A novel, ataxic mouse model of Ataxia Telangiectasia caused by a clinically relevant nonsense mutation
Abstract
Ataxia Telangiectasia (A-T) and Ataxia with Ocular Apraxia Type 1 (AOA1) are devastating neurological disorders caused by null mutations in the genome stability genes, A-T mutated (ATM) and Aprataxin (APTX), respectively. Our mechanistic understanding and therapeutic repertoire for treating these disorders is severely lacking, in large part due to the failure of prior animal models with similar null mutations to recapitulate the characteristic loss of motor coordination (i.e., ataxia) and associated cerebellar defects. By increasing genotoxic stress through the insertion of null mutations in both the Atm (nonsense) and Aptx (knockout) genes in the same animal, we have generated a novel mouse model that for the first time develops a progressively severe ataxic phenotype associated with atrophy of the cerebellar molecular layer. We find biophysical properties of cerebellar Purkinje neurons are significantly perturbed (e.g., reduced membrane capacitance, lower action potential thresholds, etc.), while properties of synaptic inputs remain largely unchanged. These perturbations significantly alter Purkinje neuron neural activity, including a progressive reduction in spontaneous action potential firing frequency that correlates with both cerebellar atrophy and ataxia over the animal’s first year of life. Double mutant mice also exhibit a high predisposition to developing cancer (thymomas) and immune abnormalities (impaired early thymocyte development and T-cell maturation), symptoms characteristic of A-T. Lastly, by inserting a clinically relevant nonsense-type null mutation in Atm, we demonstrate that Small Molecule Read-Through (SMRT) compounds can restore ATM production, indicating their potential as a future A-T therapeutic.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting source data files.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS108117)
- Paul J Mathews
Sparks (13CAL01)
- Richard A Gatti
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R33NS096044)
- Michelina Iacovino
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS108117-01S1)
- Paul J Mathews
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R03NS103066)
- Paul J Mathews
American Lebanese and Syrian Associated Charities of St. Jude Children's Hospital (N/A)
- Peter McKinnon
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS037956)
- Peter McKinnon
National Cancer Institute (P01CA096832)
- Peter McKinnon
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR001881)
- Paul J Mathews
Manitoba Research Innovation (312864)
- Geoffrey G Hicks
Cancer Care Manitoba Foundation (761023032)
- Geoffrey G Hicks
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols at The Lundquist Institute (31374-03, 31773-02) and UCLA (ARC-2007-082, ARC-2013-068). The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Lundquist Institute (Assurance Number: D16-00213). Every effort was made to minimize pain and suffering by providing support when necessary and choosing ethical endpoints.
Copyright
© 2021, Perez et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,582
- views
-
- 315
- downloads
-
- 13
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Phantom perceptions like tinnitus occur without any identifiable environmental or bodily source. The mechanisms and key drivers behind tinnitus are poorly understood. The dominant framework, suggesting that tinnitus results from neural hyperactivity in the auditory pathway following hearing damage, has been difficult to investigate in humans and has reached explanatory limits. As a result, researchers have tried to explain perceptual and potential neural aberrations in tinnitus within a more parsimonious predictive-coding framework. In two independent magnetoencephalography studies, participants passively listened to sequences of pure tones with varying levels of regularity (i.e. predictability) ranging from random to ordered. Aside from being a replication of the first study, the pre-registered second study, including 80 participants, ensured rigorous matching of hearing status, as well as age, sex, and hearing loss, between individuals with and without tinnitus. Despite some changes in the details of the paradigm, both studies equivalently reveal a group difference in neural representation, based on multivariate pattern analysis, of upcoming stimuli before their onset. These data strongly suggest that individuals with tinnitus engage anticipatory auditory predictions differently to controls. While the observation of different predictive processes is robust and replicable, the precise neurocognitive mechanism underlying it calls for further, ideally longitudinal, studies to establish its role as a potential contributor to, and/or consequence of, tinnitus.
-
- Neuroscience
Learning alters cortical representations and improves perception. Apical tuft dendrites in cortical layer 1, which are unique in their connectivity and biophysical properties, may be a key site of learning-induced plasticity. We used both two-photon and SCAPE microscopy to longitudinally track tuft-wide calcium spikes in apical dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in barrel cortex as mice learned a tactile behavior. Mice were trained to discriminate two orthogonal directions of whisker stimulation. Reinforcement learning, but not repeated stimulus exposure, enhanced tuft selectivity for both directions equally, even though only one was associated with reward. Selective tufts emerged from initially unresponsive or low-selectivity populations. Animal movement and choice did not account for changes in stimulus selectivity. Enhanced selectivity persisted even after rewards were removed and animals ceased performing the task. We conclude that learning produces long-lasting realignment of apical dendrite tuft responses to behaviorally relevant dimensions of a task.