of obesity-related WAT pathology and insulin resistance.

Data availability

RNA-seq data generated in the course of this study has been uploaded to ArrayExpress and is available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MTAB-8840. For reviewer access, the following login details can be used: username "Reviewer_E-MTAB-8840", password "IGGB44Tx". ChIP-seq data generated in the course of this study has been uploaded to ArrayExpress and is available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MTAB-10573. For reviewer access, the follow690ing login details can be used: username "Reviewer_E-MTAB-10573", password "nncbrjdh". Access to these datasets will be opened to the public upon acceptance of themanuscript. Raw proteomics data has been uploaded to Mendeley Data . Output of 'omics analyses (proteomics, edgeR, stageR, ReactomePA outputs, peak calling) are provided in the Source Data Files.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ann Louise Hunter

    Centre for Biological Timing, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3874-4852
  2. Charlotte E Pelekanou

    Centre for Biological Timing, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Nichola J Barron

    Centre for Biological Timing, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Rebecca C Northeast

    Centre for Biological Timing, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3121-2802
  5. Magdalena Grudzien

    Centre for Biological Timing, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Antony D Adamson

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Polly Downton

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1617-6153
  8. Thomas Cornfield

    OCDEM, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Peter S Cunningham

    Centre for Biological Timing, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Jean-Noel Billaud

    QIAGEN Bioinformatics, Redwood City, United States
    Competing interests
    Jean-Noel Billaud, J-N.B. is an employee of Qiagen..
  11. Leanne Hodson

    OCDEM, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Andrew Loudon

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Richard D Unwin

    Stoller Biomarker Discovery Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Mudassar Iqbal

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. David Ray

    OCDEM, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. David A Bechtold

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    david.bechtold@manchester.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8676-8704

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/I018654/1)

  • David A Bechtold

Medical Research Council (MR/N021479/1)

  • Ann Louise Hunter

Medical Research Council (MR/P00279X/1)

  • David A Bechtold

Medical Research Council (MR/P011853/1)

  • David Ray

Medical Research Council (MR/P023576/1)

  • David Ray

Wellcome Trust (107849/Z/15/Z)

  • David Ray

Wellcome Trust (107851/Z/15/Z)

  • David Ray

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments described here were conducted in accordance with local requirements and licenced under the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, project licence number 70/8558 (licence holder Dr. David A Bechtold). Procedures were approved by the University of Manchester Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body (AWERB).

Copyright

© 2021, Hunter et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,296
    views
  • 557
    downloads
  • 32
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ann Louise Hunter
  2. Charlotte E Pelekanou
  3. Nichola J Barron
  4. Rebecca C Northeast
  5. Magdalena Grudzien
  6. Antony D Adamson
  7. Polly Downton
  8. Thomas Cornfield
  9. Peter S Cunningham
  10. Jean-Noel Billaud
  11. Leanne Hodson
  12. Andrew Loudon
  13. Richard D Unwin
  14. Mudassar Iqbal
  15. David Ray
  16. David A Bechtold
(2021)
Adipocyte NR1D1 dictates adipose tissue expansion during obesity
eLife 10:e63324.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63324

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63324

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Jingjing Li, Xinyue Wang ... Vincent Archambault
    Research Article

    In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.