Motor cortex activity across movement speeds is predicted by network-level strategies for generating muscle activity
Abstract
Learned movements can be skillfully performed at different paces. What neural strategies produce this flexibility? Can they be predicted and understood by network modeling? We trained monkeys to perform a cycling task at different speeds, and trained artificial recurrent networks to generate the empirical muscle-activity patterns. Network solutions reflected the principle that smooth well-behaved dynamics require low trajectory tangling. Network solutions had a consistent form, which yielded quantitative and qualitative predictions. To evaluate predictions, we analyzed motor cortex activity recorded during the same task. Responses supported the hypothesis that the dominant neural signals reflect not muscle activity, but network-level strategies for generating muscle activity. Single-neuron responses were better accounted for by network activity than by muscle activity. Similarly, neural population trajectories shared their organization not with muscle trajectories, but with network solutions. Thus, cortical activity could be understood based on the need to generate muscle activity via dynamics that allow smooth, robust control over movement speed.
Data availability
Neural and EMG data have been deposited in figshare: https://figshare.com/s/b2a0557c239a1010d8ea
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Grossman Center for the Statistics of Mind
- Mark M Churchland
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (FG-2015-65496)
- Mark M Churchland
Simons Foundation (542963)
- Mark M Churchland
NIH (1U19NS104649)
- Mark M Churchland
NIH (5T32NS064929)
- Mark M Churchland
Kavli Foundation
- Mark M Churchland
Simons Foundation (325171)
- Mark M Churchland
Swiss National Science Foundation (P2SKP2 178197)
- Mark M Churchland
Swiss National Science Foundation (P400P2 186759)
- Mark M Churchland
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All protocols were in accord with the National Institutes of Health guidelines and approved by the Columbia University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. (Protocol number AC-AABE3550)
Copyright
© 2022, Saxena et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 5,783
- views
-
- 982
- downloads
-
- 64
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Citations by DOI
-
- 64
- citations for umbrella DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67620