FnCas9-based CRISPR diagnostic for rapid and accurate detection of major SARS-CoV-2 variants on a paper strip

  1. Manoj Kumar
  2. Sneha Gulati
  3. Asgar H Ansari
  4. Rhythm Phutela
  5. Sundaram Acharya
  6. Mohd Azhar
  7. Jayaram Murthy
  8. Poorti Kathpalia
  9. Akshay Kanakan
  10. Ranjeet Maurya
  11. Janani Srinivasa Vasudevan
  12. Aparna S
  13. Rajesh Pandey
  14. Souvik Maiti  Is a corresponding author
  15. Debojyoti Chakraborty  Is a corresponding author
  1. CSIR-Institute of Genomics & Integrative Biology, India
  2. Academy of Scientific & Innovative Research (AcSIR), India
  3. CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, India
10 figures and 5 additional files

Figures

Schematic for RAY.

(A) FnCas9 is unable to bind or cleave targets having two mismatches at the PAM proximal 2nd and 6th or PAM distal 16th and 19th positions as shown (left panel). The quantification of cleavage with …

Adaptation of RAY for identification of N501Y mutation.

(A) Schematic showing the application of RAY for distinguishing variants WT and N501Y using electrophoresis, key steps in the process are shown. The uncleaved band represents the amplicon from …

Validation of single amplicon RAY on patient samples.

(A) RAY optimization with different size of S gene PCR amplicons. Optimal amplicon length denoted by red dotted box. (B) Reproducibility in output on multiple runs of RAY on the same samples (WT or …

Double amplicon RAY.

(A) Effect of single/double biotin labeling on primers for the 580 bp amplicon. (B) Effect of reduction of amplicon length on RAY outcomes. Red dotted box shows the optimal amplification conditions …

Appendix 1—figure 1
Cycling conditions for Reverse Transcription-PCR for RAY .
Appendix 1—figure 2
Representative image of RAY outcomes on a paper strip for sample having the N501Y mutation (Mut) or the parent CoV-2 sequence (Wt).

Left panel shows outcome with SN501Y sgRNA and the right panel shows the outcome with SWT sgRNA.

Appendix 1—figure 3
Representative screen-shots showing TOPSE app home page and user interface.
Appendix 1—figure 4
Representative screen-shots showing TOPSE image acquisition for NTC background correction.
Appendix 1—figure 5
Representative screen-shots showing TOPSE data entry step and image acquisition for a sample identified as ‘’Positive’’.
Appendix 1—figure 6
Representative screen-shots showing TOPSE data entry step and image acquisition for a sample identified as “Negative’’.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1

Mutations across emerging SARS-CoV-2 lineages showing the possibility of RAY based targetability of VOCs/VOIs.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/67130/elife-67130-supp1-v2.xlsx
Supplementary file 2

RAY outcomes on patient samples (WT or N501Y).

The cutoff for SWT is 6.7 and SN501Y is 10.2.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/67130/elife-67130-supp2-v2.xlsx
Supplementary file 3

Price estimate of RAY consumables.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/67130/elife-67130-supp3-v2.xlsx
Supplementary file 4

List of oligos used in this study.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/67130/elife-67130-supp4-v2.xlsx
Transparent reporting form
https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/67130/elife-67130-transrepform-v2.pdf

Download links