A δ-cell subpopulation with pro-β cell identity contributes to efficient age-independent recovery in a zebrafish diabetes model

Abstract

Restoring damaged b-cells in diabetic patients by harnessing the plasticity of other pancreatic cells raises the questions of the efficiency of the process and of the functionality of the new Insulin-expressing cells. To overcome the weak regenerative capacity of mammals, we used regeneration-prone zebrafish to study b-cells arising following destruction. We show that most new insulin cells differ from the original b-cells as they coexpress Somatostatin and Insulin. These bihormonal cells are abundant, functional and able to normalize glycemia. Their formation in response to b-cell destruction is fast, efficient and age-independent. Bihormonal cells are transcriptionally close to a subset of d-cells that we identified in control islets and which are characterized by the expression of somatostatin 1.1 (sst1.1) and by genes essential for glucose-induced Insulin secretion in β-cells such as pdx1, slc2a2 and gck. We observed in vivo the conversion of monohormonal sst1.1-expressing cells to sst1.1+ ins+ bihormonal cells following b-cell destruction. Our findings support the conclusion that sst1.1 d-cells possess a pro-b identity enabling them to contribute to the neogenesis of Insulin-producing cells during regeneration. This work unveils that abundant and functional bihormonal cells benefit to diabetes recovery in zebrafish.

Data availability

RNA sequencing data have been deposited at NCBI GEO

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Claudio Andrés Carril Pardo

    Zebrafish Development and Disease Models laboratory, GIGA-Stem Cells, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Laura Massoz

    Zebrafish Development and Disease Models laboratory, GIGA-Stem Cells, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Marie A Dupont

    Zebrafish Development and Disease Models laboratory, GIGA-Stem Cells, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. David Bergemann

    Zebrafish Development and Disease Models laboratory, GIGA-Stem Cells, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Jordane Bourdouxhe

    Zebrafish Development and Disease Models laboratory, GIGA-Stem Cells, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Arnaud Lavergne

    GIGA-Genomics core facility, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Estefania Tarifeño-Saldivia

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Christian SM Helker

    Department of Developmental Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Didier YR Stainier true

    Department of Developmental Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany
    Competing interests
    Didier YR Stainier, Senior editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0382-0026
  10. Bernard Peers

    Zebrafish Development and Disease Models laboratory, GIGA-Stem Cells, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Marianne M Voz

    Zebrafish Development and Disease Models laboratory, GIGA-Stem Cellslls, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Isabelle Manfroid

    Zebrafish Development and Disease Models laboratory, GIGA-Stem Cells, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
    For correspondence
    Isabelle.Manfroid@uliege.be
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3445-3764

Funding

Chilean National Agency for Research and Development , Becas Chile (Scholarship,72170660)

  • Claudio Andrés Carril Pardo

National Belgian Funds for Scientific Research (FRIA PhD fellowship)

  • Arnaud Lavergne

National Belgian Funds for Scientific Research (FRIA PhD fellowship)

  • Laura Massoz

National Belgian Funds for Scientific Research (EoS Program,30826052)

  • Marie A Dupont

National Belgian Funds for Scientific Research (FRIA PhD fellowship)

  • David Bergemann

National Belgian Funds for Scientific Research (EoS Program,30826052)

  • Jordane Bourdouxhe

European Regional Development Fund (Biomed Hub Technology Support,2.2.1/996)

  • Arnaud Lavergne

National Belgian Funds for Scientific Research

  • Bernard Peers

National Belgian Funds for Scientific Research

  • Isabelle Manfroid

National Belgian Funds for Scientific Research

  • Marianne M Voz

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were carried out in compliance with the European Union and Belgian law and with the approval of the ULiège Ethical Committee for experiments with laboratory animals (approval numbers 14-1662, 16-1872, 19-2083, 21-2353).

Copyright

© 2022, Carril Pardo et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,881
    views
  • 331
    downloads
  • 24
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Claudio Andrés Carril Pardo
  2. Laura Massoz
  3. Marie A Dupont
  4. David Bergemann
  5. Jordane Bourdouxhe
  6. Arnaud Lavergne
  7. Estefania Tarifeño-Saldivia
  8. Christian SM Helker
  9. Didier YR Stainier true
  10. Bernard Peers
  11. Marianne M Voz
  12. Isabelle Manfroid
(2022)
A δ-cell subpopulation with pro-β cell identity contributes to efficient age-independent recovery in a zebrafish diabetes model
eLife 11:e67576.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67576

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67576

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Ryan M Finnerty, Daniel J Carulli ... Wipawee Winuthayanon
    Research Article

    The oviduct is the site of fertilization and preimplantation embryo development in mammals. Evidence suggests that gametes alter oviductal gene expression. To delineate the adaptive interactions between the oviduct and gamete/embryo, we performed a multi-omics characterization of oviductal tissues utilizing bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq), and proteomics collected from distal and proximal at various stages after mating in mice. We observed robust region-specific transcriptional signatures. Specifically, the presence of sperm induces genes involved in pro-inflammatory responses in the proximal region at 0.5 days post-coitus (dpc). Genes involved in inflammatory responses were produced specifically by secretory epithelial cells in the oviduct. At 1.5 and 2.5 dpc, genes involved in pyruvate and glycolysis were enriched in the proximal region, potentially providing metabolic support for developing embryos. Abundant proteins in the oviductal fluid were differentially observed between naturally fertilized and superovulated samples. RNA-seq data were used to identify transcription factors predicted to influence protein abundance in the proteomic data via a novel machine learning model based on transformers of integrating transcriptomics and proteomics data. The transformers identified influential transcription factors and correlated predictive protein expressions in alignment with the in vivo-derived data. Lastly, we found some differences between inflammatory responses in sperm-exposed mouse oviducts compared to hydrosalpinx Fallopian tubes from patients. In conclusion, our multi-omics characterization and subsequent in vivo confirmation of proteins/RNAs indicate that the oviduct is adaptive and responsive to the presence of sperm and embryos in a spatiotemporal manner.

    1. Cell Biology
    Hyunggu Hahn, Carole Daly ... Alex RB Thomsen
    Research Article

    Chemokine receptors are GPCRs that regulate the chemotactic migration of a wide variety of cells including immune and cancer cells. Most chemokine receptors contain features associated with the ability to stimulate G protein signaling during β-arrestin-mediated receptor internalization into endosomes. As endosomal signaling of certain non-GPCR receptors plays a major role in cell migration, we chose to investigate the potential role of endosomal chemokine receptor signaling on mechanisms governing this function. Applying a combination of pharmacological and cell biological approaches, we demonstrate that the model chemokine receptor CCR7 recruits G protein and β-arrestin simultaneously upon chemokine stimulation, which enables internalized receptors to activate G protein from endosomes. Furthermore, spatiotemporal-resolved APEX2 proteome profiling shows that endosomal CCR7 uniquely enriches specific Rho GTPase regulators as compared to plasma membrane CCR7, which is directly associated with enhanced activity of the Rho GTPase Rac1 and chemotaxis of immune T cells. As Rac1 drives the formation of membrane protrusions during chemotaxis, our findings suggest an important integrated function of endosomal chemokine receptor signaling in cell migration.