Climate change is causing shifts in the ecology and biodiversity of different world regions at unprecedented rates. Global warming is also linked with changes in the risk for certain infectious diseases in humans, but also in animals and plants. There are several possible mechanisms for this. For one thing, changing weather patterns may affect how pathogens grow and reproduce. For another, the distribution ranges of animal and plant hosts of certain disease-causing pathogens are changing because of global warming. This means that the distributions of pathogens are also changing, and so is the severity of the diseases that they cause.

Increasing temperatures may also influence the physiological traits that make host species suitable for pathogens. This is because the traits that allow species to survive or adapt to changes in their environment may also make them better at hosting and transmitting the pathogens that cause disease. For example, in plant communities, rising temperatures could favor species with faster growth rates, quicker reproduction and high dispersal, and these traits are often associated with more efficient spread of disease.

Despite a lot of research into the effects of climate, it remains unclear how temperature, pathogen growth and reproduction, and host species’ traits and distributions combine and interact to alter infectious disease risk, especially in wild plant communities. To investigate this, Halliday, Jalo and Laine studied an area in southeast Switzerland where natural temperature and biodiversity change gradually through the region. The aim was to explore how relationships between plant biodiversity, pathogens and disease risk change with temperature, and to understand whether environmental or biological factors influence infectious disease risk more.

Halliday, Jalo and Laine measured the levels of fungal diseases found in the leaves of plant communities spanning 1,100 meters of elevation, showing that higher temperatures increase disease risk both directly and indirectly. Directly, higher temperatures increased pathogen growth and reproduction, and indirectly, they influenced which plants were present and therefore able to act as disease hosts. The results also indicated that temperature can affect how the traits of plants drive the transmission rates of fungal pathogens. Important predictors of disease risk were traits relating to the growth rate of host plants, which tended to increase in areas with low elevation where the surface of the soil was warm.

This study represents the first analysis, in wild plants, of how changing temperatures, the traits of shifting host species, and resident parasite populations interact to impact infectious disease risk. The insights Halliday, Jalo and Laine provided could aid in predicting how global climate change will influence infectious disease risk.

Infectious disease is strongly influenced by host community structure and abiotic conditions (Halliday et al., 2020a; Halliday et al., 2019), both of which are undergoing unprecedented change as the climate is warming (Pachauri et al., 2014) and biodiversity is being reshuffled (Díaz et al., 2019; Hillebrand et al., 2018). Understanding how biotic and abiotic conditions interact to drive the emergence and spread of infectious disease is quickly emerging as one of the greatest research challenges of the 21st century and will be the key to limiting the impacts of infectious diseases on food production systems, wildlife, and humans. Disease ecology provides a framework for achieving this goal through careful examination of interactions among hosts, parasites, and the environment (Johnson et al., 2015a; McNew, 1960; Seabloom et al., 2015; Figure 1a). Yet, we have a poor understanding of how this framework operates under natural conditions, in part because several mechanisms can operate simultaneously, making it difficult to tease apart their relative contributions to realized disease risk.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Climate change involves increased environmental temperatures, which can profoundly alter disease risk (Garrett et al., 2006; Harvell et al., 2002; Rohr et al., 2011). These effects can result from direct impacts of environmental factors on parasite growth, survival and reproduction that underpin disease risk. For example, in an experiment in the Rocky mountains, host plants that grew on heated research plots showed increased disease, largely by increasing the amount of time that environmental conditions were favorable for parasite growth and reproduction (Roy et al., 2004). Importantly however, these same environmental factors can also indirectly influence disease risk by altering the composition of host or vector communities that are required for sustained parasite transmission (Elad and Pertot, 2014; Garrett et al., 2006; Harvell et al., 2002; Mordecai et al., 2019; Newton et al., 2011; Yáñez-López, 2012; Rohr et al., 2011), or by altering host defenses (Descombes et al., 2017; Pellissier et al., 2018; Wolinska and King, 2009). Thus, shifts in parasite replication that are driven by changing host or vector distributions can also determine whether and how changing environmental conditions will alter disease risk. There is growing empirical evidence in support of both direct effects that alter parasite growth and replication, as well as indirect effects that are mediated by changing host or vector community structure. However, disentangling the relative impacts of these direct and indirect effects of environmental factors on disease risk has been historically challenging, because it often requires a priori knowledge of environmental constraints acting on host and parasite populations (Garrett et al., 2006; Harvell et al., 2002; Mordecai et al., 2019; Rohr et al., 2011).

One way to disentangle direct and indirect effects of environmental conditions on disease is to consider these effects in the context of host functional traits. Host functional traits underlie ecologically important resource acquisition and allocation tradeoffs: hosts must balance allocating limited resources to maximize growth and reproduction, while also constructing tissue capable of withstanding stressful environmental conditions (Díaz et al., 2016; Reich, 2014; Reich et al., 2003; Wright et al., 2004). Thus, linking environmental conditions with relevant functional traits has become a tractable way to predict the richness and composition of communities (i.e. community structure) (Cornelissen et al., 2003; Díaz and Cabido, 1997; Funk et al., 2017; Kattge et al., 2020; Lavorel and Garnier, 2002; McMahon et al., 2011; Reich, 2014; Sundqvist et al., 2013).

The functional traits expressed by those species that are able to colonize and persist in a given location can, in turn, affect disease risk (Halliday et al., 2019; Johnson et al., 2013; Kirk et al., 2019). Specifically, an infected host’s ability to transmit disease to uninfected hosts, a trait often referred to as host competence, is often related to fast-growing, poorly defended tissues and short lifespans (Becker and Han, 2021; Cronin et al., 2014; Cronin et al., 2010; Huang et al., 2013; Johnson et al., 2012; Martin et al., 2019; Martin et al., 2016; Parker and Gilbert, 2018; Stewart Merrill and Johnson, 2020; Welsh et al., 2020). Importantly, these functional trait values also underlie ecological tradeoffs related to host growth and defense, resource acquisition and allocation, and survival and reproduction (i.e. life history) (Coley et al., 1985; Herms and Mattson, 1992; Martin et al., 2016; Reich, 2014; Reich et al., 2003; Ricklefs and Wikelski, 2002; Stearns, 1992; Stearns, 1989; Wright et al., 2004). Thus, host community competence (a community-level metric of host competence) is expected to correspond to the same functional traits (i.e. host pace-of-life) that link host community structure to shifting environmental conditions.

A trait-based framework of host community competence may explain why biodiversity loss is consistently associated with higher disease risk (Halliday et al., 2020b; Johnson et al., 2013; LoGiudice et al., 2003; Ostfeld and LoGiudice, 2003), a relationship known as the ‘dilution effect’ of biodiversity (Keesing et al., 2010; Keesing et al., 2006; Ostfeld and Keesing, 2000). This is because host species that are most resistant to biodiversity loss or best able to colonize newly disturbed habitats often rely on the same life-history strategies that are associated with higher host competence (Johnson et al., 2013; LoGiudice et al., 2003; Ostfeld and LoGiudice, 2003). For example, species that are associated with habitat fragmentation, a key anthropogenic driver of biodiversity loss, are often characterized by life history strategies favoring a ‘fast pace-of-life’ (i.e. fast growth rates, quick reproduction, and high dispersal) (Albrecht and Haider, 2013; Fay et al., 2015; Gibbs and van Dyck, 2010; Hanski et al., 2006; Keinath et al., 2017; Merckx et al., 2018; Ziv and Davidowitz, 2019). But this fast pace-of-life often comes at the cost of reduced defense against parasites (Cappelli et al., 2020; Coley et al., 1985; Cronin et al., 2014; Cronin et al., 2010; Heckman et al., 2019; Herms and Mattson, 1992; Johnson et al., 2012; Sears et al., 2015). Thus, habitat fragmentation can increase disease by increasing the density of fast pace-of-life, highly competent hosts, while slow pace-of-life, less-competent hosts are lost (Johnson et al., 2015b; Joseph et al., 2013; Mihaljevic et al., 2014). This hypothesis has widespread empirical support in a variety of systems (Johnson et al., 2019; Johnson et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2018; Ostfeld and LoGiudice, 2003). Shifting community structure during biodiversity loss may therefore predictably influence infectious disease risk (Halliday et al., 2020b).

Although relationships between host community structure and disease risk are becoming increasingly appreciated, how these relationships change across environmental gradients remain unknown (Halliday et al., 2020b; Halliday and Rohr, 2019). The relationship between host traits and host competence can be variable, and this relationship might also depend on the environmental context in which host-parasite interactions play out (Figure 1b., path d). For example, Welsh et al., 2016 showed that when hosts were reared under novel resource conditions, trait-based models of host susceptibility became increasingly inaccurate, because novel resource conditions altered how traits covaried with one another and how raw trait values predicted infection. Thus, traits associated with host community competence in one environment might not predict host community competence across environmental gradients.

We hypothesized that three non-mutually exclusive mechanisms would determine how environmental conditions influence disease risk in host communities: (1) directly, by altering parasite growth and reproduction (i.e. through abiotic constraints; Figure 1b., path a), (2) indirectly, by altering which host species occur in which locations (i.e. mediated by shifting host community structure; Figure 1b., paths b and c), and (3) indirectly, by altering how host traits influence parasite transmission (i.e. moderated by altering the relationship between host traits and host competence, which we refer to as the trait-competence relationship; Figure 1b., path d).

Here, we test the relative contributions of these three mechanisms through which environmental conditions can drive infectious disease risk (i.e. direct, mediated, and moderated) by measuring foliar fungal disease in host plant communities along a roughly 1100 m elevational gradient in Southeastern Switzerland. Foliar fungal parasites are a widely used, tractable model of disease risk that respond to small-scale variation in host community structure and environmental conditions (Cappelli et al., 2020; Halliday et al., 2019, Halliday et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2016; Mitchell et al., 2003; Mitchell et al., 2002; Rottstock et al., 2014). Host community structure and environmental conditions, in turn, vary predictably with elevation (Grinnell, 1914; Halbritter et al., 2018; Malhi et al., 2010; Sundqvist et al., 2013; Whittaker, 1956). Thus, an elevational gradient represents a natural laboratory for studying long-term, large scale changes in climate as well as interacting biotic and abiotic factors that are associated with climate change (Alexander et al., 2015; Fukami and Wardle, 2005; Sundqvist et al., 2013).

