Abstract

Sleep slow waves are studied for their role in brain plasticity, homeostatic regulation and their changes during aging. Here, we address the possibility that two types of slow waves co-exist in humans. Thirty young and 29 older adults underwent a night of polysomnographic recordings. Using the Transition frequency, slow waves with a slow transition (slow switchers) and with a fast transition (fast switchers) were discovered. Slow switchers had a high EEG connectivity along their depolarization transition while fast switchers had a lower connectivity dynamic and dissipated faster during the night. Aging was associated with lower temporal dissipation of sleep pressure in slow and fast switchers and lower EEG connectivity at the microscale of the oscillations, suggesting a decreased flexibility in the connectivity network of older individuals. Our findings show that two different types of slow waves with possible distinct underlying functions, coexist in the slow wave spectrum.

Data availability

All codes and transformed data used for all the analyses and most specifically to produce all of the figures of the paper can be freely accessible using this link : https://github.com/jmlina/Slow_Wave_Switchers. As requested, the full software licensing will be provided during the review process. We will follow the guidelines you have mentioned as soon as people in charge will be back. All the process will be done for the final version.This information and link was also added in a new section at the end of the paper under "Additional data files".Dataset can not be shared as participants did not give consent for data sharing.For the raw data, a request needs to be formulated to the ethic committee of the Hôpital de Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, as raw data of human participants cannot be made public under Québec's law.The data provided will be anonymized and some will be processed. Researchers who request access to the data will need to provide their research protocol and their IRB approval for this protocol. The documents will be studied by the owner of the database (Julie Carrier) who will then also submit to her institution's REB for authorization to share the data. Data requests should be addressed to:Julie Carrier (PI): julie.carrier.1@umontreal.caSonia Frenette (in cc) : sonia.frenette@umontreal.ca

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maude Bouchard

    psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    maude.bouchard.1@umontreal.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jean-Marc Lina

    Mathematics, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Pierre-Olivier Gaudreault

    Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alexandre Lafrenière

    Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jonathan Dubé

    Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Nadia Gosselin

    Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Julie Carrier

    Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    julie.carrier.1@umontreal.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9863-4436

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Vanier scholarship)

  • Maude Bouchard

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (190750)

  • Julie Carrier

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal and performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Participants provided informed consent and received financial compensation for their participation. (CMER-RNQ 08-136 08-002).

Copyright

© 2021, Bouchard et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,756
    views
  • 236
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maude Bouchard
  2. Jean-Marc Lina
  3. Pierre-Olivier Gaudreault
  4. Alexandre Lafrenière
  5. Jonathan Dubé
  6. Nadia Gosselin
  7. Julie Carrier
(2021)
Sleeping at the Switch
eLife 10:e64337.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64337

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64337

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Mohsen Alavash
    Insight

    Combining electrophysiological, anatomical and functional brain maps reveals networks of beta neural activity that align with dopamine uptake.

    1. Neuroscience
    Masahiro Takigawa, Marta Huelin Gorriz ... Daniel Bendor
    Research Article

    During rest and sleep, memory traces replay in the brain. The dialogue between brain regions during replay is thought to stabilize labile memory traces for long-term storage. However, because replay is an internally-driven, spontaneous phenomenon, it does not have a ground truth - an external reference that can validate whether a memory has truly been replayed. Instead, replay detection is based on the similarity between the sequential neural activity comprising the replay event and the corresponding template of neural activity generated during active locomotion. If the statistical likelihood of observing such a match by chance is sufficiently low, the candidate replay event is inferred to be replaying that specific memory. However, without the ability to evaluate whether replay detection methods are successfully detecting true events and correctly rejecting non-events, the evaluation and comparison of different replay methods is challenging. To circumvent this problem, we present a new framework for evaluating replay, tested using hippocampal neural recordings from rats exploring two novel linear tracks. Using this two-track paradigm, our framework selects replay events based on their temporal fidelity (sequence-based detection), and evaluates the detection performance using each event's track discriminability, where sequenceless decoding across both tracks is used to quantify whether the track replaying is also the most likely track being reactivated.