Separable pupillary signatures of perception and action during perceptual multistability

  1. Jan Brascamp  Is a corresponding author
  2. Gilles De Hollander
  3. Michael D Wertheimer
  4. Ashley N DePew
  5. Tomas Knapen
  1. Michigan State University, United States
  2. University of Zurich, Switzerland
  3. Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Netherlands

Abstract

The pupil provides a rich, non-invasive measure of the neural bases of perception and cognition, and has been of particular value in uncovering the role of arousal-linked neuromodulation, which alters both cortical processing and pupil size. But pupil size is subject to a multitude of influences, which complicates unique interpretation. We measured pupils of observers experiencing perceptual multistability -- an ever-changing subjective percept in the face of unchanging but inconclusive sensory input. In separate conditions the endogenously generated perceptual changes were either task-relevant or not, allowing a separation between perception-related and task-related pupil signals. Perceptual changes were marked by a complex pupil response that could be decomposed into two components: a dilation tied to task execution and plausibly indicative of an arousal-linked noradrenaline surge, and an overlapping constriction tied to the perceptual transient and plausibly a marker of altered visual cortical representation. Constriction, but not dilation, amplitude systematically depended on the time interval between perceptual changes, possibly providing an overt index of neural adaptation. These results show that the pupil provides a simultaneous reading on interacting but dissociable neural processes during perceptual multistability, and suggest that arousal-linked neuromodulator release shapes action but not perception in these circumstances.

Data availability

The raw data associated with this study are available from datadryad.org (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.41ns1rncp)Analysis code associated with this study is available from GitHub (https://github.com/janbrascamp/Pupils_during_binocular_rivalry)

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jan Brascamp

    Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    For correspondence
    brascamp@msu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7955-5479
  2. Gilles De Hollander

    Zurich Center for Neuroeconomics, Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1988-5091
  3. Michael D Wertheimer

    Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ashley N DePew

    Psychology, Michigan State University, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8398-7319
  5. Tomas Knapen

    University of Amsterdam, Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5863-8689

Funding

No external funding was received for this work.

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent, and consent to publish, was obtained, and all research was approved by Michigan State University IRB, and executed in accordance with the Michigan State University IRB guidelines. The MSU IRB protocol number associated with this work is IRB# 17-996.

Copyright

© 2021, Brascamp et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,310
    views
  • 165
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jan Brascamp
  2. Gilles De Hollander
  3. Michael D Wertheimer
  4. Ashley N DePew
  5. Tomas Knapen
(2021)
Separable pupillary signatures of perception and action during perceptual multistability
eLife 10:e66161.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66161

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66161

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Geoffrey W Meissner, Allison Vannan ... FlyLight Project Team
    Research Article

    Techniques that enable precise manipulations of subsets of neurons in the fly central nervous system (CNS) have greatly facilitated our understanding of the neural basis of behavior. Split-GAL4 driver lines allow specific targeting of cell types in Drosophila melanogaster and other species. We describe here a collection of 3060 lines targeting a range of cell types in the adult Drosophila CNS and 1373 lines characterized in third-instar larvae. These tools enable functional, transcriptomic, and proteomic studies based on precise anatomical targeting. NeuronBridge and other search tools relate light microscopy images of these split-GAL4 lines to connectomes reconstructed from electron microscopy images. The collections are the result of screening over 77,000 split hemidriver combinations. Previously published and new lines are included, all validated for driver expression and curated for optimal cell-type specificity across diverse cell types. In addition to images and fly stocks for these well-characterized lines, we make available 300,000 new 3D images of other split-GAL4 lines.

    1. Neuroscience
    Hyun Jee Lee, Jingting Liang ... Hang Lu
    Research Advance

    Cell identification is an important yet difficult process in data analysis of biological images. Previously, we developed an automated cell identification method called CRF_ID and demonstrated its high performance in Caenorhabditis elegans whole-brain images (Chaudhary et al., 2021). However, because the method was optimized for whole-brain imaging, comparable performance could not be guaranteed for application in commonly used C. elegans multi-cell images that display a subpopulation of cells. Here, we present an advancement, CRF_ID 2.0, that expands the generalizability of the method to multi-cell imaging beyond whole-brain imaging. To illustrate the application of the advance, we show the characterization of CRF_ID 2.0 in multi-cell imaging and cell-specific gene expression analysis in C. elegans. This work demonstrates that high-accuracy automated cell annotation in multi-cell imaging can expedite cell identification and reduce its subjectivity in C. elegans and potentially other biological images of various origins.