Our study reveals strong evidence that increasing temperature associated with lower elevation can directly influence disease risk, which we attribute to well-established effects of abiotic conditions (Avenot et al., 2017; Garrett et al., 2006; Harvell et al., 2002; Tapsoba and Wilson, 1997; Waugh et al., 2003) on parasite replication and growth, and can indirectly influence disease risk by shifting host community structure and by modifying the trait-competence relationship. Together, these results highlight the need to consider biotic and abiotic drivers jointly, in order to predict disease risk in the face of climate change.

To evaluate abiotic constraints on parasite replication and growth (i.e. direct effects), shifting host community structure (i.e. mediation; Baron and Kenny, 1986), and modification of the trait-competence relationship (i.e. moderation; Baron and Kenny, 1986) as mechanisms through which environmental gradients can influence disease risk, we surveyed 220, 0.5 m-diameter vegetation communities (i.e. small plots), that were established in four meadows along a 1101 m elevational gradient as part of the Calanda Biodiversity Observatory (CBO) in 2019 in order to investigate biotic and abiotic drivers of species interactions (Figure 2; Supplementary file 1a).

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Model testing effects of environmental conditions, community structure, and their interaction on disease

We tested whether the relationship between host community structure (i.e. host species richness and host community pace-of-life) and disease would change as a function of environmental conditions by fitting a linear mixed model with square-root transformed community parasite load (e.g. Halliday et al., 2019, Halliday et al., 2017; Mitchell et al., 2002) as the response. Soil-surface temperature, soil moisture, host community species richness, pace-of-life, and pairwise interactions between both measures of community structure and each abiotic variable were treated as fixed effects, with large plots, sites, and meadows as nested random intercepts. All variables that were treated as fixed effects in the model were centered so that the mean value of each variable was used as the reference value for interpreting the other variables' independent effects. This mixed model of disease revealed several independent and interactive effects of host community structure and environmental conditions on disease risk (Marginal R² = 0.227; Conditional R² = 0.497; RMSE = 0.292; LOOCV RMSE = 0.311; Table 1). Consistent with the hypothesis that host pace-of-life can determine host community competence, communities that were dominated by hosts with fast-paced life-history strategies exhibited the most disease, but this effect declined as elevation increased and temperature declined (temperature × pace-of-life: p < 0.001). This weakening effect of host community pace-of-life as soil-surface temperature declined is consistent with the hypothesis that abiotic conditions can alter which traits favor parasite transmission through the relationship between host competence and disease risk (Figure 3). These results therefore provide field evidence that an environmental gradient can alter the effect of host community structure on disease risk.

Figure 3 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Table 1

Predictor	Estimate	Chisq	Df	P
Soil-surface Temperature	0.044	7.4236	1	0.0064
Soil Moisture	–0.254	0.1390	1	0.7092
Host Richness	–0.009	5.3325	1	0.0209
Host Pace-of-Life	0.133	1.6970	1	0.1926
Temperature × Richness	0.004	2.6551	1	0.1032
Temperature × Pace-of-Life	0.118	11.2498	1	0.0008
Moisture × Richness	–0.288	2.7677	1	0.0962
Moisture × Pace-of-Life	–2.037	0.5647	1	0.4524

The model also revealed significant independent effects of host community structure and abiotic conditions on disease risk. Specifically, the model revealed evidence supporting the dilution effect hypothesis: increasing species richness was associated with a reduction in disease (p = 0.021), and this effect was independent of soil-surface temperature (temperature × richness: p = 0.10). Community parasite load was also positively associated with increasing soil-surface temperature (p = 0.006), consistent with the hypothesis that environmental gradients can alter parasite growth and reproduction via abiotic constraints. These effects were qualitatively similar when we included soil temperature, air temperature, or elevation in place of soil-surface temperature in the model (Supplementary file 1c).

In contrast with results involving soil-surface temperature, there was no statistically significant linear relationship between soil moisture and disease (p = 0.71), nor was there a significant interaction between soil moisture and host richness (p = 0.10) or community-weighted mean pace-of-life (p = 0.45) on disease. Because soil moisture was unrelated to elevation, pace-of-life, species richness, and disease in our models, this factor was omitted from further analyses.

Structural equation model comparing direct and indirect effects of environmental conditions on disease

Together, models of host community species richness and pace-of-life showed that declining temperature associated with increasing elevation could determine changes in host community structure, and the model of disease showed that host community structure and temperature could independently and interactively influence disease. To explore the relative influence of these direct and indirect effects on disease risk, we next constructed a structural equation model. Our data were well fit by this model (Fisher’s C = 4.111; p-value = 0.662; 6 degrees of freedom, Supplementary file 1d; Figure 4). The model leverages the strong, negative effect of elevation on soil-surface temperature (standardized path coefficient = –0.91, R² = 0.85) to compare three separate pathways through which increasing temperature can increase disease: First, increasing temperature increased community parasite load directly (standardized path coefficient = 0.24). Second, increasing temperature increased community parasite load indirectly by reducing host species richness (i.e. via mediation; product of standardized path coefficients = 0.045). Third, increasing temperature increased community parasite load indirectly by simultaneously increasing host community pace-of-life (i.e. via mediation; mean-centered standardized path coefficient = 0.39) and strengthening the relationship between host pace-of-life and disease risk (i.e. via moderation; mean-centered standardized path coefficient = 0.18; Figure 4). Together these results highlight the pressing need to consider host community context in predicting how shifting environmental gradients will alter disease risk.

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

This study shows, to our knowledge, the first evidence under natural field conditions that, in addition to directly influencing disease risk, the abiotic environment can also indirectly influence disease both by altering host community structure (i.e. mediation) and by modifying how host community structure influences disease risk (i.e. moderation). Furthermore, this linkage between the abiotic environment and host community structure suggests that any single factor would be inadequate for explaining disease risk along our environmental gradient. Together, these results reveal the role that host communities play in determining ecosystem health across environmental gradients, suggesting that predicting how shifting abiotic conditions will influence disease risk will require explicit consideration of how host and parasite communities jointly respond to the abiotic environment.

Our results indicate that increasing temperatures associated with lower elevation, can independently influence disease. Specifically, increasing temperature increased disease, even after accounting for effects of host community structure on disease. We hypothesize that reduced temperature associated with increasing elevation may have reduced disease directly by constraining parasite growth, survival, and reproduction. Many foliar parasites grow and reproduce more successfully in warmer environmental temperatures (Avenot et al., 2017; Garrett et al., 2006; Harvell et al., 2002; Tapsoba and Wilson, 1997; Waugh et al., 2003). Warmer temperatures can also increase parasite overwintering success (Burdon and Elmqvist, 1996; Pfender and Vollmer, 1999) or allow parasites to produce more generations during a longer growing season (Garrett et al., 2006). These results corroborate past studies suggesting that environmental gradients can directly alter the strength of biotic interactions (Descombes et al., 2017; Hargreaves et al., 2019; Pellissier et al., 2014; Roslin et al., 2017; Schemske et al., 2009), including host-parasite interactions (Abbate and Antonovics, 2014; Allen et al., 2020; LaManna et al., 2017; Nunn et al., 2005). However, despite the strong and consistent effect of increasing temperature on disease, temperature was highly correlated with elevation, and we cannot rule out the possibility that these effects might be driven by some other factor associated with elevation that was not measured, such as changing humidity or soil nutrient availability. Thus, temperature effects should be interpreted with some caution.

In addition to directly influencing disease, our results indicate that increasing temperature can also indirectly influence disease by altering host community structure. Specifically, increasing temperature reduced host species richness, which, in turn, reduced disease. The reduction in host species richness with increasing temperature might be attributable to the occurrence of both low-elevation and high-elevation adapted species occupying the coolest study sites, located at the highest elevation (Colwell and Lees, 2000). Communities in the highest elevation meadow, located just below the tree line, included plant species characteristic of low elevations (e.g. Lathyrus pratensis, Lolium perenne, and Salvia pratensis) and plant species that tend to occupy high elevation grasslands (Soldanella alpina, Ranunculus montanus, and Carex sempervirens), indicating that these high-elevation sites represent an intermediate zone between subalpine and alpine vegetation communities.

Host communities with higher species richness, in turn, experienced less disease (i.e. a dilution effect; Keesing et al., 2010; Keesing et al., 2006), even after accounting for the direct effects of temperature on disease and other measures of host community structure. Past studies indicate that increasing biodiversity is often associated with a decline in disease risk because host community structure shifts during biodiversity loss to favor more competent hosts (Johnson et al., 2019; Joseph et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2018; LoGiudice et al., 2003; Ostfeld and LoGiudice, 2003; Rohr et al., 2020). However, in contrast with past studies focused on biodiversity loss, our study measured biodiversity change across a natural biodiversity gradient, which is not expected to consistently influence disease risk (Halliday et al., 2020b). We hypothesize that increasing species richness may have reduced disease risk in this system by reducing host density (Keesing et al., 2006; i.e. via encounter reduction; Mitchell et al., 2002). Encounter reduction might be particularly relevant in this system, because, in addition to altering host richness, reduced temperatures associated with increasing elevation also influence the length and timing of the growing season, which can affect peak prevalence and the duration of the epidemic season.

In addition to direct and indirect effects via mediation, our results further indicate that increasing temperature can indirectly influence disease by modifying the effect of host community structure on disease (i.e. via moderation). Specifically, disease was influenced by host community pace-of-life, but only at high temperature, low elevation sites. Because more competent hosts often exhibit fast-paced life history strategies (Cronin et al., 2010; Johnson et al., 2012; Martin et al., 2016; Parker and Gilbert, 2018; Welsh et al., 2020), we expected that host communities dominated by species with a fast pace-of-life would experience greater disease. However, a prior study suggested that the relationship between host traits and host competence might be sensitive to environmental conditions (Welsh et al., 2016), which we hypothesized would cause the relationship between host community pace-of-life and disease risk to shift across environmental gradients. Our analysis was consistent with this hypothesis: increasing temperature not only modified host community pace-of-life, but the effect of host community pace-of-life on disease was also sensitive to increasing temperature. Host community pace-of-life most strongly predicted disease risk at the highest temperatures, associated with the lowest elevation, but this effect weakened and ultimately disappeared as elevation increased and temperature declined.

