Abstract

During obesity and high fat-diet (HFD) feeding in mice, sustained low-grade inflammation includes not only increased pro-inflammatory macrophages in the expanding adipose tissue, but also bone marrow (BM) production of invasive Ly6Chigh monocytes. As BM adiposity also accrues with HFD, we explored the relationship between the gains in BM white adipocytes and invasive Ly6Chigh monocytes in vivo and through ex vivo paradigms. We find a temporal and causal link between BM adipocyte whitening and the Ly6Chigh monocyte surge, preceding the adipose tissue macrophage rise during HFD. Phenocopying this, ex vivo treatment of BM cells with conditioned media from BM adipocytes or from bona fide white adipocytes favoured Ly6Chigh monocyte preponderance. Notably, Ly6Chigh skewing was preceded by monocyte metabolic reprogramming towards glycolysis, reduced oxidative potential and increased mitochondrial fission. In sum, short-term HFD changes BM cellularity, resulting in local adipocyte whitening driving a gradual increase and activation of invasive Ly6Chigh monocytes.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Parastoo Boroumand

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. David C Prescott

    Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Tapas Mukherjee

    Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Philip J Bilan

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Michael Wong

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jeff Shen

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ivan Tattoli

    Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathopysiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Yuhuan Zhou

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Angela Li

    Research Institute, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Tharini Sivasubramaniyam

    Research Institute, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Nan Shi

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Lucie Y Zhu

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1048-5377
  13. Zhi Liu

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Clinton Robbins

    Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathophysiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Dana J Philpott

    Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Stephen E Girardin

    Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Amira Klip

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    For correspondence
    amira@sickkids.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7906-0302

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research FDN-143203 (FDN-143203)

  • Amira Klip

Canadian Institutes of Health Research FDN-14333 (FDN-14333)

  • Dana J Philpott

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mouse protocols followed the strictest protocols dictated by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research guidelines and were approved by the animal care committee (Protocol #20011850 to S.E.G. and 483 D.J.P., University of Toronto; and #1000047074 to A.K., The Hospital for Sick Children).

Copyright

© 2022, Boroumand et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,203
    views
  • 483
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Parastoo Boroumand
  2. David C Prescott
  3. Tapas Mukherjee
  4. Philip J Bilan
  5. Michael Wong
  6. Jeff Shen
  7. Ivan Tattoli
  8. Yuhuan Zhou
  9. Angela Li
  10. Tharini Sivasubramaniyam
  11. Nan Shi
  12. Lucie Y Zhu
  13. Zhi Liu
  14. Clinton Robbins
  15. Dana J Philpott
  16. Stephen E Girardin
  17. Amira Klip
(2022)
Bone marrow adipocytes drive the development of tissue invasive Ly6Chigh monocytes during obesity
eLife 11:e65553.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65553

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65553

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Somen K Mistri, Brianna M Hilton ... Jonathan E Boyson
    Research Article

    During thymic development, most γδ T cells acquire innate-like characteristics that are critical for their function in tumor surveillance, infectious disease, and tissue repair. The mechanisms, however, that regulate γδ T cell developmental programming remain unclear. Recently, we demonstrated that the SLAM/SAP signaling pathway regulates the development and function of multiple innate-like γδ T cell subsets. Here, we used a single-cell proteogenomics approach to identify SAP-dependent developmental checkpoints and to define the SAP-dependent γδ TCR repertoire in mice. SAP deficiency resulted in both a significant loss of an immature Gzma+Blk+Etv5+Tox2+ γδT17 precursor population and a significant increase in Cd4+Cd8+Rorc+Ptcra+Rag1+ thymic γδ T cells. SAP-dependent diversion of embryonic day 17 thymic γδ T cell clonotypes into the αβ T cell developmental pathway was associated with a decreased frequency of mature clonotypes in neonatal thymus, and an altered γδ TCR repertoire in the periphery. Finally, we identify TRGV4/TRAV13-4(DV7)-expressing T cells as a novel, SAP-dependent Vγ4 γδT1 subset. Together, the data support a model in which SAP-dependent γδ/αβ T cell lineage commitment regulates γδ T cell developmental programming and shapes the γδ TCR repertoire.

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jasmine Rowell, Ching-In Lau ... Tessa Crompton
    Research Article

    Here, we sequenced rearranged TCRβ and TCRα chain sequences in CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP), CD4+CD8- single positive (SP4) and CD4-CD8+ (SP8) thymocyte populations from the foetus and young adult mouse. We found that life-stage had a greater impact on TCRβ and TCRα gene segment usage than cell-type. Foetal repertoires showed bias towards 3’TRAV and 5’TRAJ rearrangements in all populations, whereas adult repertoires used more 5’TRAV gene segments, suggesting that progressive TCRα rearrangements occur less frequently in foetal DP cells. When we synchronised young adult DP thymocyte differentiation by hydrocortisone treatment the new recovering DP thymocyte population showed more foetal-like 3’TRAV and 5’TRAJ gene segment usage. In foetus we identified less influence of MHC-restriction on α-chain and β-chain combinatorial VxJ usage and CDR1xCDR2 (V region) usage in SP compared to adult, indicating weaker impact of MHC-restriction on the foetal TCR repertoire. The foetal TCRβ repertoire was less diverse, less evenly distributed, with fewer non-template insertions, and all foetal populations contained more clonotypic expansions than adult. The differences between the foetal and adult thymus TCR repertoires are consistent with the foetal thymus producing αβT-cells with properties and functions that are distinct from adult T-cells: their repertoire is less governed by MHC-restriction, with preference for particular gene segment usage, less diverse with more clonotypic expansions, and more closely encoded by genomic sequence.