Endothelial Pannexin 1-TRPV4 channel signaling lowers pulmonary arterial pressure in mice

  1. Zdravka Daneva
  2. Matteo Ottolini
  3. Yen Lin Chen
  4. Eliska Klimentova
  5. Maniselvan Kuppusamy
  6. Soham A Shah
  7. Richard D Minshall
  8. Cheikh I Seye
  9. Victor E Laubach
  10. Brant E Isakson
  11. Swapnil K Sonkusare  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Virginia, United States
  2. University of Illinois, United States
  3. University of Missouri, United States

Abstract

Pannexin 1 (Panx1), an ATP-efflux pathway, has been linked with inflammation in pulmonary capillaries. However, the physiological roles of endothelial Panx1 in the pulmonary vasculature are unknown. Endothelial transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) channels lower pulmonary artery (PA) contractility and exogenous ATP activates of endothelial TRPV4 channels. We hypothesized that endothelial Panx1-ATP-TRPV4 channel signaling promotes vasodilation and lowers pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP). Endothelial, but not smooth muscle, knockout of Panx1 increased PA contractility and raised PAP in mice. Flow/shear stress increased ATP efflux through endothelial Panx1 in PAs. Panx1-effluxed extracellular ATP signaled through purinergic P2Y2 receptor (P2Y2R) to activate protein kinase Ca (PKCa), which in turn activated endothelial TRPV4 channels. Finally, caveolin-1 provided a signaling scaffold for endothelial Panx1, P2Y2R, PKCa, and TRPV4 channels in PAs, promoting their spatial proximity and enabling signaling interactions. These results indicate that endothelial Panx1-P2Y2R-TRPV4 channel signaling, facilitated by caveolin-1, reduces PA contractility and lowers PAP in mice.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript. Individual numeric values are shown in the scatterplots for each dataset. An excel sheet with source data for Figure 1J has been provided.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zdravka Daneva

    Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Matteo Ottolini

    Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yen Lin Chen

    Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Eliska Klimentova

    Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Maniselvan Kuppusamy

    Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Soham A Shah

    Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Richard D Minshall

    Pharmacology, University of Illinois, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Cheikh I Seye

    Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Victor E Laubach

    Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Brant E Isakson

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Swapnil K Sonkusare

    Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    For correspondence
    swapnil.sonkusare@virginia.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9587-9342

Funding

National Institutes of Health (HL146914)

  • Swapnil K Sonkusare

National Institutes of Health (HL142808)

  • Swapnil K Sonkusare

National Institutes of Health (HL157407)

  • Victor E Laubach
  • Swapnil K Sonkusare

National Institutes of Health (P01HL120840)

  • Brant E Isakson

National Institutes of Health (HL137112)

  • Brant E Isakson

National Institutes of Health (R01HL133293)

  • Victor E Laubach

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal protocols were approved by the University of Virginia Animal Care and Use Committee (protocols 4100 and 4120). This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. For surgical procedures, every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Copyright

© 2021, Daneva et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,563
    views
  • 216
    downloads
  • 35
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zdravka Daneva
  2. Matteo Ottolini
  3. Yen Lin Chen
  4. Eliska Klimentova
  5. Maniselvan Kuppusamy
  6. Soham A Shah
  7. Richard D Minshall
  8. Cheikh I Seye
  9. Victor E Laubach
  10. Brant E Isakson
  11. Swapnil K Sonkusare
(2021)
Endothelial Pannexin 1-TRPV4 channel signaling lowers pulmonary arterial pressure in mice
eLife 10:e67777.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67777

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67777

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Birol Cabukusta, Shalom Borst Pauwels ... Jacques Neefjes
    Research Article

    Numerous lipids are heterogeneously distributed among organelles. Most lipid trafficking between organelles is achieved by a group of lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) that carry lipids using their hydrophobic cavities. The human genome encodes many intracellular LTPs responsible for lipid trafficking and the function of many LTPs in defining cellular lipid levels and distributions is unclear. Here, we created a gene knockout library targeting 90 intracellular LTPs and performed whole-cell lipidomics analysis. This analysis confirmed known lipid disturbances and identified new ones caused by the loss of LTPs. Among these, we found major sphingolipid imbalances in ORP9 and ORP11 knockout cells, two proteins of previously unknown function in sphingolipid metabolism. ORP9 and ORP11 form a heterodimer to localize at the ER-trans-Golgi membrane contact sites, where the dimer exchanges phosphatidylserine (PS) for phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PI(4)P) between the two organelles. Consequently, loss of either protein causes phospholipid imbalances in the Golgi apparatus that result in lowered sphingomyelin synthesis at this organelle. Overall, our LTP knockout library toolbox identifies various proteins in control of cellular lipid levels, including the ORP9-ORP11 heterodimer, which exchanges PS and PI(4)P at the ER-Golgi membrane contact site as a critical step in sphingomyelin synthesis in the Golgi apparatus.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Kien Xuan Ngo, Huong T Vu ... Taro Uyeda
    Research Article

    The mechanism underlying the preferential and cooperative binding of cofilin and the expansion of clusters toward the pointed-end side of actin filaments remains poorly understood. To address this, we conducted a principal component analysis based on available filamentous actin (F-actin) and C-actin (cofilins were excluded from cofilactin) structures and compared to monomeric G-actin. The results strongly suggest that C-actin, rather than F-ADP-actin, represented the favourable structure for binding preference of cofilin. High-speed atomic force microscopy explored that the shortened bare half helix adjacent to the cofilin clusters on the pointed end side included fewer actin protomers than normal helices. The mean axial distance (MAD) between two adjacent actin protomers along the same long-pitch strand within shortened bare half helices was longer (5.0–6.3 nm) than the MAD within typical helices (4.3–5.6 nm). The inhibition of torsional motion during helical twisting, achieved through stronger attachment to the lipid membrane, led to more pronounced inhibition of cofilin binding and cluster formation than the presence of inorganic phosphate (Pi) in solution. F-ADP-actin exhibited more naturally supertwisted half helices than F-ADP.Pi-actin, explaining how Pi inhibits cofilin binding to F-actin with variable helical twists. We propose that protomers within the shorter bare helical twists, either influenced by thermal fluctuation or induced allosterically by cofilin clusters, exhibit characteristics of C-actin-like structures with an elongated MAD, leading to preferential and cooperative binding of cofilin.