Neural dynamics of semantic categorization in semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia
Figures
![](https://iiif.elifesciences.org/lax/63905%2Felife-63905-fig1-v2.tif/full/617,/0/default.jpg)
Experimental paradigm, behavioral performance, and cortical atrophy.
(A) Cartoon representation of the experimental setting. Colored drawings were presented for 2 s, with an inter-stimuli interval jittered between 1.7 and 2.1 s. Subjects responded with a button press with their dominant hand. (B) Behavioral performance during the semantic categorization tasks in controls and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) patients, across the two stimuli conditions (living vs. nonliving items). There were no statistically significant effects of diagnosis, category, nor their interaction neither in percentage accuracy (healthy controls [HC]: living: 97.1 ± 6.6, nonliving: 96.8 ± 6.6; svPPA: living: 91.5 ± 6.2, nonliving: 95.9 ± 8.1) nor in reaction times (HC: living: 826.3 ± 112.5, nonliving: 856.9 ± 104.4; svPPA: living: 869.8 ± 179.8, nonliving: 911.1 ± 194.45). (C) Voxel-based morphometry (VBM)-derived atrophy pattern showing significantly reduced gray matter volumes in svPPA patients’ anterior temporal lobes, views from top to bottom: lateral, medial, ventral (thresholded at p<0.05 with family-wise error [FWE] correction, cluster threshold of 100 voxels).
![](https://iiif.elifesciences.org/lax/63905%2Felife-63905-fig2-v2.tif/full/full/0/default.jpg)
Stimulus-locked (0 ms = stimulus onset) within-group analyses of task-related changes in oscillatory power.
(a) Rendering of the results in the high-gamma band for both controls (healthy controls [HC], upper row) and patients (semantic variant primary progressive aphasia [svPPA], lower row). Cold color = more desynchronization (vs. baseline). Warm color = more synchronization (vs. baseline). (c-e) Same as in (a) but for the low-gamma, beta, alpha, and theta band, respectively. Within-group analyses were performed, with no additional smoothing, on normalized reconstructions using statistical nonparametric mapping (SnPM one-sample, two-tailed t-test against baseline).
![](https://iiif.elifesciences.org/lax/63905%2Felife-63905-fig3-v2.tif/full/617,/0/default.jpg)
Stimulus-locked (0 ms = stimulus onset) between-group analyses of changes in oscillatory power.
Rendering of the results in the high-gamma (a), low-gamma (b), beta (c), alpha (d), and theta (e) bands. Purple color = more synchronization in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) (vs. healthy controls [HC]). Brown color = less synchronization in svPPA (vs. HC). Table 2 summarizes the temporal windows, peaks of local maxima, and t-values of all clusters isolated by the direct comparison of the two cohorts. Between-group analyses were performed, with no additional smoothing, on normalized reconstructions using statistical nonparametric mapping (SnPM two-sample, two-tailed t-test).
![](https://iiif.elifesciences.org/lax/63905%2Felife-63905-fig4-v2.tif/full/617,/0/default.jpg)
Results of the region of interest post hoc analysis.
Three regions-of-interest (ROIs) of 20 mm radius were centered on the occipital pole (OCC, Montreal Neurological Institute [MNI]: −10, –94, −16), left ventral occipito-temporal cortex (VOT, MNI: −50, –52, −20), and left ATL (MNI: −30, –6, −40). Pink color represents healthy controls data, light blue svPPA patients. Shaded areas indicate the standard deviation around the group average (i.e., solid line).
![](https://iiif.elifesciences.org/lax/63905%2Felife-63905-fig5-v2.tif/full/617,/0/default.jpg)
Results of the post hoc regions of interest analysis of power changes.
Full time-frequency plot of power changes in two representative voxels centered in the peak of activation (as per group results, Montreal Neurological Institute [MNI]: −34.8, –93.9, 2.7) and on the occipital pole (OCC, MNI: −10, –94, −16).
Tables
Demographics and neuropsychological profiles.
Healthy controls and semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) patients, native English speakers, were matched for age, gender, and education. Scores shown are mean (standard deviation). * Indicates values significantly different from controls (p<0.05). MMSE = Mini-Mental State Exam; CDR = Clinical Dementia Rating; PPVT = Picture Vocabulary Test; WAB = Western Aphasia Battery; VOSP = Visual Object and Space Perception Battery.
