Morphological and genomic shifts in mole-rat 'queens' increase fecundity but reduce skeletal integrity

  1. Rachel A Johnston  Is a corresponding author
  2. Philippe Vullioud
  3. Jack Thorley
  4. Henry Kirveslahti
  5. Leyao Shen
  6. Sayan Mukherjee
  7. Courtney M Karner
  8. Tim Clutton-Brock
  9. Jenny Tung  Is a corresponding author
  1. Duke University, United States
  2. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  3. Duke University School of Medicine, United States
  4. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States

Abstract

In some mammals and many social insects, highly cooperative societies are characterized by reproductive division of labor, in which breeders and nonbreeders become behaviorally and morphologically distinct. While differences in behavior and growth between breeders and nonbreeders have been extensively described, little is known of their molecular underpinnings. Here, we investigate the consequences of breeding for skeletal morphology and gene regulation in highly cooperative Damaraland mole-rats. By experimentally assigning breeding 'queen' status versus nonbreeder status to age-matched littermates, we confirm that queens experience vertebral growth that likely confers advantages to fecundity. However, they also up-regulate bone resorption pathways and show reductions in femoral mass, which predicts increased vulnerability to fracture. Together, our results show that, as in eusocial insects, reproductive division of labor in mole-rats leads to gene regulatory rewiring and extensive morphological plasticity. However, in mole-rats, concentrated reproduction is also accompanied by costs to bone strength.

Data availability

All RNA sequencing data generated during this study are available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (series accession GSE152659). ATAC-Seq data are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (BioProject accession number PRJNA649596). μCT data from this study are available on MorphoSource (http://www.morphosource.org, project 1056). All code used for the study are available at https://github.com/rachelj98/MoleratBones.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rachel A Johnston

    Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, United States
    For correspondence
    racheljohnston7@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8965-1162
  2. Philippe Vullioud

    Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Jack Thorley

    Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Henry Kirveslahti

    Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Leyao Shen

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke Orthopaedic Cellular, Developmental, and Genome Laboratories, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Sayan Mukherjee

    Department of Statistical Science; Department of Computer Science; Department of Mathematics; Department of Bioinformatics & Biostatistics, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Courtney M Karner

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Tim Clutton-Brock

    Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Jenny Tung

    Evolutionary Anthropology, Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
    For correspondence
    jenny.tung@duke.edu
    Competing interests
    Jenny Tung, Jenny Tung is a Reviewing Editor at eLife..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0416-2958

Funding

European Research Council (294494)

  • Tim Clutton-Brock

National Institutes of Health (AR076325)

  • Courtney M Karner

National Institutes of Health (AR071967)

  • Courtney M Karner

European Research Council (742808)

  • Tim Clutton-Brock

Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0051-2017)

  • Sayan Mukherjee
  • Tim Clutton-Brock
  • Jenny Tung

National Science Foundation (IOS-7801004)

  • Jenny Tung

National Institutes of Health (F32HD095616)

  • Rachel A Johnston

Sloan Foundation Early Career Research Fellowship

  • Jenny Tung

Foerster-Bernstein Postdoctoral Fellowship

  • Rachel A Johnston

Natural Environment Research Council (Doctoral Training Program Grant)

  • Jack Thorley

North Carolina Biotechnology Center (2016-IDG-1013)

  • Jenny Tung

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animals were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and sacrificed with decapitation following USGS National Wildlife Health Center guidelines and under approval from the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Pretoria (Permit #EC081-17).

Copyright

© 2021, Johnston et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,755
    views
  • 188
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rachel A Johnston
  2. Philippe Vullioud
  3. Jack Thorley
  4. Henry Kirveslahti
  5. Leyao Shen
  6. Sayan Mukherjee
  7. Courtney M Karner
  8. Tim Clutton-Brock
  9. Jenny Tung
(2021)
Morphological and genomic shifts in mole-rat 'queens' increase fecundity but reduce skeletal integrity
eLife 10:e65760.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65760

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65760

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bethany M Bartlett, Yatendra Kumar ... Wendy A Bickmore
    Research Article Updated

    During oncogene-induced senescence there are striking changes in the organisation of heterochromatin in the nucleus. This is accompanied by activation of a pro-inflammatory gene expression programme – the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) – driven by transcription factors such as NF-κB. The relationship between heterochromatin re-organisation and the SASP has been unclear. Here, we show that TPR, a protein of the nuclear pore complex basket required for heterochromatin re-organisation during senescence, is also required for the very early activation of NF-κB signalling during the stress-response phase of oncogene-induced senescence. This is prior to activation of the SASP and occurs without affecting NF-κB nuclear import. We show that TPR is required for the activation of innate immune signalling at these early stages of senescence and we link this to the formation of heterochromatin-enriched cytoplasmic chromatin fragments thought to bleb off from the nuclear periphery. We show that HMGA1 is also required for cytoplasmic chromatin fragment formation. Together these data suggest that re-organisation of heterochromatin is involved in altered structural integrity of the nuclear periphery during senescence, and that this can lead to activation of cytoplasmic nucleic acid sensing, NF-κB signalling, and activation of the SASP.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Timothy Fuqua, Yiqiao Sun, Andreas Wagner
    Research Article

    Gene regulation is essential for life and controlled by regulatory DNA. Mutations can modify the activity of regulatory DNA, and also create new regulatory DNA, a process called regulatory emergence. Non-regulatory and regulatory DNA contain motifs to which transcription factors may bind. In prokaryotes, gene expression requires a stretch of DNA called a promoter, which contains two motifs called –10 and –35 boxes. However, these motifs may occur in both promoters and non-promoter DNA in multiple copies. They have been implicated in some studies to improve promoter activity, and in others to repress it. Here, we ask whether the presence of such motifs in different genetic sequences influences promoter evolution and emergence. To understand whether and how promoter motifs influence promoter emergence and evolution, we start from 50 ‘promoter islands’, DNA sequences enriched with –10 and –35 boxes. We mutagenize these starting ‘parent’ sequences, and measure gene expression driven by 240,000 of the resulting mutants. We find that the probability that mutations create an active promoter varies more than 200-fold, and is not correlated with the number of promoter motifs. For parent sequences without promoter activity, mutations created over 1500 new –10 and –35 boxes at unique positions in the library, but only ~0.3% of these resulted in de-novo promoter activity. Only ~13% of all –10 and –35 boxes contribute to de-novo promoter activity. For parent sequences with promoter activity, mutations created new –10 and –35 boxes in 11 specific positions that partially overlap with preexisting ones to modulate expression. We also find that –10 and –35 boxes do not repress promoter activity. Overall, our work demonstrates how promoter motifs influence promoter emergence and evolution. It has implications for predicting and understanding regulatory evolution, de novo genes, and phenotypic evolution.