Localization, proteomics, and metabolite profiling reveal a putative vesicular transporter for UDP-glucose

  1. Cheng Qian
  2. Zhaofa Wu
  3. Rongbo Sun
  4. Huasheng Yu
  5. Jianzhi Zeng
  6. Yi Rao
  7. Yulong Li  Is a corresponding author
  1. School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, China
  2. Peking University School of Life Sciences, China
  3. Peking University, China
  4. Peiking University, China

Abstract

Vesicular neurotransmitter transporters (VNTs) mediate the selective uptake and enrichment of small molecule neurotransmitters into synaptic vesicles (SVs) and are therefore a major determinant of the synaptic output of specific neurons. To identify novel VNTs expressed on SVs (thus identifying new neurotransmitters and/or neuromodulators), we conducted localization profiling of 361 solute carrier (SLC) transporters tagging with a fluorescent protein in neurons, which revealed 40 possible candidates through comparison with a known SV marker. We parallelly performed proteomics analysis of immunoisolated SVs and identified 7 transporters in overlap. Ultrastructural analysis confirmed one of the transporters, SLC35D3, localized to SVs. Finally, by combining metabolite profiling with a radiolabeled substrate transport assay, we identified UDP-glucose as the principal substrate for SLC35D3. These results provide new insights into the functional role of SLC transporters in neurotransmission and improve our understanding of the molecular diversity of chemical transmitters.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Cheng Qian

    School of Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Zhaofa Wu

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University School of Life Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rongbo Sun

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Huasheng Yu

    Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peiking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jianzhi Zeng

    Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peiking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yi Rao

    Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0405-5426
  7. Yulong Li

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University School of Life Sciences, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    yulongli@pku.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9166-9919

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z181100001318002)

  • Yulong Li

Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences

  • Yulong Li

State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology

  • Yulong Li

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal procedures were performed using protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Peking University. ( LSC LiYL 1 )

Reviewing Editor

  1. Rebecca Seal, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: December 3, 2020
  2. Accepted: July 15, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 16, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 18, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Qian et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,839
    Page views
  • 351
    Downloads
  • 1
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Cheng Qian
  2. Zhaofa Wu
  3. Rongbo Sun
  4. Huasheng Yu
  5. Jianzhi Zeng
  6. Yi Rao
  7. Yulong Li
(2021)
Localization, proteomics, and metabolite profiling reveal a putative vesicular transporter for UDP-glucose
eLife 10:e65417.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65417
  1. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Andrew P Davison, Shailesh Appukuttan
    Insight

    Artificial neural networks could pave the way for efficiently simulating large-scale models of neuronal networks in the nervous system.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jonathan Nicholas, Nathaniel D Daw, Daphna Shohamy
    Research Article

    A key question in decision making is how humans arbitrate between competing learning and memory systems to maximize reward. We address this question by probing the balance between the effects, on choice, of incremental trial-and-error learning versus episodic memories of individual events. Although a rich literature has studied incremental learning in isolation, the role of episodic memory in decision making has only recently drawn focus, and little research disentangles their separate contributions. We hypothesized that the brain arbitrates rationally between these two systems, relying on each in circumstances to which it is most suited, as indicated by uncertainty. We tested this hypothesis by directly contrasting contributions of episodic and incremental influence to decisions, while manipulating the relative uncertainty of incremental learning using a well-established manipulation of reward volatility. Across two large, independent samples of young adults, participants traded these influences off rationally, depending more on episodic information when incremental summaries were more uncertain. These results support the proposal that the brain optimizes the balance between different forms of learning and memory according to their relative uncertainties and elucidate the circumstances under which episodic memory informs decisions.