These results indicate that warming temperatures can modify the effect of host community pace-of-life on disease risk, which we attribute to a change in the relationship between host traits and host competence across environmental conditions. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that the interaction between host pace-of-life and temperature could have also been driven by other mechanisms. For example, the values of functional traits expressed by a single species may have changed along the environmental gradient via a phenomenon known as intraspecific trait variation (Albert et al., 2011; Funk et al., 2017; Messier et al., 2010; Violle et al., 2012). Studies of functional traits (including this study) typically characterize each species with a single value for each trait, such as the species-level mean, under the assumption that ecologically important traits vary more among species than within species (McGill et al., 2006). However, functional traits of individuals within a species can vary due to local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity driven by local context (Albert et al., 2011; Funk et al., 2017; Messier et al., 2010; Violle et al., 2012). Thus, intraspecific shifts in the expression of key functional traits across our elevational gradient could drive the apparent interaction between host community pace-of-life and temperature. Alternatively, a reduction in infection severity with cooling temperatures could weaken the importance of investment in disease resistance (Benkman, 2013; Thompson, 1999). Thus, host species may still form strong trade-offs in fast vs slow strategies for growth vs. survival, but this pace-of-life trait would have a weak link with disease severity. Future studies should explore these mechanisms by directly measuring host and parasite functional traits across environmental gradients like elevation.

Together, the results of this study highlight the need to consider host community context in predicting how climate change will alter disease risk. Specifically, in this study, effects of the abiotic environment and changing environmental temperature on disease strongly depended on shifting host community pace-of-life. These results are consistent with a growing body of literature suggesting that the role of host communities in regulating ecosystem processes is at least partially explained by characteristics of species present in those ecosystems (Allan et al., 2015; Heilpern et al., 2020; Le Bagousse-Pinguet et al., 2019; Leitão et al., 2016; Mouillot et al., 2011; Start and Gilbert, 2019; Van de Peer et al., 2018), but that abiotic factors such as temperature can override the effects of biotic factors on ecosystem processes (Cannone et al., 2007; Laiolo et al., 2018). These results therefore suggest that predicting how climate change will influence disease may depend on complex relationships between environmental factors and the structure of host communities.

The data and code supporting the results are available on Figshare (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14058059) and Github (https://github.com/fhalliday/Calanda19/tree/Calanda19_disease_submission; copy archived at https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:rev:86ce01777c396840455fd67a3ff5cd8420e8df21).

1. 1. Halliday FW
   2. Jalo M
   3. Laina A-L

   (2021) figshare

   Calanda Biological Observatory 2019 field data.

   https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14058059

1. 1. Abbate JL
   2. Antonovics J

   (2014) Elevational disease distribution in a natural plant–pathogen system: insights from changes across host populations and climate

   Oikos 123:1126–1136.

   https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01001

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Albert CH
   2. Grassein F
   3. Schurr FM
   4. Vieilledent G
   5. Violle C

   (2011) When and how should intraspecific variability be considered in trait-based plant ecology?

   Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 13:217–225.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2011.04.003

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Albrecht H
   2. Haider S

   (2013) Species diversity and life history traits in calcareous grasslands vary along an urbanization gradient

   Biodiversity and Conservation 22:2243–2267.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0437-0

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Alexander JM
   2. Diez JM
   3. Levine JM

   (2015) Novel competitors shape species’ responses to climate change

   Nature 525:515–518.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14952

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Allan E
   2. Manning P
   3. Alt F
   4. Binkenstein J
   5. Blaser S
   6. Blüthgen N
   7. Böhm S
   8. Grassein F
   9. Hölzel N
   10. Klaus VH
   11. Kleinebecker T
   12. Morris EK
   13. Oelmann Y
   14. Prati D
   15. Renner SC
   16. Rillig MC
   17. Schaefer M
   18. Schloter M
   19. Schmitt B
   20. Schöning I
   21. Schrumpf M
   22. Solly E
   23. Sorkau E
   24. Steckel J
   25. Steffen-Dewenter I
   26. Stempfhuber B
   27. Tschapka M
   28. Weiner CN
   29. Weisser WW
   30. Werner M
   31. Westphal C
   32. Wilcke W
   33. Fischer M

   (2015) Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition

   Ecology Letters 18:834–843.

   https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12469

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Allen WJ
   2. DeVries AE
   3. Bologna NJ
   4. Bickford WA
   5. Kowalski KP
   6. Meyerson LA
   7. Cronin JT

   (2020) Intraspecific and biogeographical variation in foliar fungal communities and pathogen damage of native and invasive Phragmites australis

   Global Ecology and Biogeography 29:1199–1211.

   https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13097

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Avenot HF
   2. King C
   3. Edwards TP
   4. Baudoin A
   5. Hong CX
   6. Avenot HF

   (2017) Effects of inoculum dose, temperature, cultivar, and interrupted leaf wetness period on infection of boxwood by Calonectria pseudonaviculata

   Plant Dis 101:866–873.

   https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-16-0742-RE

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Baron RM
   2. Kenny DA

   (1986) The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations

   Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51:1173–1182.

   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

   • Google Scholar
9. Book

   1. Barry RG

   (2008)

   Mountain Weather and Climate

   Cambridge University Press.

   • Google Scholar
10. Software

    1. Bartoń K

    (2018) MuMIn: Multi-model inference

    R Package.

    https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html
11. 1. Bates TC
    2. Maes H
    3. Neale MC

    (2019) Umx: Twin and path-based structural equation modeling in R

    Twin Research and Human Genetics 22:27–41.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2019.2

    • Google Scholar
12. Book

    1. Bätzing W

    (2015)

    Die Alpen: Geschichte Und Zukunft Einer Europäischen Kulturlandschaft

    CH Beck.

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Becker DJ
    2. Han BA

    (2021) The macroecology and evolution of avian competence for Borrelia burgdorferi

    Global Ecology and Biogeography 30:710–724.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13256

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Benkman CW

    (2013) Biotic interaction strength and the intensity of selection

    Ecology Letters 16:1054–1060.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12138

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Burdon JJ
    2. Elmqvist T

    (1996) Selective sieves in the epidemiology of Melampsora lini

    Plant Pathology 45:933–943.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1996.tb02904.x

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Cannone N
    2. Sgorbati S
    3. Guglielmin M

    (2007) Unexpected impacts of climate change on alpine vegetation

    Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5:360–364.

    https://doi.org/10.1890/060141

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Cappelli SL
    2. Pichon NA
    3. Kempel A
    4. Allan E

    (2020) Sick plants in grassland communities: A growth-defense trade-off is the main driver of fungal pathogen abundance

    Ecology Letters 23:1349–1359.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13537

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Coley PD
    2. Bryant JP
    3. Chapin FS

    (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense

    Science 230:895–899.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.230.4728.895

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Colwell RK
    2. Lees DC

    (2000) The mid-domain effect: Geometric constraints on the geography of species richness

    Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15:70–76.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01767-X

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Cornelissen JHC
    2. Lavorel S
    3. Garnier E
    4. Díaz S
    5. Buchmann N
    6. Gurvich DE
    7. Reich PB
    8. Ter Steege H
    9. Morgan HD
    10. Van Der Heijden MGA
    11. Pausas JG
    12. Poorter H

    (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide

    Aust J Bot 51:335–380.

    https://doi.org/10.1071/BT02124

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Cronin JP
    2. Welsh ME
    3. Dekkers MG
    4. Abercrombie ST
    5. Mitchell CE

    (2010) Host physiological phenotype explains pathogen reservoir potential

    Ecology Letters 13:1221–1232.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01513.x

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Cronin JP
    2. Rúa MA
    3. Mitchell CE

    (2014) Why is living fast dangerous? Disentangling the roles of resistance and tolerance of disease

    The American Naturalist 184:172–187.

    https://doi.org/10.1086/676854

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Descombes P
    2. Marchon J
    3. Pradervand JN
    4. Bilat J
    5. Guisan A
    6. Rasmann S
    7. Pellissier L

    (2017) Community-level plant palatability increases with elevation as insect herbivore abundance declines

    The Journal of Ecology 105:142–151.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12664

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Díaz S
    2. Cabido M

    (1997) Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change

    Journal of Vegetation Science 8:463–474.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/3237198

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Díaz S
    2. Kattge J
    3. Cornelissen JHC
    4. Wright IJ
    5. Lavorel S
    6. Dray S
    7. Reu B
    8. Kleyer M
    9. Wirth C
    10. Prentice C
    11. Garnier E
    12. Bönisch G
    13. Westoby M
    14. Poorter H
    15. Reich PB
    16. Moles AT
    17. Dickie J
    18. Gillison AN
    19. Zanne AE
    20. Chave J
    21. Joseph Wright S
    22. Sheremet Ev SN
    23. Jactel H
    24. Baraloto C
    25. Cerabolini B
    26. Pierce S
    27. Shipley B
    28. Kirkup D
    29. Casanoves F
    30. Joswig JS
    31. Günther A
    32. Falczuk V
    33. Rüger N
    34. Mahecha MD
    35. Gorné LD

    (2016) The global spectrum of plant form and function

    Nature 529:167–171.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16489

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Díaz S
    2. Settele J
    3. Brondízio ES
    4. Ngo HT
    5. Agard J
    6. Arneth A
    7. Balvanera P
    8. Brauman KA
    9. Butchart SHM
    10. Chan KMA
    11. Lucas AG
    12. Ichii K
    13. Liu J
    14. Subramanian SM
    15. Midgley GF
    16. Miloslavich P
    17. Molnár Z
    18. Obura D
    19. Pfaff A
    20. Polasky S
    21. Purvis A
    22. Razzaque J
    23. Reyers B
    24. Chowdhury RR
    25. Shin YJ
    26. Visseren-Hamakers I
    27. Willis KJ
    28. Zayas CN

    (2019) Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change

    Science 366:eaax3100.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100

    • Google Scholar
27. Book

    1. Eggenberg S
    2. Möhl A

    (2013)

    Flora Vegetativa

    Haupt.

