Quantitative glycoproteomics reveals substrate selectivity of the ER protein quality control sensors UGGT1 and UGGT2

  1. Benjamin M Adams
  2. Nathan P Canniff
  3. Kevin P Guay
  4. Ida Signe Bohse Larsen
  5. Daniel N Hebert  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Massachusetts, United States
  2. University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

UDP-glucose: glycoprotein glucosyltransferase (UGGT) 1 and 2 are central hubs in the chaperone network of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), acting as gatekeepers to the early secretory pathway yet little is known about their cellular clients. These two quality control sensors control lectin chaperone binding and glycoprotein egress from ER. A quantitative glycoproteomics strategy was deployed to identify cellular substrates of the UGGTs at endogenous levels in CRISPR-edited HEK293 cells. The seventy-one UGGT substrates identified were mainly large multidomain and heavily glycosylated proteins when compared to the general N-glycoproteome. UGGT1 was the dominant glucosyltransferase with a preference towards large plasma membrane proteins whereas UGGT2 favored the modification of smaller, soluble lysosomal proteins. This study sheds light on differential specificities and roles of UGGT1 and UGGT2 and provides insight into the cellular reliance on carbohydrate-dependent chaperone system to facilitate proper folding and maturation of the cellular N-glycoproteome.

Data availability

All data generated during this study are included in the manuscript or supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Benjamin M Adams

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nathan P Canniff

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kevin P Guay

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ida Signe Bohse Larsen

    Copenhagen Center for Glycomics, Departments of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Daniel N Hebert

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States
    For correspondence
    dhebert@biochem.umass.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1537-4446

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM086874)

  • Daniel N Hebert

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008515)

  • Benjamin M Adams
  • Nathan P Canniff

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Adams et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,213
    views
  • 416
    downloads
  • 43
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Benjamin M Adams
  2. Nathan P Canniff
  3. Kevin P Guay
  4. Ida Signe Bohse Larsen
  5. Daniel N Hebert
(2020)
Quantitative glycoproteomics reveals substrate selectivity of the ER protein quality control sensors UGGT1 and UGGT2
eLife 9:e63997.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63997

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63997

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Mitsuhiro Abe, Masataka Yanagawa ... Yasushi Sako
    Research Article

    Anionic lipid molecules, including phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2), are implicated in the regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, the role of the spatiotemporal dynamics of PI(4,5)P2 in the regulation of EGFR activity in living cells is not fully understood, as it is difficult to visualize the local lipid domains around EGFR. Here, we visualized both EGFR and PI(4,5)P2 nanodomains in the plasma membrane of HeLa cells using super-resolution single-molecule microscopy. The EGFR and PI(4,5)P2 nanodomains aggregated before stimulation with epidermal growth factor (EGF) through transient visits of EGFR to the PI(4,5)P2 nanodomains. The degree of coaggregation decreased after EGF stimulation and depended on phospholipase Cγ, the EGFR effector hydrolyzing PI(4,5)P2. Artificial reduction in the PI(4,5)P2 content of the plasma membrane reduced both the dimerization and autophosphorylation of EGFR after stimulation with EGF. Inhibition of PI(4,5)P2 hydrolysis after EGF stimulation decreased phosphorylation of EGFR-Thr654. Thus, EGFR kinase activity and the density of PI(4,5)P2 around EGFR molecules were found to be mutually regulated.

    1. Cell Biology
    Wonjo Jang, Kanishka Senarath ... Nevin A Lambert
    Tools and Resources

    Classical G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling takes place in response to extracellular stimuli and involves receptors and heterotrimeric G proteins located at the plasma membrane. It has recently been established that GPCR signaling can also take place from intracellular membrane compartments, including endosomes that contain internalized receptors and ligands. While the mechanisms of GPCR endocytosis are well understood, it is not clear how well internalized receptors are supplied with G proteins. To address this gap, we use gene editing, confocal microscopy, and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to study the distribution and trafficking of endogenous G proteins. We show here that constitutive endocytosis is sufficient to supply newly internalized endocytic vesicles with 20–30% of the G protein density found at the plasma membrane. We find that G proteins are present on early, late, and recycling endosomes, are abundant on lysosomes, but are virtually undetectable on the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and the medial-trans Golgi apparatus. Receptor activation does not change heterotrimer abundance on endosomes. Our findings provide a subcellular map of endogenous G protein distribution, suggest that G proteins may be partially excluded from nascent endocytic vesicles, and are likely to have implications for GPCR signaling from endosomes and other intracellular compartments.