Abstract

Axon navigation depends on the interactions between guidance molecules along the trajectory and specific receptors on the growth cone. However, our in vitro and in vivo studies on the role of Endoglycan demonstrate that in addition to specific guidance cue – receptor interactions, axon guidance depends on fine-tuning of cell-cell adhesion. Endoglycan, a sialomucin, plays a role in axon guidance in the central nervous system of chicken embryos, but it is neither an axon guidance cue nor a receptor. Rather Endoglycan acts as a negative regulator of molecular interactions based on evidence from in vitro experiments demonstrating reduced adhesion of growth cones . In the absence of Endoglycan, commissural axons fail to properly navigate the midline of the spinal cord. Taken together, our in vivo and in vitro results support the hypothesis that Endoglycan acts as a negative regulator of cell-cell adhesion, in commissural axon guidance.

Data availability

All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Thomas Baeriswyl

    Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Alexandre Dumoulin

    Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2420-6877
  3. Martina Schaettin

    Molecular Life Sciences and Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Georgia Tsapara

    Molecular Life Sciences and Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Vera Niederkofler

    Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Denise Helbling

    Molecular Life Sciences and Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Evelyn Avilés

    Molecular Life Sciences and Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jeannine A Frei

    Molecular Life Sciences and Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Nicole H Wilson

    Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Matthias Gesemann

    Molecular Life Sciences and Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Beat Kunz

    Molecular Life Sciences and Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Esther T Stoeckli

    Molecular Life Sciences and Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    esther.stoeckli@mls.uzh.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8485-0648

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

  • Esther T Stoeckli

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Brain Plasticy and Repair)

  • Esther T Stoeckli

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Baeriswyl et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,421
    views
  • 199
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Thomas Baeriswyl
  2. Alexandre Dumoulin
  3. Martina Schaettin
  4. Georgia Tsapara
  5. Vera Niederkofler
  6. Denise Helbling
  7. Evelyn Avilés
  8. Jeannine A Frei
  9. Nicole H Wilson
  10. Matthias Gesemann
  11. Beat Kunz
  12. Esther T Stoeckli
(2021)
Endoglycan plays a role in axon guidance by modulating cell adhesion
eLife 10:e64767.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64767

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64767

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Lenia Amaral, Xiaosha Wang ... Ella Striem-Amit
    Research Article

    Research on brain plasticity, particularly in the context of deafness, consistently emphasizes the reorganization of the auditory cortex. But to what extent do all individuals with deafness show the same level of reorganization? To address this question, we examined the individual differences in functional connectivity (FC) from the deprived auditory cortex. Our findings demonstrate remarkable differentiation between individuals deriving from the absence of shared auditory experiences, resulting in heightened FC variability among deaf individuals, compared to more consistent FC in the hearing group. Notably, connectivity to language regions becomes more diverse across individuals with deafness. This does not stem from delayed language acquisition; it is found in deaf native signers, who are exposed to natural language since birth. However, comparing FC diversity between deaf native signers and deaf delayed signers, who were deprived of language in early development, we show that language experience also impacts individual differences, although to a more moderate extent. Overall, our research points out the intricate interplay between brain plasticity and individual differences, shedding light on the diverse ways reorganization manifests among individuals. It joins findings of increased connectivity diversity in blindness and highlights the importance of considering individual differences in personalized rehabilitation for sensory loss.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Gabriel Loewinger, Erjia Cui ... Francisco Pereira
    Tools and Resources

    Fiber photometry has become a popular technique to measure neural activity in vivo, but common analysis strategies can reduce the detection of effects because they condense within-trial signals into summary measures, and discard trial-level information by averaging across-trials. We propose a novel photometry statistical framework based on functional linear mixed modeling, which enables hypothesis testing of variable effects at every trial time-point, and uses trial-level signals without averaging. This makes it possible to compare the timing and magnitude of signals across conditions while accounting for between-animal differences. Our framework produces a series of plots that illustrate covariate effect estimates and statistical significance at each trial time-point. By exploiting signal autocorrelation, our methodology yields joint 95% confidence intervals that account for inspecting effects across the entire trial and improve the detection of event-related signal changes over common multiple comparisons correction strategies. We reanalyze data from a recent study proposing a theory for the role of mesolimbic dopamine in reward learning, and show the capability of our framework to reveal significant effects obscured by standard analysis approaches. For example, our method identifies two dopamine components with distinct temporal dynamics in response to reward delivery. In simulation experiments, our methodology yields improved statistical power over common analysis approaches. Finally, we provide an open-source package and analysis guide for applying our framework.