    • Google Scholar
28. Book

    1. Eggenberg S
    2. Bornand C
    3. Juillerat P
    4. Jutzi M
    5. Möhl A
    6. Nyffeler R
    7. Santiago H

    (2018)

    Flora Helvetica

    Haupt Verlag.

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Elad Y
    2. Pertot I

    (2014) Climate Change Impacts on Plant Pathogens and Plant Diseases

    J Crop Improv 28:99–139.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2014.865412

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Fay PA
    2. Prober SM
    3. Harpole WS
    4. Knops JMH
    5. Bakker JD
    6. Borer ET
    7. Lind EM
    8. MacDougall AS
    9. Seabloom EW
    10. Wragg PD
    11. Adler PB
    12. Blumenthal DM
    13. Buckley YM
    14. Chu C
    15. Cleland EE
    16. Collins SL
    17. Davies KF
    18. Du G
    19. Feng X
    20. Firn J
    21. Gruner DS
    22. Hagenah N
    23. Hautier Y
    24. Heckman RW
    25. Jin VL
    26. Kirkman KP
    27. Klein J
    28. Ladwig LM
    29. Li Q
    30. McCulley RL
    31. Melbourne BA
    32. Mitchell CE
    33. Moore JL
    34. Morgan JW
    35. Risch AC
    36. Schütz M
    37. Stevens CJ
    38. Wedin DA
    39. Yang LH

    (2015) Grassland productivity limited by multiple nutrients

    Nature Plants 1:15080.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2015.80

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Fukami T
    2. Wardle DA

    (2005) Long-term ecological dynamics: Reciprocal insights from natural and anthropogenic gradients

    Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 272:2105–2115.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3277

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Funk JL
    2. Larson JE
    3. Ames GM
    4. Butterfield BJ
    5. Cavender-Bares J
    6. Firn J
    7. Laughlin DC
    8. Sutton-Grier AE
    9. Williams L
    10. Wright J

    (2017) Revisiting the Holy Grail: Using plant functional traits to understand ecological processes

    Biol Rev 92:1156–1173.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12275

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Garrett KA
    2. Dendy SP
    3. Frank EE
    4. Rouse MN
    5. Travers SE

    (2006) Climate change effects on plant disease: Genomes to ecosystems

    Annual Review of Phytopathology 44:489–509.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143420

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Gibbs M
    2. van Dyck H

    (2010) Butterfly flight activity affects reproductive performance and longevity relative to landscape structure

    Oecologia 163:341–350.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1613-5

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Grinnell J

    (1914) Barriers to Distribution as Regards Birds and Mammals

    The American Naturalist 48:248–254.

    https://doi.org/10.1086/279402

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Halbritter AH
    2. Fior S
    3. Keller I
    4. Billeter R
    5. Edwards PJ
    6. Holderegger R
    7. Karrenberg S
    8. Pluess AR
    9. Widmer A
    10. Alexander JM

    (2018) Trait differentiation and adaptation of plants along elevation gradients

    Journal of Evolutionary Biology 31:784–800.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13262

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Halbritter AH
    2. De Boeck HJ HJ
    3. Eycott AE
    4. Reinsch S
    5. Robinson DA
    6. Vicca S
    7. Berauer B
    8. Christiansen CT
    9. Estiarte M
    10. Grünzweig JM
    11. Gya R
    12. Hansen K
    13. Jentsch A
    14. Lee H
    15. Linder S
    16. Marshall J
    17. Peñuelas J
    18. Kappel Schmidt I
    19. Stuart-Haëntjens E
    20. Wilfahrt P
    21. Vandvik V
    22. Abrantes N
    23. Almagro M
    24. Althuizen IHJ
    25. Barrio IC
    26. Te Beest M
    27. Beier C
    28. Beil I
    29. Carter Berry Z
    30. Birkemoe T
    31. Bjerke JW
    32. Blonder B
    33. Blume-Werry G
    34. Bohrer G
    35. Campos I
    36. Cernusak LA
    37. Chojnicki BH
    38. Cosby BJ
    39. Dickman LT
    40. Djukic I
    41. Filella I
    42. Fuchslueger L
    43. Gargallo-Garriga A
    44. Gillespie MAK
    45. Goldsmith GR
    46. Gough C
    47. Halliday FW
    48. Hegland SJ
    49. Hoch G
    50. Holub P
    51. Jaroszynska F
    52. Johnson DM
    53. Jones SB
    54. Kardol P
    55. Keizer JJ
    56. Klem K
    57. Konestabo HS
    58. Kreyling J
    59. Kröel-Dulay G
    60. Landhäusser SM
    61. Larsen LS
    62. Leblans N
    63. Lebron I
    64. Lehmann MM
    65. Lembrechts JJ
    66. Lenz A
    67. Linstädter A
    68. Llusià J
    69. Macias-Fauria M
    70. Malyshev AV
    71. Mänd P
    72. Marshall M
    73. Matheny AM
    74. McDowell N
    75. Meier IC
    76. Meinzer FC
    77. Michaletz ST
    78. Miller ML
    79. Muffler L
    80. Oravec M
    81. Ostonen I
    82. Porcar-Castell A
    83. Preece C
    84. Prentice IC
    85. Radujković D
    86. Ravolainen V
    87. Ribbons R
    88. Ruppert JC
    89. Sack L
    90. Sardans J
    91. Schindlbacher A
    92. Scoffoni C
    93. Sigurdsson BD
    94. Smart S
    95. Smith SW
    96. Soper F
    97. Speed JDM
    98. Sverdrup-Thygeson A
    99. Sydenham MAK
    100. Taghizadeh Toosi A
    101. Telford RJ
    102. Tielbörger K
    103. Töpper JP
    104. Urban O
    105. van der Ploeg M
    106. Van Langenhove L
    107. Večeřová K
    108. Ven A
    109. Verbruggen E
    110. Vik U
    111. Weigel R
    112. Wohlgemuth T
    113. Wood LK
    114. Zinnert J
    115. Zurba K

    (2020) The handbook for standardized field and laboratory measurements in terrestrial climate change experiments and observational studies

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11:22–37.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13331

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Halliday FW
    2. Heckman RW
    3. Wilfahrt PA
    4. Mitchell CE

    (2017) A multivariate test of disease risk reveals conditions leading to disease amplification

    Proceedings. Biological Sciences 284:20171340.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1340

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Halliday FW
    2. Heckman RW
    3. Wilfahrt PA
    4. Mitchell CE

    (2019) Past is prologue: Host community assembly and the risk of infectious disease over time

    Ecology Letters 22:138–148.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13176

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Halliday FW
    2. Rohr JR

    (2019) Measuring the shape of the biodiversity-disease relationship across systems reveals new findings and key gaps

    Nature Communications 10:5032.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13049-w

    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Halliday FW
    2. Heckman RW
    3. Wilfahrt PA
    4. Mitchell CE

    (2020a) Eutrophication, biodiversity loss, and species invasions modify the relationship between host and parasite richness during host community assembly

    Global Change Biology 26:4854–4867.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15165

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Halliday FW
    2. Rohr JR
    3. Laine AL

    (2020b) Biodiversity loss underlies the dilution effect of biodiversity

    Ecology Letters 23:1611–1622.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13590

    • Google Scholar
43. Software

    1. Halliday F

    (2021) Calanda19, version swh:1:rev:86ce01777c396840455fd67a3ff5cd8420e8df21

    Software Heritage.

    https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:74626cd9574d33070bcb74409b88d9b639e3693c;origin=https://github.com/fhalliday/Calanda19;visit=swh:1:snp:243b4089085811f258a5f354f50a9bfa8de73614;anchor=swh:1:rev:86ce01777c396840455fd67a3ff5cd8420e8df21
44. 1. Hanski I
    2. Saastamoinen M
    3. Ovaskainen O

    (2006) Dispersal-related life-history trade-offs in a butterfly metapopulation

    The Journal of Animal Ecology 75:91–100.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.01024.x

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Hargreaves AL
    2. Suárez E
    3. Mehltreter K
    4. Myers-Smith I
    5. Vanderplank SE
    6. Slinn HL
    7. Vargas-Rodriguez YL
    8. Haeussler S
    9. David S
    10. Muñoz J
    11. Almazán-Núñez RC
    12. Loughnan D
    13. Benning JW
    14. Moeller DA
    15. Brodie JF
    16. Thomas HJD
    17. Morales PA

    (2019) Seed predation increases from the Arctic to the Equator and from high to low elevations

    Science Advances 5:eaau4403.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4403

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Harvell CD
    2. Mitchell CE
    3. Ward JR
    4. Altizer S
    5. Dobson AP
    6. Ostfeld RS
    7. Samuel MD

    (2002) Climate warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biota

    Science 296:2158–2162.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063699

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Hayes AF

    (2015) An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation

    Multivariate Behavioral Research 50:1–22.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683

    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Heckman RW
    2. Halliday FW
    3. Mitchell CE

    (2019) A growth–defense trade-off is general across native and exotic grasses

    Oecologia 191:609–620.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04507-9

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Heilpern SA
    2. Anujan K
    3. Osuri A
    4. Naeem S

    (2020) Positive correlations in species functional contributions drive the response of multifunctionality to biodiversity loss

    Proceedings. Biological Sciences 287:20192501.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2501

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Herms DA
    2. Mattson WJ

    (1992) The dilemma of plants: To grow or defend

    The Quarterly Review of Biology 67:283–335.

    https://doi.org/10.1086/417659

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Hillebrand H
    2. Blasius B
    3. Borer ET
    4. Chase JM
    5. Downing JA
    6. Eriksson BK
    7. Filstrup CT
    8. Harpole WS
    9. Hodapp D
    10. Larsen S
    11. Lewandowska AM
    12. Seabloom EW
    13. Van de Waal DB
    14. Ryabov AB

    (2018) Biodiversity change is uncoupled from species richness trends: Consequences for conservation and monitoring

    The Journal of Applied Ecology 55:169–184.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12959

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Huang ZYX
    2. de Boer WF
    3. van Langevelde F
    4. Olson V
    5. Blackburn TM
    6. Prins HHT

    (2013) Species’ life-history traits explain interspecific variation in reservoir competence: a possible mechanism underlying the dilution effect

    PLOS ONE 8:e54341.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054341

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Hulshof CM
    2. Violle C
    3. Spasojevic MJ
    4. Mcgill B
    5. Damschen E
    6. Harrison S
    7. Enquist BJ

