Quantitative glycoproteomics reveals substrate selectivity of the ER protein quality control sensors UGGT1 and UGGT2

  1. Benjamin M Adams
  2. Nathan P Canniff
  3. Kevin P Guay
  4. Ida Signe Bohse Larsen
  5. Daniel N Hebert  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Massachusetts, United States
  2. University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

UDP-glucose: glycoprotein glucosyltransferase (UGGT) 1 and 2 are central hubs in the chaperone network of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), acting as gatekeepers to the early secretory pathway yet little is known about their cellular clients. These two quality control sensors control lectin chaperone binding and glycoprotein egress from ER. A quantitative glycoproteomics strategy was deployed to identify cellular substrates of the UGGTs at endogenous levels in CRISPR-edited HEK293 cells. The seventy-one UGGT substrates identified were mainly large multidomain and heavily glycosylated proteins when compared to the general N-glycoproteome. UGGT1 was the dominant glucosyltransferase with a preference towards large plasma membrane proteins whereas UGGT2 favored the modification of smaller, soluble lysosomal proteins. This study sheds light on differential specificities and roles of UGGT1 and UGGT2 and provides insight into the cellular reliance on carbohydrate-dependent chaperone system to facilitate proper folding and maturation of the cellular N-glycoproteome.

Data availability

All data generated during this study are included in the manuscript or supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Benjamin M Adams

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nathan P Canniff

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kevin P Guay

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ida Signe Bohse Larsen

    Copenhagen Center for Glycomics, Departments of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Daniel N Hebert

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States
    For correspondence
    dhebert@biochem.umass.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1537-4446

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM086874)

  • Daniel N Hebert

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008515)

  • Benjamin M Adams
  • Nathan P Canniff

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Elizabeth A Miller, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Received: October 13, 2020
  2. Accepted: December 14, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 15, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 29, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Adams et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,097
    views
  • 406
    downloads
  • 34
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Benjamin M Adams
  2. Nathan P Canniff
  3. Kevin P Guay
  4. Ida Signe Bohse Larsen
  5. Daniel N Hebert
(2020)
Quantitative glycoproteomics reveals substrate selectivity of the ER protein quality control sensors UGGT1 and UGGT2
eLife 9:e63997.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63997

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63997

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Trine Line Hauge Okholm, Andreas Bjerregaard Kamstrup ... Christian Kroun Damgaard
    Research Article

    Circular RNAs represent a class of endogenous RNAs that regulate gene expression and influence cell biological decisions with implications for the pathogenesis of several diseases. Here, we disclose a novel gene-regulatory role of circHIPK3 by combining analyses of large genomics datasets and mechanistic cell biological follow-up experiments. Using time-course depletion of circHIPK3 and specific candidate RNA-binding proteins, we identify several perturbed genes by RNA sequencing analyses. Expression-coupled motif analyses identify an 11-mer motif within circHIPK3, which also becomes enriched in genes that are downregulated upon circHIPK3 depletion. By mining eCLIP datasets and combined with RNA immunoprecipitation assays, we demonstrate that the 11-mer motif constitutes a strong binding site for IGF2BP2 in bladder cancer cell lines. Our results suggest that circHIPK3 can sequester IGF2BP2 as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA), leading to target mRNA stabilization. As an example of a circHIPK3-regulated gene, we focus on the STAT3 mRNA as a specific substrate of IGF2BP2 and validate that manipulation of circHIPK3 regulates IGF2BP2-STAT3 mRNA binding and, thereby, STAT3 mRNA levels. Surprisingly, absolute copy number quantifications demonstrate that IGF2BP2 outnumbers circHIPK3 by orders of magnitude, which is inconsistent with a simple 1:1 ceRNA hypothesis. Instead, we show that circHIPK3 can nucleate multiple copies of IGF2BP2, potentially via phase separation, to produce IGF2BP2 condensates. Our results support a model where a few cellular circHIPK3 molecules can induce IGF2BP2 condensation, thereby regulating key factors for cell proliferation.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    N Suhas Jagannathan, Javier Yu Peng Koh ... Lisa Tucker-Kellogg
    Research Article

    Bats have unique characteristics compared to other mammals, including increased longevity and higher resistance to cancer and infectious disease. While previous studies have analyzed the metabolic requirements for flight, it is still unclear how bat metabolism supports these unique features, and no study has integrated metabolomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics to characterize bat metabolism. In this work, we performed a multi-omics data analysis using a computational model of metabolic fluxes to identify fundamental differences in central metabolism between primary lung fibroblast cell lines from the black flying fox fruit bat (Pteropus alecto) and human. Bat cells showed higher expression levels of Complex I components of electron transport chain (ETC), but, remarkably, a lower rate of oxygen consumption. Computational modeling interpreted these results as indicating that Complex II activity may be low or reversed, similar to an ischemic state. An ischemic-like state of bats was also supported by decreased levels of central metabolites and increased ratios of succinate to fumarate in bat cells. Ischemic states tend to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), which would be incompatible with the longevity of bats. However, bat cells had higher antioxidant reservoirs (higher total glutathione and higher ratio of NADPH to NADP) despite higher mitochondrial ROS levels. In addition, bat cells were more resistant to glucose deprivation and had increased resistance to ferroptosis, one of the characteristics of which is oxidative stress. Thus, our studies revealed distinct differences in the ETC regulation and metabolic stress responses between human and bat cells.