Variations of intracellular density during the cell cycle arise from tip-growth regulation in fission yeast

  1. Pascal D Odermatt
  2. Teemu P Miettinen
  3. Joel Lemiere
  4. Joon Ho Kang
  5. Emrah Bostan
  6. Scott R Manalis
  7. Kerwyn Casey Huang
  8. Fred Chang  Is a corresponding author
  1. UCSF, United States
  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  3. Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea
  4. University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
  5. Stanford University, United States

Abstract

Intracellular density impacts the physical nature of the cytoplasm and can globally affect cellular processes, yet density regulation remains poorly understood. Here, using a new quantitative phase imaging method, we determined that dry-mass density in fission yeast is maintained in a narrow distribution and exhibits homeostatic behavior. However, density varied during the cell cycle, decreasing during G2, increasing in mitosis and cytokinesis, and dropping rapidly at cell birth. These density variations were explained by a constant rate of biomass synthesis, coupled to slowdown of volume growth during cell division and rapid expansion post-cytokinesis. Arrest at specific cell-cycle stages exacerbated density changes. Spatially heterogeneous patterns of density suggested links between density regulation, tip growth, and intracellular osmotic pressure. Our results demonstrate that systematic density variations during the cell cycle are predominantly due to modulation of volume expansion, and reveal functional consequences of density gradients and cell-cycle arrests.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Custom Matlab code used for image analysis has been posted online at the Github repository https://bitbucket.org/kchuanglab/quantitative-phase-imaging/src/master/.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pascal D Odermatt

    Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, UCSF, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Teemu P Miettinen

    Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5975-200X
  3. Joel Lemiere

    Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, UCSF, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Joon Ho Kang

    Brain Science Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4165-7538
  5. Emrah Bostan

    Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdamn, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Scott R Manalis

    Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Kerwyn Casey Huang

    Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8043-8138
  8. Fred Chang

    Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, UCSF, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    fred.chang@ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8907-3286

Funding

Swiss National Foundation (P2ELP3_172318)

  • Pascal D Odermatt

Swiss National Foundation (P400PB_180872)

  • Pascal D Odermatt

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH GM056836)

  • Fred Chang

Wellcome Trust (110275/Z/15/Z)

  • Teemu P Miettinen

Chan Zuckerberg Initiative

  • Kerwyn Casey Huang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mohan K Balasubramanian, University of Warwick, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Received: November 14, 2020
  2. Accepted: June 7, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 8, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 23, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Odermatt et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,323
    views
  • 316
    downloads
  • 35
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pascal D Odermatt
  2. Teemu P Miettinen
  3. Joel Lemiere
  4. Joon Ho Kang
  5. Emrah Bostan
  6. Scott R Manalis
  7. Kerwyn Casey Huang
  8. Fred Chang
(2021)
Variations of intracellular density during the cell cycle arise from tip-growth regulation in fission yeast
eLife 10:e64901.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64901

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64901

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article Updated

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven cell motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high-MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Cell Biology
    Yoko Nakai-Futatsugi, Jianshi Jin ... Masayo Takahashi
    Research Article

    Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells show heterogeneous levels of pigmentation when cultured in vitro. To know whether their color in appearance is correlated with the function of the RPE, we analyzed the color intensities of human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived RPE cells (iPSC-RPE) together with the gene expression profile at the single-cell level. For this purpose, we utilized our recent invention, Automated Live imaging and cell Picking System (ALPS), which enabled photographing each cell before RNA-sequencing analysis to profile the gene expression of each cell. While our iPSC-RPE were categorized into four clusters by gene expression, the color intensity of iPSC-RPE did not project any specific gene expression profiles. We reasoned this by less correlation between the actual color and the gene expressions that directly define the level of pigmentation, from which we hypothesized the color of RPE cells may be a temporal condition not strongly indicating the functional characteristics of the RPE.