    (2013) Intra-specific and inter-specific variation in specific leaf area reveal the importance of abiotic and biotic drivers of species diversity across elevation and latitude

    Journal of Vegetation Science 24:921–931.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12041

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Johnson PTJ
    2. Rohr JR
    3. Hoverman JT
    4. Kellermanns E
    5. Bowerman J
    6. Lunde KB

    (2012) Living fast and dying of infection: host life history drives interspecific variation in infection and disease risk

    Ecology Letters 15:235–242.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01730.x

    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Johnson PTJ
    2. Preston DL
    3. Hoverman JT
    4. Richgels KLD

    (2013) Biodiversity decreases disease through predictable changes in host community competence

    Nature 494:230–233.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11883

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Johnson PTJ
    2. de Roode JC
    3. Fenton A

    (2015a) Why infectious disease research needs community ecology

    Science 349:1259504.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259504

    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Johnson PTJ
    2. Ostfeld RS
    3. Keesing F

    (2015b) Frontiers in research on biodiversity and disease

    Ecology Letters 18:1119–1133.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12479

    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Johnson PTJ
    2. Calhoun DM
    3. Riepe T
    4. McDevitt-Galles T
    5. Koprivnikar J

    (2019) Community disassembly and disease: realistic—but not randomized—biodiversity losses enhance parasite transmission

    Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 286:20190260.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0260

    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Joseph MB
    2. Mihaljevic JR
    3. Orlofske SA
    4. Paull SH

    (2013) Does life history mediate changing disease risk when communities disassemble?

    Ecology Letters 16:1405–1412.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12180