Controls | svPPA | |
---|---|---|
Demographic | ||
N | 18 | 18 |
Age, mean (SD) | 70.7 ± 6.5 | 67.1 ± 6.2 |
Education, mean (SD) | 17.5 ± 1.8 | 17.9 ± 3.2 |
Gender, n female | 12 | 9 |
Handedness, n right | 15 | 15 |
MMSE (max. 30) | 29.0 ± 1.6 | 24.5 ± 3.8* |
CDR score | 0.03 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.4* |
CDR box score | 0.3 ± 1.2 | 4.0 ± 2.6* |
Language production | ||
Boston (object) naming test (15) | 14.7 ± 0.6 | 5.4 ± 3.7* |
Phonemic (D-letter) fluency | 15.7 ± 5.8 | 9.1 ± 4.3* |
Semantic (animal) fluency | 23.4 ± 3.9 | 9.3 ± 4.1* |
Language comprehension | ||
PPVT (max. 16) | – | 9.4 ± 3.2 |
WAB auditory word recognition (60) | – | 56.5 ± 4.2 |
WAB sequential command (100) | – | 70.7 ± 14.3 |
Digit span forwards | 7.1 ± 1.1 | 6.4 ± 1.2 |
Reading | ||
Arizona reading total (max. 36) | 35.6 ± 0.5 | 30.5 ± 3.7* |
Regular high-frequency words (9) | 9 ± 0.0 | 8.8 ± 0.4 |
Regular low-frequency words (9) | 8.9 ± 0.2 | 8.3 ± 1.2 |
Irregular high-frequency words (9) | 8.9 ± 0.3 | 7.7 ± 0.6 |
Irregular low-frequency words (9) | 8.8 ± 0.4 | 5.7 ± 2.3 |
Pseudowords (18) | 15.8 ± 2.7 | 15.2 ± 2.2 |
Spelling | ||
Arizona spelling total (max. 20) | 18.1 ± 1.6 | 13.1 ± 4.0* |
Regular high-frequency words (5) | 5 ± 0.0 | 4.4 ± 0.9 |
Regular low-frequency words (5) | 4.5 ± 0.6 | 4.1 ± 0.8 |
Irregular high-frequency words (5) | 4.1 ± 0.9 | 2.1 ± 1.6 |
Irregular low-frequency words (5) | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 1.6 |
Pseudowords (10) | 8.8 ± 1.3 | 8.1 ± 2.6 |
Famous faces – spontaneous naming (max. 16) | 12.4 ± 3.4 | 2.9 ± 2.4* |
Famous faces – face recognition (max 20) | 18.4 ± 2.0 | 12.8 ± 6.5* |
Famous faces short triplets, pictures (max. 10) | 8.9 ± 1.0 | 6.6 ± 2.4 |
Famous faces short triplets, words (max. 10) | 9.7 ± 0.6 | 7.0 ± 2.0 |
Working memory/executive functions | ||
Digit span backwards | 5.4 ± 1.1 | 4.5 ± 1.6* |
Modified trials (total time) | 25.3 ± 13.6 | 41.9 ± 23.1* |
Modified trials (# of correct lines) | 13.2 ± 3.2 | 13.2 ± 3.3 |
Design fluency (# of correct designs) | 11.7 ± 3.0 | 7.1 ± 3.4* |
Visuospatial function | ||
Benson figure copy (17) | 15.7 ± 0.7 | 15.3 ± 1.0 |
VOSP number location (30) | 9.3 ± 0.9 | 9.0 ± 1.5 |
Visual memory | ||
Benson figure recall (17) | 12.1 ± 2.4 | 7.1 ± 4.9* |
Local maxima in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinates.
Time window, MNI coordinates, p- and t-value of the local maxima of the different magnetoencephalographic (MEG) whole brain contrasts performed. The spatiotemporal distribution of these clusters at four exemplar time points can be appreciated in Figure 3.
