Rapid mechanical stimulation of inner-ear hair cells by photonic pressure

  1. Sanjeewa Abeytunge
  2. Francesco Gianoli
  3. A James Hudspeth  Is a corresponding author
  4. Andrei Kozlov  Is a corresponding author
  1. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, United States

Abstract

Hair cells, the receptors of the inner ear, detect sounds by transducing mechanical vibrations into electrical signals. From the top surface of each hair cell protrudes a mechanical antenna, the hair bundle, which the cell uses to detect and amplify auditory stimuli, thus sharpening frequency selectivity and providing a broad dynamic range. Current methods for mechanically stimulating hair bundles are too slow to encompass the frequency range of mammalian hearing and are plagued by inconsistencies. To overcome these challenges, we have developed a method to move individual hair bundles with photonic force. This technique uses an optical fiber whose tip is tapered to a diameter of a few micrometers and endowed with a ball lens to minimize divergence of the light beam. Here we describe the fabrication, characterization, and application of this optical system and demonstrate the rapid application of photonic force to vestibular and cochlear hair cells.

Data availability

All source data can be found on Dryad:CitationAbeytunge, Sanjeewa; Gianoli, Francesco; Hudspeth, A. James; Kozlov, Andrei S. (2021), Rapid mechanical stimulation of inner-ear hair cells by photonic pressure, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.76hdr7sww

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sanjeewa Abeytunge

    Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Francesco Gianoli

    Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4876-7978
  3. A James Hudspeth

    Laboratory of Sensory Neuroscience, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    hudspaj@rockefeller.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0295-1323
  4. Andrei Kozlov

    Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    a.kozlov@imperial.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1993-8341

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • A James Hudspeth

Wellcome Trust (108034/Z/15/Z)

  • Andrei Kozlov

Wellcome Trust (214234/Z/18/Z)

  • Andrei Kozlov

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were conducted according to the rules and regulations of the homeinstitution. At The Rockefeller University the procedures were approved by theInstitutional Animal Care and Use Committee. At Imperial College London, theprocedures were carried out in accordance with the U.K. Home Office Animals(Scientific Procedures) Act (1986).

Copyright

© 2021, Abeytunge et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,386
    views
  • 257
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sanjeewa Abeytunge
  2. Francesco Gianoli
  3. A James Hudspeth
  4. Andrei Kozlov
(2021)
Rapid mechanical stimulation of inner-ear hair cells by photonic pressure
eLife 10:e65930.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65930

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65930

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Song Chang, Beilin Zheng ... Liping Yu
    Research Article

    Multisensory object discrimination is essential in everyday life, yet the neural mechanisms underlying this process remain unclear. In this study, we trained rats to perform a two-alternative forced-choice task using both auditory and visual cues. Our findings reveal that multisensory perceptual learning actively engages auditory cortex (AC) neurons in both visual and audiovisual processing. Importantly, many audiovisual neurons in the AC exhibited experience-dependent associations between their visual and auditory preferences, displaying a unique integration model. This model employed selective multisensory enhancement for the auditory-visual pairing guiding the contralateral choice, which correlated with improved multisensory discrimination. Furthermore, AC neurons effectively distinguished whether a preferred auditory stimulus was paired with its associated visual stimulus using this distinct integrative mechanism. Our results highlight the capability of sensory cortices to develop sophisticated integrative strategies, adapting to task demands to enhance multisensory discrimination abilities.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Brian DePasquale, Carlos D Brody, Jonathan W Pillow
    Research Article Updated

    Accumulating evidence to make decisions is a core cognitive function. Previous studies have tended to estimate accumulation using either neural or behavioral data alone. Here, we develop a unified framework for modeling stimulus-driven behavior and multi-neuron activity simultaneously. We applied our method to choices and neural recordings from three rat brain regions—the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the frontal orienting fields (FOF), and the anterior-dorsal striatum (ADS)—while subjects performed a pulse-based accumulation task. Each region was best described by a distinct accumulation model, which all differed from the model that best described the animal’s choices. FOF activity was consistent with an accumulator where early evidence was favored while the ADS reflected near perfect accumulation. Neural responses within an accumulation framework unveiled a distinct association between each brain region and choice. Choices were better predicted from all regions using a comprehensive, accumulation-based framework and different brain regions were found to differentially reflect choice-related accumulation signals: FOF and ADS both reflected choice but ADS showed more instances of decision vacillation. Previous studies relating neural data to behaviorally inferred accumulation dynamics have implicitly assumed that individual brain regions reflect the whole-animal level accumulator. Our results suggest that different brain regions represent accumulated evidence in dramatically different ways and that accumulation at the whole-animal level may be constructed from a variety of neural-level accumulators.