A structure of substrate-bound Synaptojanin1 provides new insights in its mechanism and the effect of disease mutations

Abstract

Synaptojanin1 (Synj1) is a phosphoinositide phosphatase, important in clathrin uncoating during endocytosis of presynaptic vesicles. It was identified as a potential drug target for Alzheimer's disease, Down syndrome and TBC1D24-associated epilepsy, while also loss-of-function mutations in Synj1 are associated with epilepsy and Parkinson's disease. Despite its involvement in a range of disorders, structural and detailed mechanistic information regarding the enzyme is lacking. Here, we report the crystal structure of the 5-phosphatase domain of Synj1. Moreover, we also present a structure of this domain bound to the substrate diC8-PI(3,4,5)P3, providing the first image of a 5-phosphatase with a trapped substrate in its active site. Together with an analysis of the contribution of the different inositide phosphate groups to catalysis, these structures provide new insights in the Synj1 mechanism. Finally, we analyzed the effect of three clinical missense mutations (Y793C, R800C, Y849C) on catalysis, unveiling the molecular mechanisms underlying Synj1-associated disease.

Data availability

Diffraction data have been deposited in the PDB under the accession code 7A0V and 7A17. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figure 4 and Figure 4 - figure supplements 1-3.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jone Paesmans

    Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3292-4609
  2. Ella Martin

    Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Babette Deckers

    Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Marjolijn Berghmans

    Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8699-6915
  5. Ritika Sethi

    Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Yannick Loeys

    Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Els Pardon

    Center for Structural Biology, VIB-VUB, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2466-0172
  8. Jan Steyaert

    Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3825-874X
  9. Patrik Verstreken

    Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    Patrik Verstreken, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  10. Christian Galicia

    Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
    For correspondence
    Christian.Galicia.Diaz.Santana@vub.be
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Wim Versées

    Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
    For correspondence
    wim.versees@vub.be
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4695-696X

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (1S04918N)

  • Jone Paesmans

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (1S09120N)

  • Ella Martin

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G0D3317N)

  • Patrik Verstreken
  • Wim Versées

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (11D4621N)

  • Babette Deckers

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (SRP50)

  • Wim Versées

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Paesmans et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,786
    views
  • 243
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jone Paesmans
  2. Ella Martin
  3. Babette Deckers
  4. Marjolijn Berghmans
  5. Ritika Sethi
  6. Yannick Loeys
  7. Els Pardon
  8. Jan Steyaert
  9. Patrik Verstreken
  10. Christian Galicia
  11. Wim Versées
(2020)
A structure of substrate-bound Synaptojanin1 provides new insights in its mechanism and the effect of disease mutations
eLife 9:e64922.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64922

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64922

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.