Major genetic discontinuity and novel toxigenic species in Clostridioides difficile taxonomy

  1. Daniel R Knight  Is a corresponding author
  2. Korakrit Imwattana
  3. Brian Kullin
  4. Enzo Guerrero-Araya
  5. Daniel Paredes-Sabja
  6. Xavier Didelot
  7. Kate E Dingle
  8. David W Eyre
  9. César Rodríguez
  10. Thomas V Riley  Is a corresponding author
  1. Murdoch University, Australia
  2. University of Western Australia, Australia
  3. University of Cape Town, South Africa
  4. Universidad Andrés Bello, Chile
  5. Universidad Andrés Bello, United Kingdom
  6. University of Warwick, United Kingdom
  7. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  8. Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains an urgent global One Health threat. The genetic heterogeneity seen across C. difficile underscores its wide ecological versatility and has driven the significant changes in CDI epidemiology seen in the last 20 years. We analysed an international collection of over 12,000 C. difficile genomes spanning the eight currently defined phylogenetic clades. Through whole-genome average nucleotide identity, and pangenomic and Bayesian analyses, we identified major taxonomic incoherence with clear species boundaries for each of the recently described cryptic clades CI-III. The emergence of these three novel genomospecies predates clades C1-5 by millions of years, rewriting the global population structure of C. difficile specifically and taxonomy of the Peptostreptococcaceae in general. These genomospecies all show unique and highly divergent toxin gene architecture, advancing our understanding of the evolution of C. difficile and close relatives. Beyond the taxonomic ramifications, this work may impact the diagnosis of CDI.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and Supplementary Data which is hosted at Figshare http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12471461.Data files on figshare include:[1] Full MLST data for all 12000+ C. difficile genomes (Fig 1).[2] Whole-genome ANI analyses (Table 1, Fig 3, Fig 5).[3] Tree files for phylogenetic analyses (Fig 2, Fig 4).[4] Pangenome data (Fig 6).[5] Pan-GWAS data (Table 2).[6] Comparative genomic analysis of virulence gene architecture (Fig 7).Note: Regarding the question below - Did your work use any previously published datasets (e.g., DNA sequence data, clinical trial data, field data)?We retrieved the entire collection of C. difficile genomes (taxid ID 1496) held at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/]. The raw dataset (as of 1st January 2020) comprised 12,621 genomes. These genomes comprise hundreds, maybe thousands of publications. The individual accession numbers for all genomes analysed in this study are provided in the Supplementary Data at http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12471461.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Daniel R Knight

    Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia
    For correspondence
    daniel.knight@murdoch.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9480-4733
  2. Korakrit Imwattana

    School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2538-9775
  3. Brian Kullin

    Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5460-1977
  4. Enzo Guerrero-Araya

    Microbiota-Host Interactions and Clostridia Research Group, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Daniel Paredes-Sabja

    Microbiota-Host Interactions and Clostridia Research Group, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Xavier Didelot

    University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1885-500X
  7. Kate E Dingle

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. David W Eyre

    Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    David W Eyre, DWE declares lecture fees from Gilead, outside the submitted work..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5095-6367
  9. César Rodríguez

    Facultad de Microbiología & Centro de Investigación en Enfermedades Tropicales (CIET), Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5599-0652
  10. Thomas V Riley

    School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
    For correspondence
    thomas.riley@uwa.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1351-3740

Funding

Raine Medical Research Foundation

  • Daniel R Knight

National Health and Medical Research Council

  • Daniel R Knight

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Vaughn S Cooper, University of Pittsburgh, United States

Version history

  1. Received: October 25, 2020
  2. Accepted: June 8, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 11, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 29, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Knight et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,077
    views
  • 398
    downloads
  • 49
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Daniel R Knight
  2. Korakrit Imwattana
  3. Brian Kullin
  4. Enzo Guerrero-Araya
  5. Daniel Paredes-Sabja
  6. Xavier Didelot
  7. Kate E Dingle
  8. David W Eyre
  9. César Rodríguez
  10. Thomas V Riley
(2021)
Major genetic discontinuity and novel toxigenic species in Clostridioides difficile taxonomy
eLife 10:e64325.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64325

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64325

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Samuel Pattillo Smith, Gregory Darnell ... Lorin Crawford
    Research Article

    LD score regression (LDSC) is a method to estimate narrow-sense heritability from genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics alone, making it a fast and popular approach. In this work, we present interaction-LD score (i-LDSC) regression: an extension of the original LDSC framework that accounts for interactions between genetic variants. By studying a wide range of generative models in simulations, and by re-analyzing 25 well-studied quantitative phenotypes from 349,468 individuals in the UK Biobank and up to 159,095 individuals in BioBank Japan, we show that the inclusion of a cis-interaction score (i.e. interactions between a focal variant and proximal variants) recovers genetic variance that is not captured by LDSC. For each of the 25 traits analyzed in the UK Biobank and BioBank Japan, i-LDSC detects additional variation contributed by genetic interactions. The i-LDSC software and its application to these biobanks represent a step towards resolving further genetic contributions of sources of non-additive genetic effects to complex trait variation.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Yannick Schäfer, Katja Palitzsch ... Jaanus Suurväli
    Research Article Updated

    Copy number variation in large gene families is well characterized for plant resistance genes, but similar studies are rare in animals. The zebrafish (Danio rerio) has hundreds of NLR immune genes, making this species ideal for studying this phenomenon. By sequencing 93 zebrafish from multiple wild and laboratory populations, we identified a total of 1513 NLRs, many more than the previously known 400. Approximately half of those are present in all wild populations, but only 4% were found in 80% or more of the individual fish. Wild fish have up to two times as many NLRs per individual and up to four times as many NLRs per population than laboratory strains. In contrast to the massive variability of gene copies, nucleotide diversity in zebrafish NLR genes is very low: around half of the copies are monomorphic and the remaining ones have very few polymorphisms, likely a signature of purifying selection.