Time window | Local maxima | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
t-test svPPA vs. HC | ms | MNI [x,y,z] | p-value | t-value | |
Theta band [3–7 Hz] | |||||
Left lingual gyrus | 0–212 | −10.0 –100.0 −10.0 | 0.005 | 3.7 | More ERD in svPPA |
Left lingual gyrus | 412–612 | −8.5 –100.0 −8.1 | 0.005 | 3.1 | More ERD in svPPA |
Right medial and superior frontal gyrus | 187–387 | 18.6 61.4 –14.7 | 0.001 | −3.92 | Less ERS in svPPA |
Alpha band [8–12 Hz] | |||||
Right precentral gyrus | 212–612 | 45.0 –15.0 40.0 | 0.001 | 3.4 | More ERD in svPPA |
Left middle temporal gyrus | 287–362 | −59.8 –41.6 −1.0 | 0.005 | 2.8 | More ERD in svPPA |
Bilateral medial and orbital frontal gyrus | 462–612 | −6.2 34.3 –24.9 | 0.001 | 5.1 | More ERS in svPPA |
Beta band [12–30 Hz] | |||||
Left cingulate cortex | 0–62 | −6.2–30.3 43.3 | 0.005 | 2.9 | More ERS in svPPA |
Right medial frontal gyrus | 137–262 | 7.8 56.8 11.7 | 0.001 | 3.6 | More ERS in svPPA |
Left middle temporal gyrus | 237–362 | −65.0 –20.0 −5.0 | 0.001 | −3.4 | Less ERD in svPPA |
Left superior frontal gyrus | 587–612 | −21.8 46.7 45.7 | 0.005 | −3.1 | Less ERD in svPPA |
Low-gamma band [30–55 Hz] | |||||
Left lingual gyrus | 62–612 | −10.1–98.4 −8.9 | 0.001 | 4.2 | More ERS in svPPA |
Left inferior occipital gyrus | 362–612 | −34.8 –93.9 2.7 | 0.001 | 4.1 | More ERS in svPPA |
Right lingual gyrus | 212–437 | 18.2 –89.1 8.3 | 0.005 | 3.4 | More ERS in svPPA |
Right medial frontal gyrus | 212–412 | 9.3 63.0 2.2 | 0.001 | 3.7 | Less ERD in svPPA |
Left superior frontal gyrus | 262–462 | −3.8 62.8 14.0 | 0.005 | 3.6 | Less ERD in svPPA |
High-gamma band [63–117 Hz] | |||||
Left superior frontal gyrus | 62–137 | −36.5 26.6 48.8 | 0.001 | 3.4 | More ERS in svPPA |
Left superior temporal gyrus | 62–287 | −48.2 –22.3 13.3 | 0.005 | 3 | More ERS in svPPA |
Left parahippocampal gyrus | 212–312 | −15.5 –27.1 −6.5 | 0.001 | 3.3 | More ERS in svPPA |
Right medial frontal gyrus | 287–337 | 13.2 70.7 0.6 | 0.005 | 3.2 | More ERS in svPPA |
Left superior frontal gyrus | 287–612 | −22 68.4 14 | 0.001 | 3.6 | More ERS in svPPA |
Right superior frontal gyrus | 462–612 | 43.9 54.7 17.2 | 0.001 | 3.9 | More ERS in svPPA |
Psycholinguistic characteristics of the stimuli.
Stimuli consisted of 70 colored drawings illustrating living items (n = 36) or nonliving items (n = 34). Length, imaginability, concreteness, and familiarity (norm) were extracted from the Medical Research Council (MRC) Psycholinguistic Database searching for the most common label for each item. Similarly, frequency was extracted from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Category agreement, category prototypicality, and familiarity (quest.) were assessed with a behavioral study on separate age-matched healthy controls. As a proxy for visual complexity, we used Shannon entropy as computed with Scikit-Image. Values shown are mean (standard deviation). * Indicate values significantly different between the two categories (two-tailed t-test, p<0.05).
Living items | Nonliving items | ||
---|---|---|---|
N | 36 | 34 | |
Examples | Fish, flower | Scissors, train | |
Frequency (log) | 3.69 (0.54) | 3.96 (0.65) | |
Length (# of letters) | 5.29 (1.58) | 5.61 (1.84) | |
Imageability | 613.19 (19.62) | 596.43 (28.08) | * |
Familiarity (norm) | 498.26 (69.32) | 547.96 (45.82) | * |
Familiarity (quest.) | 6.15 (0.32) | 6.67 (0.21) | * |
Concreteness | 608.27 (16.26) | 599.10 (25.94) | |
Category agreement | 96.86 (4.07) | 99.18 (1.20) | * |
Category prototypicality | 6.24 (0.52) | 6.47 (0.32) | * |
Visual complexity | 3.04 (0.84) | 3.13 (0.96) |