    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Kattge J
    2. Bönisch G
    3. Díaz S
    4. Lavorel S
    5. Prentice IC
    6. Leadley P
    7. Tautenhahn S
    8. Werner GDA
    9. Aakala T
    10. Abedi M
    11. Acosta ATR
    12. Adamidis GC
    13. Adamson K
    14. Aiba M
    15. Albert CH
    16. Alcántara JM
    17. Alcázar C C
    18. Aleixo I
    19. Ali H
    20. Amiaud B
    21. Ammer C
    22. Amoroso MM
    23. Anand M
    24. Anderson C
    25. Anten N
    26. Antos J
    27. Apgaua DMG
    28. Ashman T-L
    29. Asmara DH
    30. Asner GP
    31. Aspinwall M
    32. Atkin O
    33. Aubin I
    34. Baastrup-Spohr L
    35. Bahalkeh K
    36. Bahn M
    37. Baker T
    38. Baker WJ
    39. Bakker JP
    40. Baldocchi D
    41. Baltzer J
    42. Banerjee A
    43. Baranger A
    44. Barlow J
    45. Barneche DR
    46. Baruch Z
    47. Bastianelli D
    48. Battles J
    49. Bauerle W
    50. Bauters M
    51. Bazzato E
    52. Beckmann M
    53. Beeckman H
    54. Beierkuhnlein C
    55. Bekker R
    56. Belfry G
    57. Belluau M
    58. Beloiu M
    59. Benavides R
    60. Benomar L
    61. Berdugo-Lattke ML
    62. Berenguer E
    63. Bergamin R
    64. Bergmann J
    65. Bergmann Carlucci M
    66. Berner L
    67. Bernhardt-Römermann M
    68. Bigler C
    69. Bjorkman AD
    70. Blackman C
    71. Blanco C
    72. Blonder B
    73. Blumenthal D
    74. Bocanegra-González KT
    75. Boeckx P
    76. Bohlman S
    77. Böhning-Gaese K
    78. Boisvert-Marsh L
    79. Bond W
    80. Bond-Lamberty B
    81. Boom A
    82. Boonman CCF
    83. Bordin K
    84. Boughton EH
    85. Boukili V
    86. Bowman DMJS
    87. Bravo S
    88. Brendel MR
    89. Broadley MR
    90. Brown KA
    91. Bruelheide H
    92. Brumnich F
    93. Bruun HH
    94. Bruy D
    95. Buchanan SW
    96. Bucher SF
    97. Buchmann N
    98. Buitenwerf R
    99. Bunker DE
    100. Bürger J
    101. Burrascano S
    102. Burslem DFRP
    103. Butterfield BJ
    104. Byun C
    105. Marques M
    106. Scalon MC
    107. Caccianiga M
    108. Cadotte M
    109. Cailleret M
    110. Camac J
    111. Camarero JJ
    112. Campany C
    113. Campetella G
    114. Campos JA
    115. Cano-Arboleda L
    116. Canullo R
    117. Carbognani M
    118. Carvalho F
    119. Casanoves F
    120. Castagneyrol B
    121. Catford JA
    122. Cavender-Bares J
    123. Cerabolini BEL
    124. Cervellini M
    125. Chacón-Madrigal E
    126. Chapin K
    127. Chapin FS
    128. Chelli S
    129. Chen S-C
    130. Chen A
    131. Cherubini P
    132. Chianucci F
    133. Choat B
    134. Chung K-S
    135. Chytrý M
    136. Ciccarelli D
    137. Coll L
    138. Collins CG
    139. Conti L
    140. Coomes D
    141. Cornelissen JHC
    142. Cornwell WK
    143. Corona P
    144. Coyea M
    145. Craine J
    146. Craven D
    147. Cromsigt JPGM
    148. Csecserits A
    149. Cufar K
    150. Cuntz M
    151. da Silva AC
    152. Dahlin KM
    153. Dainese M
    154. Dalke I
    155. Dalle Fratte M
    156. Dang-Le AT
    157. Danihelka J
    158. Dannoura M
    159. Dawson S
    160. de Beer AJ
    161. De Frutos A
    162. De Long JR
    163. Dechant B
    164. Delagrange S
    165. Delpierre N
    166. Derroire G
    167. Dias AS
    168. Diaz-Toribio MH
    169. Dimitrakopoulos PG
    170. Dobrowolski M
    171. Doktor D
    172. Dřevojan P
    173. Dong N
    174. Dransfield J
    175. Dressler S
    176. Duarte L
    177. Ducouret E
    178. Dullinger S
    179. Durka W
    180. Duursma R
    181. Dymova O
    182. E-Vojtkó A
    183. Eckstein RL
    184. Ejtehadi H
    185. Elser J
    186. Emilio T
    187. Engemann K
    188. Erfanian MB
    189. Erfmeier A
    190. Esquivel-Muelbert A
    191. Esser G
    192. Estiarte M
    193. Domingues TF
    194. Fagan WF
    195. Fagúndez J
    196. Falster DS
    197. Fan Y
    198. Fang J
    199. Farris E
    200. Fazlioglu F
    201. Feng Y
    202. Fernandez-Mendez F
    203. Ferrara C
    204. Ferreira J
    205. Fidelis A
    206. Finegan B
    207. Firn J
    208. Flowers TJ
    209. Flynn DFB
    210. Fontana V
    211. Forey E
    212. Forgiarini C
    213. François L
    214. Frangipani M
    215. Frank D
    216. Frenette-Dussault C
    217. Freschet GT
    218. Fry EL
    219. Fyllas NM
    220. Mazzochini GG
    221. Gachet S
    222. Gallagher R
    223. Ganade G
    224. Ganga F
    225. García-Palacios P
    226. Gargaglione V
    227. Garnier E
    228. Garrido JL
    229. de Gasper AL
    230. Gea-Izquierdo G
    231. Gibson D
    232. Gillison AN
    233. Giroldo A
    234. Glasenhardt M-C
    235. Gleason S
    236. Gliesch M
    237. Goldberg E
    238. Göldel B
    239. Gonzalez-Akre E
    240. Gonzalez-Andujar JL
    241. González-Melo A
    242. González-Robles A
    243. Graae BJ
    244. Granda E
    245. Graves S
    246. Green WA
    247. Gregor T
    248. Gross N
    249. Guerin GR
    250. Günther A
    251. Gutiérrez AG
    252. Haddock L
    253. Haines A
    254. Hall J
    255. Hambuckers A
    256. Han W
    257. Harrison SP
    258. Hattingh W
    259. Hawes JE
    260. He T
    261. He P
    262. Heberling JM
    263. Helm A
    264. Hempel S
    265. Hentschel J
    266. Hérault B
    267. Hereş A-M
    268. Herz K
    269. Heuertz M
    270. Hickler T
    271. Hietz P
    272. Higuchi P
    273. Hipp AL
    274. Hirons A
    275. Hock M
    276. Hogan JA
    277. Holl K
    278. Honnay O
    279. Hornstein D
    280. Hou E
    281. Hough-Snee N
    282. Hovstad KA
    283. Ichie T
    284. Igić B
    285. Illa E
    286. Isaac M
    287. Ishihara M
    288. Ivanov L
    289. Ivanova L
    290. Iversen CM
    291. Izquierdo J
    292. Jackson RB
    293. Jackson B
    294. Jactel H
    295. Jagodzinski AM
    296. Jandt U
    297. Jansen S
    298. Jenkins T
    299. Jentsch A
    300. Jespersen JRP
    301. Jiang G-F
    302. Johansen JL
    303. Johnson D
    304. Jokela EJ
    305. Joly CA
    306. Jordan GJ
    307. Joseph GS
    308. Junaedi D
    309. Junker RR
    310. Justes E
    311. Kabzems R
    312. Kane J
    313. Kaplan Z
    314. Kattenborn T
    315. Kavelenova L
    316. Kearsley E
    317. Kempel A
    318. Kenzo T
    319. Kerkhoff A
    320. Khalil MI
    321. Kinlock NL
    322. Kissling WD
    323. Kitajima K
    324. Kitzberger T
    325. Kjøller R
    326. Klein T
    327. Kleyer M
    328. Klimešová J
    329. Klipel J
    330. Kloeppel B
    331. Klotz S
    332. Knops JMH
    333. Kohyama T
    334. Koike F
    335. Kollmann J
    336. Komac B
    337. Komatsu K
    338. König C
    339. Kraft NJB
    340. Kramer K
    341. Kreft H
    342. Kühn I
    343. Kumarathunge D
    344. Kuppler J
    345. Kurokawa H
    346. Kurosawa Y
    347. Kuyah S
    348. Laclau J-P
    349. Lafleur B
    350. Lallai E
    351. Lamb E
    352. Lamprecht A
    353. Larkin DJ
    354. Laughlin D
    355. Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y
    356. le Maire G
    357. le Roux PC
    358. le Roux E
    359. Lee T
    360. Lens F
    361. Lewis SL
    362. Lhotsky B
    363. Li Y
    364. Li X
    365. Lichstein JW
    366. Liebergesell M
    367. Lim JY
    368. Lin Y-S
    369. Linares JC
    370. Liu C
    371. Liu D
    372. Liu U
    373. Livingstone S
    374. Llusià J
    375. Lohbeck M
    376. López-García Á
    377. Lopez-Gonzalez G
    378. Lososová Z
    379. Louault F
    380. Lukács BA
    381. Lukeš P
    382. Luo Y
    383. Lussu M
    384. Ma S
    385. Maciel Rabelo Pereira C
    386. Mack M
    387. Maire V
    388. Mäkelä A
    389. Mäkinen H
    390. Malhado ACM
    391. Mallik A
    392. Manning P
    393. Manzoni S
    394. Marchetti Z
    395. Marchino L
    396. Marcilio V
    397. Marcon E
    398. Marignani M
    399. Markesteijn L
    400. Martin A
    401. Martínez-Garza C
    402. Martínez-Vilalta J
    403. Mašková T
    404. Mason K
    405. Mason N
    406. Massad TJ
    407. Masse J
    408. Mayrose I
    409. McCarthy J
    410. McCormack ML
    411. McCulloh K
    412. McFadden IR
    413. McGill BJ
    414. McPartland MY
    415. Medeiros JS
    416. Medlyn B
    417. Meerts P
    418. Mehrabi Z
    419. Meir P
    420. Melo FPL
    421. Mencuccini M
    422. Meredieu C
    423. Messier J
    424. Mészáros I
    425. Metsaranta J
    426. Michaletz ST
    427. Michelaki C
    428. Migalina S
    429. Milla R
    430. Miller JED
    431. Minden V
    432. Ming R
    433. Mokany K
    434. Moles AT
    435. Molnár A
    436. Molofsky J
    437. Molz M
    438. Montgomery RA
    439. Monty A
    440. Moravcová L
    441. Moreno-Martínez A
    442. Moretti M
    443. Mori AS
    444. Mori S
    445. Morris D
    446. Morrison J
    447. Mucina L
    448. Mueller S
    449. Muir CD
    450. Müller SC
    451. Munoz F
    452. Myers-Smith IH
    453. Myster RW
    454. Nagano M
    455. Naidu S
    456. Narayanan A
    457. Natesan B
    458. Negoita L
    459. Nelson AS
    460. Neuschulz EL
    461. Ni J
    462. Niedrist G
    463. Nieto J
    464. Niinemets Ü
    465. Nolan R
    466. Nottebrock H
    467. Nouvellon Y
    468. Novakovskiy A
    469. Nutrient Network
    470. Nystuen KO
    471. O’Grady A
    472. O’Hara K
    473. O’Reilly-Nugent A
    474. Oakley S
    475. Oberhuber W
    476. Ohtsuka T
    477. Oliveira R
    478. Öllerer K
    479. Olson ME
    480. Onipchenko V
    481. Onoda Y
    482. Onstein RE
    483. Ordonez JC
    484. Osada N
    485. Ostonen I
    486. Ottaviani G
    487. Otto S
    488. Overbeck GE
    489. Ozinga WA
    490. Pahl AT
    491. Paine CET
    492. Pakeman RJ
    493. Papageorgiou AC
    494. Parfionova E
    495. Pärtel M
    496. Patacca M
    497. Paula S
    498. Paule J
    499. Pauli H
    500. Pausas JG
    501. Peco B
    502. Penuelas J
    503. Perea A
    504. Peri PL
    505. Petisco-Souza AC
    506. Petraglia A
    507. Petritan AM
    508. Phillips OL
    509. Pierce S
    510. Pillar VD
    511. Pisek J
    512. Pomogaybin A
    513. Poorter H
    514. Portsmuth A
    515. Poschlod P
    516. Potvin C
    517. Pounds D
    518. Powell AS
    519. Power SA
    520. Prinzing A
    521. Puglielli G
    522. Pyšek P
    523. Raevel V
    524. Rammig A
    525. Ransijn J
    526. Ray CA
    527. Reich PB
    528. Reichstein M
    529. Reid DEB
    530. Réjou-Méchain M
    531. de Dios VR
    532. Ribeiro S
    533. Richardson S
    534. Riibak K
    535. Rillig MC
    536. Riviera F
    537. Robert EMR
    538. Roberts S
    539. Robroek B
    540. Roddy A
    541. Rodrigues AV
    542. Rogers A
    543. Rollinson E
    544. Rolo V
    545. Römermann C
    546. Ronzhina D
    547. Roscher C
    548. Rosell JA
    549. Rosenfield MF
    550. Rossi C
    551. Roy DB
    552. Royer-Tardif S
    553. Rüger N
    554. Ruiz-Peinado R
    555. Rumpf SB
    556. Rusch GM
    557. Ryo M
    558. Sack L
    559. Saldaña A
    560. Salgado-Negret B
    561. Salguero-Gomez R
    562. Santa-Regina I
    563. Santacruz-García AC
    564. Santos J
    565. Sardans J
    566. Schamp B
    567. Scherer-Lorenzen M
    568. Schleuning M
    569. Schmid B
    570. Schmidt M
    571. Schmitt S
    572. Schneider JV
    573. Schowanek SD
    574. Schrader J
    575. Schrodt F
    576. Schuldt B
    577. Schurr F
    578. Selaya Garvizu G
    579. Semchenko M
    580. Seymour C
    581. Sfair JC
    582. Sharpe JM
    583. Sheppard CS
    584. Sheremetiev S
    585. Shiodera S
    586. Shipley B
    587. Shovon TA
    588. Siebenkäs A
    589. Sierra C
    590. Silva V
    591. Silva M
    592. Sitzia T
    593. Sjöman H
    594. Slot M
    595. Smith NG
    596. Sodhi D
    597. Soltis P
    598. Soltis D
    599. Somers B
    600. Sonnier G
    601. Sørensen MV
    602. Sosinski EE Jr
    603. Soudzilovskaia NA
    604. Souza AF
    605. Spasojevic M
    606. Sperandii MG
    607. Stan AB
    608. Stegen J
    609. Steinbauer K
    610. Stephan JG
    611. Sterck F
    612. Stojanovic DB
    613. Strydom T
    614. Suarez ML
    615. Svenning J-C
    616. Svitková I
    617. Svitok M
    618. Svoboda M
    619. Swaine E
    620. Swenson N
    621. Tabarelli M
    622. Takagi K
    623. Tappeiner U
    624. Tarifa R
    625. Tauugourdeau S
    626. Tavsanoglu C
    627. Te Beest M
    628. Tedersoo L
    629. Thiffault N
    630. Thom D
    631. Thomas E
    632. Thompson K
    633. Thornton PE
    634. Thuiller W
    635. Tichý L
    636. Tissue D
    637. Tjoelker MG
    638. Tng DYP
    639. Tobias J
    640. Török P
    641. Tarin T
    642. Torres-Ruiz JM
    643. Tóthmérész B
    644. Treurnicht M
    645. Trivellone V
    646. Trolliet F
    647. Trotsiuk V
    648. Tsakalos JL
    649. Tsiripidis I
    650. Tysklind N
    651. Umehara T
    652. Usoltsev V
    653. Vadeboncoeur M
    654. Vaezi J
    655. Valladares F
    656. Vamosi J
    657. van Bodegom PM
    658. van Breugel M
    659. Van Cleemput E
    660. van de Weg M
    661. van der Merwe S
    662. van der Plas F
    663. van der Sande MT
    664. van Kleunen M
    665. Van Meerbeek K
    666. Vanderwel M
    667. Vanselow KA
    668. Vårhammar A
    669. Varone L
    670. Vasquez Valderrama MY
    671. Vassilev K
    672. Vellend M
    673. Veneklaas EJ
    674. Verbeeck H
    675. Verheyen K
    676. Vibrans A
    677. Vieira I
    678. Villacís J
    679. Violle C
    680. Vivek P
    681. Wagner K
    682. Waldram M
    683. Waldron A
    684. Walker AP
    685. Waller M
    686. Walther G
    687. Wang H
    688. Wang F
    689. Wang W
    690. Watkins H
    691. Watkins J
    692. Weber U
    693. Weedon JT
    694. Wei L
    695. Weigelt P
    696. Weiher E
    697. Wells AW
    698. Wellstein C
    699. Wenk E
    700. Westoby M
    701. Westwood A
    702. White PJ
    703. Whitten M
    704. Williams M
    705. Winkler DE
    706. Winter K
    707. Womack C
    708. Wright IJ
    709. Wright SJ
    710. Wright J
    711. Pinho BX
    712. Ximenes F
    713. Yamada T
    714. Yamaji K
    715. Yanai R
    716. Yankov N
    717. Yguel B
    718. Zanini KJ
    719. Zanne AE
    720. Zelený D
    721. Zhao Y-P
    722. Zheng J
    723. Zheng J
    724. Ziemińska K
    725. Zirbel CR
    726. Zizka G
    727. Zo-Bi IC
    728. Zotz G
    729. Wirth C

    (2020) TRY plant trait database - enhanced coverage and open access

    Global Change Biology 26:119–188.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14904

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Keesing F
    2. Holt RD
    3. Ostfeld RS

    (2006) Effects of species diversity on disease risk

    Ecology Letters 9:485–498.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00885.x

    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Keesing F
    2. Belden LK
    3. Daszak P
    4. Dobson A
    5. Harvell CD
    6. Holt RD
    7. Hudson P
    8. Jolles A
    9. Jones KE
    10. Mitchell CE
    11. Myers SS
    12. Bogich T
    13. Ostfeld RS

    (2010) Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases

    Nature 468:647–652.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09575

    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Keinath DA
    2. Doak DF
    3. Hodges KE
    4. Prugh LR
    5. Fagan W
    6. Sekercioglu CH
    7. Buchart SHM
    8. Kauffman M

