Charge-driven condensation of RNA and proteins suggests broad role of phase separation in cytoplasmic environments

Abstract

Phase separation processes are increasingly being recognized as important organizing mechanisms of biological macromolecules in cellular environments. Well established drivers of phase separation are multi-valency and intrinsic disorder. Here, we show that globular macromolecules may condense simply based on electrostatic complementarity. More specifically, phase separation of mixtures between RNA and positively charged proteins is described from a combination of multiscale computer simulations with microscopy and spectroscopy experiments. Phase diagrams were mapped out as a function of molecular concentrations in experiment and as a function of molecular size and temperature via simulations. The resulting condensates were found to retain at least some degree of internal dynamics varying as a function of the molecular composition. The results suggest a more general principle for phase separation that is based primarily on electrostatic complementarity without invoking polymer properties as in most previous studies. Simulation results furthermore suggest that such phase separation may occur widely in heterogenous cellular environment between nucleic acid and protein components.

Data availability

All experimental data generated and analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Bercem Dutagaci

    Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0333-5757
  2. Grzegorz Nawrocki

    Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Joyce Goodluck

    Physics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ali Akbar Ashkarran

    Precision Health Program and Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Charles G Hoogstraten

    Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Lisa J Lapidus

    Physics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    For correspondence
    lapidus@msu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Michael Feig

    Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    For correspondence
    mfeiglab@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9380-6422

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R35 GM126948)

  • Bercem Dutagaci
  • Grzegorz Nawrocki
  • Michael Feig

National Science Foundation (MCB 1817307)

  • Bercem Dutagaci
  • Grzegorz Nawrocki
  • Joyce Goodluck
  • Lisa J Lapidus
  • Michael Feig

National Science Foundation (MCB 2018296)

  • Charles G Hoogstraten

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Donald Hamelberg, Georgia State University, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: October 15, 2020
  2. Accepted: January 25, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 26, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 10, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Dutagaci et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,574
    Page views
  • 668
    Downloads
  • 21
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Bercem Dutagaci
  2. Grzegorz Nawrocki
  3. Joyce Goodluck
  4. Ali Akbar Ashkarran
  5. Charles G Hoogstraten
  6. Lisa J Lapidus
  7. Michael Feig
(2021)
Charge-driven condensation of RNA and proteins suggests broad role of phase separation in cytoplasmic environments
eLife 10:e64004.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64004

Further reading

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Sophie Marbach, Noah Ziethen ... Karen Alim
    Research Article Updated

    Veins in vascular networks, such as in blood vasculature or leaf networks, continuously reorganize, grow or shrink, to minimize energy dissipation. Flow shear stress on vein walls has been set forth as the local driver for a vein’s continuous adaptation. Yet, shear feedback alone cannot account for the observed diversity of vein dynamics – a puzzle made harder by scarce spatiotemporal data. Here, we resolve network-wide vein dynamics and shear rate during spontaneous reorganization in the prototypical vascular networks of Physarum polycephalum. Our experiments reveal a plethora of vein dynamics (stable, growing, shrinking) where the role of shear is ambiguous. Quantitative analysis of our data reveals that (a) shear rate indeed feeds back on vein radius, yet, with a time delay of 1–3 min. Further, we reconcile the experimentally observed disparate vein fates by developing a model for vein adaptation within a network and accounting for the observed time delay. The model reveals that (b) vein fate is determined by parameters – local pressure or relative vein resistance – which integrate the entire network’s architecture, as they result from global conservation of fluid volume. Finally, we observe avalanches of network reorganization events that cause entire clusters of veins to vanish. Such avalanches are consistent with network architecture integrating parameters governing vein fate as vein connections continuously change. As the network architecture integrating parameters intrinsically arise from laminar fluid flow in veins, we expect our findings to play a role across flow-based vascular networks.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Thomas S Shimizu, E Toby Kiers, Howard A Stone
    Insight

    A combination of in toto imaging and theory suggests a new mechanism for the remodeling of veins in vascular networks.