Surprising phenotypic diversity of cancer-associated mutations of Gly 34 in the histone H3 tail

  1. Brandon R Lowe
  2. Rajesh K Yadav
  3. Ryan A Henry
  4. Patrick Schreiner
  5. Atsushi Matsuda
  6. Alfonso G Fernandez
  7. David Finkelstein
  8. Margaret Campbell
  9. Satish Kallappagoudar
  10. Carolyn M Jablonowski
  11. Andrew J Andrews
  12. Yasushi Hiraoka
  13. Janet F Partridge  Is a corresponding author
  1. St Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States
  2. Fox Chase Cancer Center, United States
  3. National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Japan
  4. Osaka University, Japan

Abstract

Sequencing of cancer genomes has identified recurrent somatic mutations in histones, termed oncohistones, which are frequently poorly understood. Previously we showed that fission yeast expressing only the H3.3G34R mutant identified in aggressive pediatric glioma had reduced H3K36 trimethylation and acetylation, increased genomic instability and replicative stress, and defective homology-dependent DNA damage repair (Yadav et al., 2017). Here we show that surprisingly distinct phenotypes result from G34V (also in glioma) and G34W (giant cell tumors of bone) mutations, differentially affecting H3K36 modifications, subtelomeric silencing, genomic stability, sensitivity to irradiation, alkylating agents, hydroxyurea and influencing DNA repair. In cancer, only one of thirty alleles encoding H3 is mutated. Whilst co-expression of wild-type H3 rescues most G34 mutant phenotypes, G34R causes dominant hydroxyurea sensitivity and homologous recombination defects, and dominant subtelomeric silencing. Together, these studies demonstrate the complexity associated with different substitutions at even a single residue in H3 and highlight the utility of genetically tractable systems for their analysis.

Data availability

RNAseq data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE162572.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Brandon R Lowe

    Department of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Rajesh K Yadav

    Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ryan A Henry

    Cancer Biology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Patrick Schreiner

    Center for Applied Bioinformatics, Dept. of Bioinformatics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5391-2642
  5. Atsushi Matsuda

    Advanced ICT Research Institute, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Kobe, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0510-213X
  6. Alfonso G Fernandez

    Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. David Finkelstein

    Computational Biology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Margaret Campbell

    Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Satish Kallappagoudar

    Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Carolyn M Jablonowski

    Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Andrew J Andrews

    Cancer Biology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yasushi Hiraoka

    Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9407-8228
  13. Janet F Partridge

    Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    For correspondence
    janet.partridge@stjude.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1102-6305

Funding

St. Baldrick's Foundation (Research grant with generous support from the Henry Cermak fund for Pediatric Cancer Research.)

  • Janet F Partridge

National Cancer Institute (Cancer Center support grant (NCI CCSG 2 P30 CA21765))

  • Rajesh K Yadav
  • Janet F Partridge

American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities

  • Brandon R Lowe
  • Rajesh K Yadav
  • Patrick Schreiner
  • Alfonso G Fernandez
  • David Finkelstein
  • Margaret Campbell
  • Satish Kallappagoudar
  • Carolyn M Jablonowski
  • Janet F Partridge

National Institutes of Health (NIH GM102503)

  • Andrew J Andrews

Fox Chase Cancer Center (Board of Associates Fellowship)

  • Ryan A Henry

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Kakheni grant JP19H03202 and JP20H05894)

  • Atsushi Matsuda

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Kakheni grants JP18H05533 and JP20H00454)

  • Yasushi Hiraoka

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Lowe et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,836
    views
  • 320
    downloads
  • 27
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Brandon R Lowe
  2. Rajesh K Yadav
  3. Ryan A Henry
  4. Patrick Schreiner
  5. Atsushi Matsuda
  6. Alfonso G Fernandez
  7. David Finkelstein
  8. Margaret Campbell
  9. Satish Kallappagoudar
  10. Carolyn M Jablonowski
  11. Andrew J Andrews
  12. Yasushi Hiraoka
  13. Janet F Partridge
(2021)
Surprising phenotypic diversity of cancer-associated mutations of Gly 34 in the histone H3 tail
eLife 10:e65369.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65369

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65369

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Liza Dahal, Thomas GW Graham ... Xavier Darzacq
    Research Article

    Type II nuclear receptors (T2NRs) require heterodimerization with a common partner, the retinoid X receptor (RXR), to bind cognate DNA recognition sites in chromatin. Based on previous biochemical and overexpression studies, binding of T2NRs to chromatin is proposed to be regulated by competition for a limiting pool of the core RXR subunit. However, this mechanism has not yet been tested for endogenous proteins in live cells. Using single-molecule tracking (SMT) and proximity-assisted photoactivation (PAPA), we monitored interactions between endogenously tagged RXR and retinoic acid receptor (RAR) in live cells. Unexpectedly, we find that higher expression of RAR, but not RXR, increases heterodimerization and chromatin binding in U2OS cells. This surprising finding indicates the limiting factor is not RXR but likely its cadre of obligate dimer binding partners. SMT and PAPA thus provide a direct way to probe which components are functionally limiting within a complex TF interaction network providing new insights into mechanisms of gene regulation in vivo with implications for drug development targeting nuclear receptors.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ananda Kishore Mukherjee, Subhajit Dutta ... Shantanu Chowdhury
    Research Article

    Telomeres are crucial for cancer progression. Immune signalling in the tumour microenvironment has been shown to be very important in cancer prognosis. However, the mechanisms by which telomeres might affect tumour immune response remain poorly understood. Here, we observed that interleukin-1 signalling is telomere-length dependent in cancer cells. Mechanistically, non-telomeric TRF2 (telomeric repeat binding factor 2) binding at the IL-1-receptor type-1 (IL1R1) promoter was found to be affected by telomere length. Enhanced TRF2 binding at the IL1R1 promoter in cells with short telomeres directly recruited the histone-acetyl-transferase (HAT) p300, and consequent H3K27 acetylation activated IL1R1. This altered NF-kappa B signalling and affected downstream cytokines like IL6, IL8, and TNF. Further, IL1R1 expression was telomere-sensitive in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) clinical samples. Infiltration of tumour-associated macrophages (TAM) was also sensitive to the length of tumour cell telomeres and highly correlated with IL1R1 expression. The use of both IL1 Receptor antagonist (IL1RA) and IL1R1 targeting ligands could abrogate M2 macrophage infiltration in TNBC tumour organoids. In summary, using TNBC cancer tissue (>90 patients), tumour-derived organoids, cancer cells, and xenograft tumours with either long or short telomeres, we uncovered a heretofore undeciphered function of telomeres in modulating IL1 signalling and tumour immunity.