    (2017) A global analysis of traits predicting species sensitivity to habitat fragmentation

    Global Ecology and Biogeography 26:115–127.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12509

    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Kirk D
    2. Shea D
    3. Start D

    (2019) Host traits and competitive ability jointly structure disease dynamics and community assembly

    The Journal of Animal Ecology 88:1379–1391.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13028

    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Laiolo P
    2. Pato J
    3. Obeso JR

    (2018) Ecological and evolutionary drivers of the elevational gradient of diversity

    Ecology Letters 21:1022–1032.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12967

    • Google Scholar
66. 1. LaManna JA
    2. Mangan SA
    3. Alonso A
    4. Bourg NA
    5. Brockelman WY
    6. Bunyavejchewin S
    7. Chang LW
    8. Chiang JM
    9. Chuyong GB
    10. Clay K
    11. Condit R
    12. Cordell S
    13. Davies SJ
    14. Furniss TJ
    15. Giardina CP
    16. Gunatilleke I
    17. Gunatilleke CVS
    18. He F
    19. Howe RW
    20. Hubbell SP
    21. Hsieh CF
    22. Inman-Narahari FM
    23. Janík D
    24. Johnson DJ
    25. Kenfack D
    26. Korte L
    27. Král K
    28. Larson AJ
    29. Lutz JA
    30. McMahon SM
    31. McShea WJ
    32. Memiaghe HR
    33. Nathalang A
    34. Novotny V
    35. Ong PS
    36. Orwig DA
    37. Ostertag R
    38. Parker GG
    39. Phillips RP
    40. Sack L
    41. Sun IF
    42. Tello JS
    43. Thomas DW
    44. Turner BL
    45. Díaz DMV
    46. Vrška T
    47. Weiblen GD
    48. Wolf A
    49. Yap S
    50. Myers JA

    (2017) Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale

    Science 356:1389–1392.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5678

    • Google Scholar
67. Book

    1. Lauber K
    2. Wagner G
    3. Gygax A

    (2018)

    Flora Helvetica-Illustrierte Flora Der Schweiz

    Verlag Paul Haupt.

    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Lavorel S
    2. Garnier E

    (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: Revisiting the Holy Grail

    Functional Ecology 16:545–556.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x

    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y
    2. Soliveres S
    3. Gross N
    4. Torices R
    5. Berdugo M
    6. Maestre FT

    (2019) Phylogenetic, functional, and taxonomic richness have both positive and negative effects on ecosystem multifunctionality

    PNAS 116:8419–8424.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815727116

    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Lefcheck JS

    (2016) piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7:573–579.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12512

    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Leitão RP
    2. Zuanon J
    3. Villéger S
    4. Williams SE
    5. Baraloto C
    6. Fortune C
    7. Mendonça FP
    8. Mouillot D

    (2016) Rare species contribute disproportionately to the functional structure of species assemblages

    Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 283:20160084.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0084

    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Liu X
    2. Lyu S
    3. Zhou S
    4. Bradshaw CJA

    (2016) Warming and fertilization alter the dilution effect of host diversity on disease severity

    Ecology 97:1680–1689.

    https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1784.1

    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Liu X
    2. Lyu S
    3. Sun D
    4. Bradshaw CJA
    5. Zhou S

    (2017) Species decline under nitrogen fertilization increases community-level competence of fungal diseases

    Proceedings. Biological Sciences 284:20162621.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2621

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Liu X
    2. Chen F
    3. Lyu S
    4. Sun D
    5. Zhou S

    (2018) Random species loss underestimates dilution effects of host diversity on foliar fungal diseases under fertilization

    Ecology and Evolution 8:1705–1713.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3749

    • Google Scholar
75. 1. LoGiudice K
    2. Ostfeld RS
    3. Schmidt KA
    4. Keesing F

    (2003) The ecology of infectious disease: Effects of host diversity and community composition on lyme disease risk

    PNAS 100:567–571.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0233733100

    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Malhi Y
    2. Silman M
    3. Salinas N
    4. Bush M
    5. Meir P
    6. Saatchi S

    (2010) Introduction: Elevation gradients in the tropics: Laboratories for ecosystem ecology and global change research

    Global Change Biology 16:3171–3175.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02323.x

    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Martin LB
    2. Burgan SC
    3. Adelman JS
    4. Gervasi SS

    (2016) Host competence: An organismal trait to integrate immunology and epidemiology

    Integrative and Comparative Biology 56:1225–1237.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icw064

    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Martin LB
    2. Addison BA
    3. Bean AGD

    (2019) Extreme Competence: Keystone Hosts of Infections

    Trends Ecol Evol 34:303–314.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.12.009

    • Google Scholar
79. 1. McGill BJ
    2. Enquist BJ
    3. Weiher E
    4. Westoby M

    (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits

    Trends Ecol Evol 21:178–185.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002

    • Google Scholar
80. 1. McMahon SM
    2. Harrison SP
    3. Armbruster WS
    4. Bartlein PJ
    5. Beale CM
    6. Edwards ME
    7. Kattge J
    8. Midgley G
    9. Morin X
    10. Prentice IC

    (2011) Improving assessment and modelling of climate change impacts on global terrestrial biodiversity

    Trends Ecol Evol 26:249–259.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.02.012

    • Google Scholar
81. Book

    1. McNew GL

    (1960)

    The nature, origin, and evolution of parasitism

    In: Horsfall JG, Dimond AE, editors. Plant Pathology: An Advanced Treatise. Academic Press. pp. 1–48.

    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Merckx T
    2. Souffreau C
    3. Kaiser A
    4. Baardsen LF
    5. Backeljau T
    6. Bonte D
    7. Brans KI
    8. Cours M
    9. Dahirel M
    10. Debortoli N
    11. De Wolf K
    12. Engelen JMT
    13. Fontaneto D
    14. Gianuca AT
    15. Govaert L
    16. Hendrickx F
    17. Higuti J
    18. Lens L
    19. Martens K
    20. Matheve H
    21. Matthysen E
    22. Piano E
    23. Sablon R
    24. Schön I
    25. Van Doninck K
    26. De Meester L
    27. Van Dyck H

    (2018) Body-size shifts in aquatic and terrestrial urban communities

    Nature 558:113–116.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0140-0

    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Messier J
    2. McGill BJ
    3. Lechowicz MJ

    (2010) How do traits vary across ecological scales? A case for trait-based ecology

    Ecology Letters 13:838–848.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01476.x

    • Google Scholar
84. Website

    1. MeteoSwiss

    (2020) Climate normals chur

    Accessed June 9, 2020.

    https://www.meteoswiss.admin.ch/product/output/climate-data/climate-diagrams-normal-values-station-processing/CHU/climsheet_CHU_np8110_e.pdf
85. 1. Mihaljevic JR
    2. Joseph MB
    3. Orlofske SA
    4. Paull SH
    5. Killilea M

    (2014) The Scaling of Host Density with Richness Affects the Direction, Shape, and Detectability of Diversity-Disease Relationships

    PLOS ONE 9:e97812.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097812

    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Mitchell CE
    2. Tilman D
    3. Groth J

    (2002) Effects of grassland plant species diversity, abundance, and composition on foliar fungal disease

    Ecology 83:1713–1726.

    https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1713:EOGPSD]2.0.CO;2

    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Mitchell CE
    2. Reich PB
    3. Tilman D
    4. Groth JV

    (2003) Effects of elevated CO 2 , nitrogen deposition, and decreased species diversity on foliar fungal plant disease

    Global Change Biology 9:438–451.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00602.x

    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Mordecai EA
    2. Caldwell JM
    3. Grossman MK
    4. Lippi CA
    5. Johnson LR
    6. Neira M
    7. Rohr JR
    8. Ryan SJ
    9. Savage V
    10. Shocket MS
    11. Sippy R
    12. Stewart Ibarra AM
    13. Thomas MB
    14. Villena O

    (2019) Thermal biology of mosquito-borne disease

    Ecology Letters 22:1690–1708.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13335

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Mouillot D
    2. Villéger S
    3. Scherer-Lorenzen M
    4. Mason NWH

    (2011) Functional structure of biological communities predicts ecosystem multifunctionality

    PLOS ONE 6:e17476.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017476

    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Newton AC
    2. Johnson SN
    3. Gregory PJ

    (2011) Implications of climate change for diseases, crop yields and food security

    Euphytica 179:3–18.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0359-4

    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Nunn CL
    2. Altizer SM
    3. Sechrest W
    4. Cunningham AA

    (2005) Latitudinal gradients of parasite species richness in primates

    Diversity & Distributions 11:249–256.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00160.x

    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Ostfeld RS
    2. Keesing F

    (2000) Biodiversity series: The function of biodiversity in the ecology of vector-borne zoonotic diseases

    Canadian Journal of Zoology 78:2061–2078.

    https://doi.org/10.1139/z00-172

    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Ostfeld RS
    2. LoGiudice K

    (2003) Community disassembly, biodiversity loss, and the erosion of an ecosystem service

    Ecology 84:1421–1427.

    https://doi.org/10.1890/02-3125

    • Google Scholar
94. Book

    1. Ozenda P

    (1985)

    La Végétation de La Chaîne Alpine Dans l’espace Montagnard Européen

    Masson.

    • Google Scholar
95. Book

    1. Pachauri RK
    2. Allen MR
    3. Barros VR
    4. Broome J
    5. Cramer W
    6. Christ R
    7. Church JA
    8. Clarke L
    9. Dahe Q
    10. Dasgupta P

    (2014)

    Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report

    Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.

    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Parker IM
    2. Gilbert GS

    (2018) Density-dependent disease, life-history trade-offs, and the effect of leaf pathogens on a suite of co-occurring close relatives

    The Journal of Ecology 106:1829–1838.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13024

    • Google Scholar
97. 1. Pellissier L
    2. Roger A
    3. Bilat J
    4. Rasmann S

    (2014) High elevation Plantago lanceolata plants are less resistant to herbivory than their low elevation conspecifics: Is it just temperature?

