1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
Download icon

ATP and large signaling metabolites flux through caspase-activated Pannexin 1 channels

  1. Adishesh K Narahari  Is a corresponding author
  2. Alex J B Kreutzberger
  3. Pablo S Gaete
  4. Yu-Hsin Chiu
  5. Susan A Leonhardt
  6. Christopher B Medina
  7. Xueyao Jin
  8. Patrycja W Oleniacz
  9. Volker Kiessling
  10. Paula Q Barrett
  11. Kodi S Ravichandran
  12. Mark Yeager
  13. Jorge E Contreras
  14. Lukas K Tamm
  15. Douglas Bayliss  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Virginia, United States
  2. New Jersey Medical School, United States
  3. National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan
Research Article
  • Cited 10
  • Views 1,963
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2021;10:e64787 doi: 10.7554/eLife.64787

Abstract

Pannexin 1 (Panx1) is a membrane channel implicated in numerous physiological and pathophysiological processes via its ability to support release of ATP and other cellular metabolites for local intercellular signaling. However, to date, there has been no direct demonstration of large molecule permeation via the Panx1 channel itself, and thus the permselectivity of Panx1 for different molecules remains unknown. To address this, we expressed, purified and reconstituted Panx1 into proteoliposomes and demonstrated that channel activation by caspase cleavage yields a dye-permeable pore that favors flux of anionic, large-molecule permeants (up to ~1 kDa). Large cationic molecules can also permeate the channel, albeit at a much lower rate. We further show that Panx1 channels provide a molecular pathway for flux of ATP and other anionic (glutamate) and cationic signaling metabolites (spermidine). These results verify large molecule permeation directly through activated Panx1 channels that can support their many physiological roles.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files (Source Data files). Source data files have been provided for Figure 1G, Figure 1 Supplement 1C, Figure 1 Supplement 2B-E, Figure 2D, Figure 2 Supplement 1, Figure 2 Supplement 2A-F, Figure 3B-I, Figure 4 B-D, Figure 4 Supplement 2B-C. Source code has been uploaded to Github: https://github.com/VolkerKirchheim/VK_TIRFsinglevesicleStep1. Data is also available on Dryad under doi:10.5061/dryad.s1rn8pk69

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Adishesh K Narahari

    Pharmacology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    For correspondence
    akn4uq@virginia.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8708-9161

  2. Alex J B Kreutzberger

    Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9774-115X

  3. Pablo S Gaete

    Department of Pharmacology, Physiology & Neuroscience, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3373-9138

  4. Yu-Hsin Chiu

    Institute of Biotechnology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4730-8104

  5. Susan A Leonhardt

    Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Christopher B Medina

    Microbiology, Immunology, and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Xueyao Jin

    Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Patrycja W Oleniacz

    Pharmacology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Volker Kiessling

    Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9388-5703

  10. Paula Q Barrett

    Pharmacology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  11. Kodi S Ravichandran

    Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  12. Mark Yeager

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  13. Jorge E Contreras

    Department of Pharmacology, Physiology & Neuroscience, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9203-1602

  14. Lukas K Tamm

    Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1674-4464

  15. Douglas Bayliss

    Pharmacology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    For correspondence
    bayliss@virginia.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5630-2572

Funding

National Institutes of Health (P01 HL120840)

  • Kodi S Ravichandran
  • Mark Yeager
  • Douglas Bayliss

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (108-2320-B-007-007-MY2)

  • Yu-Hsin Chiu

National Institutes of Health (T32 GM007267)

  • Adishesh K Narahari

University of Virginia (Whitfield-Randolph Scholarship)

  • Adishesh K Narahari

National Institutes of Health (R01 HL138241)

  • Paula Q Barrett

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM099490)

  • Jorge E Contreras

National Institutes of Health (R01 HL48908)

  • Mark Yeager

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM138532)

  • Mark Yeager

National Institutes of Health (P01 GM072694)

  • Lukas K Tamm

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM051329)

  • Lukas K Tamm

National Institutes of Health (F30 CA236370)

  • Adishesh K Narahari

National Institutes of Health (T32 GM007055)

  • Adishesh K Narahari
  • Christopher B Medina

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Baron Chanda, Washington University in St. Louis, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: November 11, 2020
  2. Accepted: January 5, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 7, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 13, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Narahari et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,963
    Page views
  • 338
    Downloads
  • 10
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Categories and tags

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Markov state models of proton- and pore-dependent activation in a pentameric ligand-gated ion channel

    Cathrine Bergh et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Ligand-gated ion channels conduct currents in response to chemical stimuli, mediating electrochemical signaling in neurons and other excitable cells. For many channels, the details of gating remain unclear, partly due to limited structural data and simulation timescales. Here, we used enhanced sampling to simulate the pH-gated channel GLIC, and construct Markov state models (MSMs) of gating. Consistent with new functional recordings, we report in oocytes, our analysis revealed differential effects of protonation and mutation on free-energy wells. Clustering of closed- versus open-like states enabled estimation of open probabilities and transition rates, while higher-order clustering affirmed conformational trends in gating. Furthermore, our models uncovered state- and protonation-dependent symmetrization. This demonstrates the applicability of MSMs to map energetic and conformational transitions between ion-channel functional states, and how they reproduce shifts upon activation or mutation, with implications for modeling neuronal function and developing state-selective drugs.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Tracking the movement of discrete gating charges in a voltage-gated potassium channel

    Michael F Priest et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Positively charged amino acids respond to membrane potential changes to drive voltage sensor movement in voltage-gated ion channels, but determining the displacements of voltage sensor gating charges has proven difficult. We optically tracked the movement of the two most extracellular charged residues (R1 and R2) in the Shaker potassium channel voltage sensor using a fluorescent positively charged bimane derivative (qBBr) that is strongly quenched by tryptophan. By individually mutating residues to tryptophan within the putative pathway of gating charges, we observed that the charge motion during activation is a rotation and a tilted translation that differs between R1 and R2. Tryptophan-induced quenching of qBBr also indicates that a crucial residue of the hydrophobic plug is linked to the Cole–Moore shift through its interaction with R1. Finally, we show that this approach extends to additional voltage-sensing membrane proteins using the Ciona intestinalis voltage-sensitive phosphatase (CiVSP).

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    A molecular mechanism for the generation of ligand-dependent differential outputs by the epidermal growth factor receptor

    Yongjian Huang et al.
    Research Article

    The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a receptor tyrosine kinase that couples the binding of extracellular ligands, such as EGF and transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α), to the initiation of intracellular signaling pathways. EGFR binds to EGF and TGF-α with similar affinity, but generates different signals from these ligands. To address the mechanistic basis of this phenomenon, we have carried out cryo-EM analyses of human EGFR bound to EGF and TGF-α. We show that the extracellular module adopts an ensemble of dimeric conformations when bound to either EGF or TGF-α. The two extreme states of this ensemble represent distinct ligand-bound quaternary structures in which the membrane-proximal tips of the extracellular module are either juxtaposed or separated. EGF and TGF-α differ in their ability to maintain the conformation with the membrane-proximal tips of the extracellular module separated, and this conformation is stabilized preferentially by an oncogenic EGFR mutation. Close proximity of the transmembrane helices at the junction with the extracellular module has been associated previously with increased EGFR activity. Our results show how EGFR can couple the binding of different ligands to differential modulation of this proximity, thereby suggesting a molecular mechanism for the generation of ligand-sensitive differential outputs in this receptor family.