Information flow, cell types and stereotypy in a full olfactory connectome
Abstract
The hemibrain connectome provides large scale connectivity and morphology information for the majority of the central brain of Drosophila melanogaster. Using this data set, we provide a complete description of the Drosophila olfactory system, covering all first, second and lateral horn-associated third-order neurons. We develop a generally applicable strategy to extract information flow and layered organisation from connectome graphs, mapping olfactory input to descending interneurons. This identifies a range of motifs including highly lateralised circuits in the antennal lobe and patterns of convergence downstream of the mushroom body and lateral horn. Leveraging a second data set we provide a first quantitative assessment of inter- versus intra-individual stereotypy. Comparing neurons across two brains (three hemispheres) reveals striking similarity in neuronal morphology across brains. Connectivity correlates with morphology and neurons of the same morphological type show similar connection variability within the same brain as across two brains.
Data availability
The hemibrain connectome including our annotations is hosted via neuPrint at https://neuprint.janelia.orgPublished data (neuronal reconstructions and connectivity) from the FAFB EM data set is hosted by Virtual Fly Brain (VFB) at https://catmaid.virtualflybrain.org. A snapshot of the FAFB data used in this study will be shared with VFB prior to publication.Meta data (e.g. neuron classifications, axon-dendrite splits, glomeruli meshes, etc) are included in the manuscript and supporting files.In addition, we maintain Github repositories with meta data (https://github.com/flyconnectome/hemibrain_olf_data) and code examples (https://github.com/flyconnectome/2020hemibrain_examples).
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Wellcome Trust (Collaborative Award,203261/Z/16/Z)
- Philipp Schlegel
- Tomke Stürner
- Sridhar R Jagannathan
- Nikolas Drummond
- Joseph Hsu
- Laia Serratosa Capdevila
- Alexandre Javier
- Elizabeth C Marin
- Imaan FM Tamimi
- Feng Li
- Gerald M Rubin
- Marta Costa
- Gregory SXE Jefferis
European Research Council (Consolidator grant,649111)
- Laia Serratosa Capdevila
- Alexandre Javier
- Gregory SXE Jefferis
Medical Research Council (Core support,MC-U105188491)
- Alexander Shakeel Bates
- Gregory SXE Jefferis
National Institutes of Health (BRAIN Initiative grant,1RF1MH120679-01)
- Philipp Schlegel
- Tomke Stürner
- Gregory SXE Jefferis
National Institutes of Health (F31 fellowship,DC016196)
- Asa Barth-Maron
Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (PhD Fellowship)
- Alexander Shakeel Bates
Herchel Smith (Studentship)
- Alexander Shakeel Bates
National Institutes of Health (R01DC008174)
- Asa Barth-Maron
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Gerald M Rubin
- Stephen M Plaza
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Leslie C Griffith, Brandeis University, United States
Version history
- Received: December 22, 2020
- Accepted: May 24, 2021
- Accepted Manuscript published: May 25, 2021 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: July 22, 2021 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2021, Schlegel et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 5,694
- views
-
- 737
- downloads
-
- 105
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Computational and Systems Biology
- Neuroscience
The neural circuits responsible for animal behavior remain largely unknown. We summarize new methods and present the circuitry of a large fraction of the brain of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Improved methods include new procedures to prepare, image, align, segment, find synapses in, and proofread such large data sets. We define cell types, refine computational compartments, and provide an exhaustive atlas of cell examples and types, many of them novel. We provide detailed circuits consisting of neurons and their chemical synapses for most of the central brain. We make the data public and simplify access, reducing the effort needed to answer circuit questions, and provide procedures linking the neurons defined by our analysis with genetic reagents. Biologically, we examine distributions of connection strengths, neural motifs on different scales, electrical consequences of compartmentalization, and evidence that maximizing packing density is an important criterion in the evolution of the fly’s brain.
-
- Neuroscience
Humans can read and comprehend text rapidly, implying that readers might process multiple words per fixation. However, the extent to which parafoveal words are previewed and integrated into the evolving sentence context remains disputed. We investigated parafoveal processing during natural reading by recording brain activity and eye movements using MEG and an eye tracker while participants silently read one-line sentences. The sentences contained an unpredictable target word that was either congruent or incongruent with the sentence context. To measure parafoveal processing, we flickered the target words at 60 Hz and measured the resulting brain responses (i.e. Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging, RIFT) during fixations on the pre-target words. Our results revealed a significantly weaker tagging response for target words that were incongruent with the previous context compared to congruent ones, even within 100ms of fixating the word immediately preceding the target. This reduction in the RIFT response was also found to be predictive of individual reading speed. We conclude that semantic information is not only extracted from the parafovea but can also be integrated with the previous context before the word is fixated. This early and extensive parafoveal processing supports the rapid word processing required for natural reading. Our study suggests that theoretical frameworks of natural reading should incorporate the concept of deep parafoveal processing.