    Ecography (Cop) 37:950–959.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.00833

    • Google Scholar
98. 1. Pellissier L
    2. Descombes P
    3. Hagen O
    4. Chalmandrier L
    5. Glauser G
    6. Kergunteuil A
    7. Defossez E
    8. Rasmann S

    (2018) Growth-competition-herbivore resistance trade-offs and the responses of alpine plant communities to climate change

    Functional Ecology 32:1693–1703.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13075

    • Google Scholar
99. 1. Pfender WF
    2. Vollmer SS

    (1999) Freezing Temperature Effect on Survival of Puccinia graminis subsp graminicola in Festuca arundinacea and Lolium perenne

    Plant Disease 83:1058–1062.

    https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1999.83.11.1058

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
100. Software

     1. Pinheiro J
     2. Bates D
     3. DebRoy S
     4. Sarkar D

     (2016) Nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models R package

     R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

     https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
101. Software

     1. R Development Core Team

     (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R foundation for statistical computing

     R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

     http://www.r-project.org
102. 1. Reich PB
     2. Wright IJ
     3. Cavender-Bares J
     4. Craine JM
     5. Oleksyn J
     6. Westoby M
     7. Walters MB

     (2003) The evolution of plant functional variation: Traits, spectra, and strategies

     International Journal of Plant Sciences 164:374368.

     https://doi.org/10.1086/374368

     • Google Scholar
103. 1. Reich PB

     (2014) The world-wide “fast-slow” plant economics spectrum: A traits manifesto

     The Journal of Ecology 102:275–301.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12211

     • Google Scholar
104. 1. Ricklefs RE
     2. Wikelski M

     (2002) The physiology/life-history nexus

     Trends Ecol Evol 17:462–468.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02578-8

     • Google Scholar
105. 1. Rohr JR
     2. Dobson AP
     3. Johnson PTJ
     4. Kilpatrick MA
     5. Paull SH
     6. Raffel TR
     7. Ruiz-Moreno D
     8. Thomas MB

     (2011) Frontiers in climate change-disease research

     Trends Ecol Evol 26:270–277.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.002

     • Google Scholar
106. 1. Rohr JR
     2. Civitello DJ
     3. Halliday FW
     4. Hudson PJ
     5. Lafferty KD
     6. Wood CL
     7. Mordecai EA

     (2020) Towards common ground in the biodiversity–disease debate

     Nature Ecology & Evolution 4:24–33.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1060-6

     • Google Scholar
107. 1. Rolland C

     (2003) Spatial and seasonal variations of air temperature lapse rates in alpine regions

     Journal of Climate 16:1032–1046.

     https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)0162.0.CO;2

     • Google Scholar
108. 1. Roslin T
     2. Hardwick B
     3. Novotny V
     4. Petry WK
     5. Andrew NR
     6. Asmus A
     7. Barrio IC
     8. Basset Y
     9. Boesing AL
     10. Bonebrake TC
     11. Cameron EK
     12. Dáttilo W
     13. Donoso DA
     14. Drozd P
     15. Gray CL
     16. Hik DS
     17. Hill SJ
     18. Hopkins T
     19. Huang S
     20. Koane B
     21. Laird-Hopkins B
     22. Laukkanen L
     23. Lewis OT
     24. Milne S
     25. Mwesige I
     26. Nakamura A
     27. Nell CS
     28. Nichols E
     29. Prokurat A
     30. Sam K
     31. Schmidt NM
     32. Slade A
     33. Slade V
     34. Suchanková A
     35. Teder T
     36. van NS
     37. Vandvik V
     38. Weissflog A
     39. Zhukovich V
     40. Slade EM

     (2017) Higher predation risk for insect prey at low latitudes and elevations

     Science 356:742–744.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAJ1631

     • Google Scholar
109. 1. Rottstock T
     2. Joshi J
     3. Kummer V
     4. Fischer M

     (2014) Higher plant diversity promotes higher diversity of fungal pathogens, while it decreases pathogen infection per plant

     Ecology 95:1907–1917.

     https://doi.org/10.1890/13-2317.1

     • Google Scholar
110. 1. Roy BA
     2. Güsewell S
     3. Harte J

     (2004) Response of plant pathogens and herbivores to a warming experiment

     Ecology 85:2570–2581.

     https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0182

     • Google Scholar
111. 1. Schemske DW
     2. Mittelbach GG
     3. Cornell H
     4. Sobel JM
     5. Roy K

     (2009) Is there a latitudinal gradient in the importance of biotic interactions

     Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40:245–269.

     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173430

     • Google Scholar
112. 1. Seabloom EW
     2. Borer ET
     3. Gross K
     4. Kendig AE
     5. Lacroix C
     6. Mitchell CE
     7. Mordecai EA
     8. Power AG

     (2015) The community ecology of pathogens: Coinfection, coexistence and community composition

     Ecology Letters 18:401–415.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12418

     • Google Scholar
113. 1. Sears BF
     2. Snyder PW
     3. Rohr JR

     (2015) Host life history and host-parasite syntopy predict behavioural resistance and tolerance of parasites

     The Journal of Animal Ecology 84:625–636.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12333

     • Google Scholar
114. 1. Start D
     2. Gilbert B

     (2019) Trait variation across biological scales shapes community structure and ecosystem function

     Ecology 100:e02769.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2769

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
115. 1. Stearns SC

     (1989) Trade-offs in life-history evolution

     Functional Ecology 3:259.

     https://doi.org/10.2307/2389364

     • Google Scholar
116. Book

     1. Stearns SC

     (1992)

     The Evolution of Life Histories

     Oxford University Press.

     • Google Scholar
117. 1. Stewart Merrill TE
     2. Johnson PTJ

     (2020) Towards a mechanistic understanding of competence: A missing link in diversity-disease research

     Parasitology 147:1159–1170.

     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182020000943

     • Google Scholar
118. 1. Sundqvist MK
     2. Sanders NJ
     3. Wardle DA

     (2013) Community and ecosystem responses to elevational gradients: Processes, mechanisms, and insights for global change

     Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 44:261–280.

     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135750

     • Google Scholar
119. 1. Tapsoba H
     2. Wilson JP

     (1997) Effects of temperature and light on germination of urediniospores of the pearl millet rust pathogen

     Puccinia Substriata Var. Indica. Plant Dis 81:1049–1052.

     https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.9.1049

     • Google Scholar
120. 1. Thompson JN

     (1999) Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of coevolution

     The American Naturalist 153:S1–S14.

     https://doi.org/10.1086/303208

     • Google Scholar
121. 1. Van de Peer T
     2. Verheyen K
     3. Ponette Q
     4. Setiawan NN
     5. Muys B

     (2018) Overyielding in young tree plantations is driven by local complementarity and selection effects related to shade tolerance

     The Journal of Ecology 106:1096–1105.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12839

     • Google Scholar
122. 1. Violle C
     2. Enquist BJ
     3. McGill BJ
     4. Jiang L
     5. Albert CH
     6. Hulshof C
     7. Jung V
     8. Messier J

     (2012) The return of the variance: Intraspecific variability in community ecology

     Trends Ecol Evol 27:244–252.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.014

     • Google Scholar
123. 1. Waugh MM
     2. Kim DH
     3. Ferrin DM
     4. Stanghellini ME

     (2003) Reproductive potential of Monosporascus cannonballus

     Plant Dis 87:45–50.

     https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.1.45

     • Google Scholar
124. 1. Welsh ME
     2. Cronin JP
     3. Mitchell CE

     (2016) The role of habitat filtering in the leaf economics spectrum and plant susceptibility to pathogen infection

     The Journal of Ecology 104:1768–1777.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12632

     • Google Scholar
125. 1. Welsh ME
     2. Cronin JP
     3. Mitchell CE

     (2020) Trait-based variation in host contribution to pathogen transmission across species and resource supplies

     Ecology 101:e03164.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3164

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
126. 1. Whittaker RH

     (1956) Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains

     Ecological Monographs 26:1–80.

     https://doi.org/10.2307/1943577

     • Google Scholar
127. 1. Wild J
     2. Kopecký M
     3. Macek M
     4. Šanda M
     5. Jankovec J
     6. Haase T

     (2019) Climate at ecologically relevant scales: A new temperature and soil moisture logger for long-term microclimate measurement

     Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 268:40–47.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.12.018

     • Google Scholar
128. 1. Wolinska J
     2. King KC

     (2009) Environment can alter selection in host-parasite interactions

     Trends in Parasitology 25:236–244.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2009.02.004

     • Google Scholar
129. 1. Wright IJ
     2. Reich PB
     3. Westoby M
     4. Ackerly DD
     5. Baruch Z
     6. Bongers F
     7. Cavender-Bares J
     8. Chapin T
     9. Cornelissen JHC
     10. Diemer M
     11. Flexas J
     12. Garnier E
     13. Groom PK
     14. Gulias J
     15. Hikosaka K
     16. Lamont BB
     17. Lee T
     18. Lee W
     19. Lusk C
     20. Midgley JJ
     21. Navas M-L
     22. Niinemets U
     23. Oleksyn J
     24. Osada N
     25. Poorter H
     26. Poot P
     27. Prior L
     28. Pyankov VI
     29. Roumet C
     30. Thomas SC
     31. Tjoelker MG
     32. Veneklaas EJ
     33. Villar R

     (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum

     Nature 428:821–827.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02403

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
130. 1. Yáñez-López R

     (2012) The effect of climate change on plant diseases

     African J Biotechnol 11:2417–2428.

     https://doi.org/10.5897/ajb10.2442

     • Google Scholar
131. 1. Ziv Y
     2. Davidowitz G

     (2019) When landscape ecology meets physiology: Effects of habitat fragmentation on resource allocation trade-offs

     Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7:137.

     https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00137

     • Google Scholar
132. Book

     1. Zuur AF
     2. Ieno EN
     3. Walker NJ
     4. Saveliev AA
     5. Smith GM

     (2009)

     Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R (Http://Www.Highstat.Com/)

     New York: NY Spring Sci Bus Media.

     • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Fletcher W Halliday

   Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Contributed equally with

   Mikko Jalo

   For correspondence

   Fletcher.w.halliday@gmail.com

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3953-0861

2. Mikko Jalo

   Faculty of Biological and Environmental sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Contributed equally with

   Fletcher W Halliday

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Anna-Liisa Laine

   1. Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
   2. Faculty of Biological and Environmental sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, funding-acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0703-5850

• 2,002

  views

• 257

  downloads

• 18

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.