Abstract

During obesity and high fat-diet (HFD) feeding in mice, sustained low-grade inflammation includes not only increased pro-inflammatory macrophages in the expanding adipose tissue, but also bone marrow (BM) production of invasive Ly6Chigh monocytes. As BM adiposity also accrues with HFD, we explored the relationship between the gains in BM white adipocytes and invasive Ly6Chigh monocytes in vivo and through ex vivo paradigms. We find a temporal and causal link between BM adipocyte whitening and the Ly6Chigh monocyte surge, preceding the adipose tissue macrophage rise during HFD. Phenocopying this, ex vivo treatment of BM cells with conditioned media from BM adipocytes or from bona fide white adipocytes favoured Ly6Chigh monocyte preponderance. Notably, Ly6Chigh skewing was preceded by monocyte metabolic reprogramming towards glycolysis, reduced oxidative potential and increased mitochondrial fission. In sum, short-term HFD changes BM cellularity, resulting in local adipocyte whitening driving a gradual increase and activation of invasive Ly6Chigh monocytes.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Parastoo Boroumand

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. David C Prescott

    Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Tapas Mukherjee

    Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Philip J Bilan

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Michael Wong

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jeff Shen

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ivan Tattoli

    Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathopysiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Yuhuan Zhou

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Angela Li

    Research Institute, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Tharini Sivasubramaniyam

    Research Institute, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Nan Shi

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Lucie Y Zhu

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1048-5377
  13. Zhi Liu

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Clinton Robbins

    Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathophysiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Dana J Philpott

    Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Stephen E Girardin

    Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Amira Klip

    Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    For correspondence
    amira@sickkids.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7906-0302

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research FDN-143203 (FDN-143203)

  • Amira Klip

Canadian Institutes of Health Research FDN-14333 (FDN-14333)

  • Dana J Philpott

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Florent Ginhoux, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mouse protocols followed the strictest protocols dictated by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research guidelines and were approved by the animal care committee (Protocol #20011850 to S.E.G. and 483 D.J.P., University of Toronto; and #1000047074 to A.K., The Hospital for Sick Children).

Version history

  1. Received: December 7, 2020
  2. Preprint posted: December 9, 2020 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: September 6, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: September 20, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: September 26, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Boroumand et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,871
    views
  • 434
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Parastoo Boroumand
  2. David C Prescott
  3. Tapas Mukherjee
  4. Philip J Bilan
  5. Michael Wong
  6. Jeff Shen
  7. Ivan Tattoli
  8. Yuhuan Zhou
  9. Angela Li
  10. Tharini Sivasubramaniyam
  11. Nan Shi
  12. Lucie Y Zhu
  13. Zhi Liu
  14. Clinton Robbins
  15. Dana J Philpott
  16. Stephen E Girardin
  17. Amira Klip
(2022)
Bone marrow adipocytes drive the development of tissue invasive Ly6Chigh monocytes during obesity
eLife 11:e65553.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65553

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65553

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Mark S Lee, Peter J Tuohy ... Michael S Kuhns
    Research Advance

    CD4+ T cell activation is driven by five-module receptor complexes. The T cell receptor (TCR) is the receptor module that binds composite surfaces of peptide antigens embedded within MHCII molecules (pMHCII). It associates with three signaling modules (CD3γε, CD3δε, and CD3ζζ) to form TCR-CD3 complexes. CD4 is the coreceptor module. It reciprocally associates with TCR-CD3-pMHCII assemblies on the outside of a CD4+ T cells and with the Src kinase, LCK, on the inside. Previously, we reported that the CD4 transmembrane GGXXG and cytoplasmic juxtamembrane (C/F)CV+C motifs found in eutherian (placental mammal) CD4 have constituent residues that evolved under purifying selection (Lee et al., 2022). Expressing mutants of these motifs together in T cell hybridomas increased CD4-LCK association but reduced CD3ζ, ZAP70, and PLCγ1 phosphorylation levels, as well as IL-2 production, in response to agonist pMHCII. Because these mutants preferentially localized CD4-LCK pairs to non-raft membrane fractions, one explanation for our results was that they impaired proximal signaling by sequestering LCK away from TCR-CD3. An alternative hypothesis is that the mutations directly impacted signaling because the motifs normally play an LCK-independent role in signaling. The goal of this study was to discriminate between these possibilities. Using T cell hybridomas, our results indicate that: intracellular CD4-LCK interactions are not necessary for pMHCII-specific signal initiation; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs are key determinants of CD4-mediated pMHCII-specific signal amplification; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs exert their functions independently of direct CD4-LCK association. These data provide a mechanistic explanation for why residues within these motifs are under purifying selection in jawed vertebrates. The results are also important to consider for biomimetic engineering of synthetic receptors.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jean-David Larouche, Céline M Laumont ... Claude Perreault
    Research Article

    Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive sequences representing ~45% of the human and mouse genomes and are highly expressed by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). In this study, we investigated the role of TEs on T-cell development in the thymus. We performed multiomic analyses of TEs in human and mouse thymic cells to elucidate their role in T-cell development. We report that TE expression in the human thymus is high and shows extensive age- and cell lineage-related variations. TE expression correlates with multiple transcription factors in all cell types of the human thymus. Two cell types express particularly broad TE repertoires: mTECs and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In mTECs, transcriptomic data suggest that TEs interact with transcription factors essential for mTEC development and function (e.g., PAX1 and REL), and immunopeptidomic data showed that TEs generate MHC-I-associated peptides implicated in thymocyte education. Notably, AIRE, FEZF2, and CHD4 regulate small yet non-redundant sets of TEs in murine mTECs. Human thymic pDCs homogenously express large numbers of TEs that likely form dsRNA, which can activate innate immune receptors, potentially explaining why thymic pDCs constitutively secrete IFN ɑ/β. This study highlights the diversity of interactions between TEs and the adaptive immune system. TEs are genetic parasites, and the two thymic cell types most affected by TEs (mTEcs and pDCs) are essential to establishing central T-cell tolerance. Therefore, we propose that orchestrating TE expression in thymic cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity in vertebrates.