Motor cortex activity across movement speeds is predicted by network-level strategies for generating muscle activity

  1. Shreya Saxena
  2. Abigail A Russo
  3. John Cunningham
  4. Mark M Churchland  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Florida, United States
  2. Columbia University, United States

Abstract

Learned movements can be skillfully performed at different paces. What neural strategies produce this flexibility? Can they be predicted and understood by network modeling? We trained monkeys to perform a cycling task at different speeds, and trained artificial recurrent networks to generate the empirical muscle-activity patterns. Network solutions reflected the principle that smooth well-behaved dynamics require low trajectory tangling. Network solutions had a consistent form, which yielded quantitative and qualitative predictions. To evaluate predictions, we analyzed motor cortex activity recorded during the same task. Responses supported the hypothesis that the dominant neural signals reflect not muscle activity, but network-level strategies for generating muscle activity. Single-neuron responses were better accounted for by network activity than by muscle activity. Similarly, neural population trajectories shared their organization not with muscle trajectories, but with network solutions. Thus, cortical activity could be understood based on the need to generate muscle activity via dynamics that allow smooth, robust control over movement speed.

Data availability

Neural and EMG data have been deposited in figshare: https://figshare.com/s/b2a0557c239a1010d8ea

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shreya Saxena

    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Abigail A Russo

    Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. John Cunningham

    Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Mark M Churchland

    Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    mc3502@columbia.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9123-6526

Funding

Grossman Center for the Statistics of Mind

  • Mark M Churchland

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (FG-2015-65496)

  • Mark M Churchland

Simons Foundation (542963)

  • Mark M Churchland

NIH (1U19NS104649)

  • Mark M Churchland

NIH (5T32NS064929)

  • Mark M Churchland

Kavli Foundation

  • Mark M Churchland

Simons Foundation (325171)

  • Mark M Churchland

Swiss National Science Foundation (P2SKP2 178197)

  • Mark M Churchland

Swiss National Science Foundation (P400P2 186759)

  • Mark M Churchland

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All protocols were in accord with the National Institutes of Health guidelines and approved by the Columbia University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. (Protocol number AC-AABE3550)

Copyright

© 2022, Saxena et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,592
    views
  • 965
    downloads
  • 60
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Shreya Saxena
  2. Abigail A Russo
  3. John Cunningham
  4. Mark M Churchland
(2022)
Motor cortex activity across movement speeds is predicted by network-level strategies for generating muscle activity
eLife 11:e67620.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67620

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67620

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Kayson Fakhar, Fatemeh Hadaeghi ... Claus C Hilgetag
    Research Article

    Efficient communication in brain networks is foundational for cognitive function and behavior. However, how communication efficiency is defined depends on the assumed model of signaling dynamics, e.g., shortest path signaling, random walker navigation, broadcasting, and diffusive processes. Thus, a general and model-agnostic framework for characterizing optimal neural communication is needed. We address this challenge by assigning communication efficiency through a virtual multi-site lesioning regime combined with game theory, applied to large-scale models of human brain dynamics. Our framework quantifies the exact influence each node exerts over every other, generating optimal influence maps given the underlying model of neural dynamics. These descriptions reveal how communication patterns unfold if regions are set to maximize their influence over one another. Comparing these maps with a variety of brain communication models showed that optimal communication closely resembles a broadcasting regime in which regions leverage multiple parallel channels for information dissemination. Moreover, we found that the brain’s most influential regions are its rich-club, exploiting their topological vantage point by broadcasting across numerous pathways that enhance their reach even if the underlying connections are weak. Altogether, our work provides a rigorous and versatile framework for characterizing optimal brain communication, and uncovers the most influential brain regions, and the topological features underlying their influence.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Tanya Wolff, Mark Eddison ... Gerald M Rubin
    Research Article

    The central complex (CX) plays a key role in many higher-order functions of the insect brain including navigation and activity regulation. Genetic tools for manipulating individual cell types, and knowledge of what neurotransmitters and neuromodulators they express, will be required to gain mechanistic understanding of how these functions are implemented. We generated and characterized split-GAL4 driver lines that express in individual or small subsets of about half of CX cell types. We surveyed neuropeptide and neuropeptide receptor expression in the central brain using fluorescent in situ hybridization. About half of the neuropeptides we examined were expressed in only a few cells, while the rest were expressed in dozens to hundreds of cells. Neuropeptide receptors were expressed more broadly and at lower levels. Using our GAL4 drivers to mark individual cell types, we found that 51 of the 85 CX cell types we examined expressed at least one neuropeptide and 21 expressed multiple neuropeptides. Surprisingly, all co-expressed a small molecule neurotransmitter. Finally, we used our driver lines to identify CX cell types whose activation affects sleep, and identified other central brain cell types that link the circadian clock to the CX. The well-characterized genetic tools and information on neuropeptide and neurotransmitter expression we provide should enhance studies of the CX.