Morphological and genomic shifts in mole-rat 'queens' increase fecundity but reduce skeletal integrity
Abstract
In some mammals and many social insects, highly cooperative societies are characterized by reproductive division of labor, in which breeders and nonbreeders become behaviorally and morphologically distinct. While differences in behavior and growth between breeders and nonbreeders have been extensively described, little is known of their molecular underpinnings. Here, we investigate the consequences of breeding for skeletal morphology and gene regulation in highly cooperative Damaraland mole-rats. By experimentally assigning breeding 'queen' status versus nonbreeder status to age-matched littermates, we confirm that queens experience vertebral growth that likely confers advantages to fecundity. However, they also up-regulate bone resorption pathways and show reductions in femoral mass, which predicts increased vulnerability to fracture. Together, our results show that, as in eusocial insects, reproductive division of labor in mole-rats leads to gene regulatory rewiring and extensive morphological plasticity. However, in mole-rats, concentrated reproduction is also accompanied by costs to bone strength.
Data availability
All RNA sequencing data generated during this study are available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (series accession GSE152659). ATAC-Seq data are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (BioProject accession number PRJNA649596). μCT data from this study are available on MorphoSource (http://www.morphosource.org, project 1056). All code used for the study are available at https://github.com/rachelj98/MoleratBones.
-
Morphological and genomic shifts in mole-rat queens increase fecundity but reduce skeletal integrityNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, series accession, GSE152659.
-
Morphological and genomic shifts in mole-rat queens increase fecundity but reduce skeletal integrityNCBI Sequence Read Archive, BioProject accession number, PRJNA649596.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
European Research Council (294494)
- Tim Clutton-Brock
National Institutes of Health (AR076325)
- Courtney M Karner
National Institutes of Health (AR071967)
- Courtney M Karner
European Research Council (742808)
- Tim Clutton-Brock
Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0051-2017)
- Sayan Mukherjee
- Tim Clutton-Brock
- Jenny Tung
National Science Foundation (IOS-7801004)
- Jenny Tung
National Institutes of Health (F32HD095616)
- Rachel A Johnston
Sloan Foundation Early Career Research Fellowship
- Jenny Tung
Foerster-Bernstein Postdoctoral Fellowship
- Rachel A Johnston
Natural Environment Research Council (Doctoral Training Program Grant)
- Jack Thorley
North Carolina Biotechnology Center (2016-IDG-1013)
- Jenny Tung
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: Animals were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and sacrificed with decapitation following USGS National Wildlife Health Center guidelines and under approval from the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Pretoria (Permit #EC081-17).
Reviewing Editor
- George H Perry, Pennsylvania State University, United States
Publication history
- Received: December 15, 2020
- Accepted: April 11, 2021
- Accepted Manuscript published: April 12, 2021 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: May 7, 2021 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2021, Johnston et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,455
- Page views
-
- 148
- Downloads
-
- 5
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
An evolutionary perspective enhances our understanding of biological mechanisms. Comparison of sex determination and X-chromosome dosage compensation mechanisms between the closely related nematode species C. briggsae (Cbr) and C. elegans (Cel) revealed that the genetic regulatory hierarchy controlling both processes is conserved, but the X-chromosome target specificity and mode of binding for the specialized condensin dosage compensation complex (DCC) controlling X expression have diverged. We identified two motifs within Cbr DCC recruitment sites that are highly enriched on X: 13-bp MEX and 30-bp MEX II. Mutating either MEX or MEX II in an endogenous recruitment site with multiple copies of one or both motifs reduced binding, but only removing all motifs eliminated binding in vivo. Hence, DCC binding to Cbr recruitment sites appears additive. In contrast, DCC binding to Cel recruitment sites is synergistic: mutating even one motif in vivo eliminated binding. Although all X-chromosome motifs share the sequence CAGGG, they have otherwise diverged so that a motif from one species cannot function in the other. Functional divergence was demonstrated in vivo and in vitro. A single nucleotide position in Cbr MEX can determine whether Cel DCC binds. This rapid divergence of DCC target specificity could have been an important factor in establishing reproductive isolation between nematode species and contrasts dramatically with conservation of target specificity for X-chromosome dosage compensation across Drosophila species and for transcription factors controlling developmental processes such as body-plan specification from fruit flies to mice.
-
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
- Plant Biology
A well-established model for how plants start the process of flowering in periods of cold weather may need revisiting.