Abstract

Integral outer membrane proteins (OMPs) are crucial for the maintenance of the proteobacterial envelope permeability barrier to some antibiotics and detergents. In Enterobacteria, envelope stress caused by unfolded OM proteins (OMPs) activates the sigmaE (σE) transcriptional response. σE upregulates OMP-biogenesis factors, including the b-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) that catalyzes OMP folding. Here we report that DolP (formerly YraP), a σE-upregulated and poorly understood OM lipoprotein, is crucial for fitness in cells that undergo envelope stress. We demonstrate that DolP interacts with the BAM complex by associating to OM-assembled BamA. We provide evidence that DolP is important for proper folding of BamA that overaccumulates in the OM, thus supporting OMP biogenesis and OM integrity. Notably, mid-cell recruitment of DolP had been linked to regulation of septal peptidoglycan remodelling by an unknown mechanism. We now reveal that, during envelope stress, DolP loses its association with the mid-cell, thereby suggesting a mechanistic link between envelope stress caused by impaired OMP biogenesis and the regulation of a late step of cell division.

Data availability

All data generated and analysed during this study are available in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data related to the CRISPRi screen are provided in the supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. David Ranava

    Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5841-7699
  2. Yiying Yang

    Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Luis Orenday-Tapia

    Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1134-0823
  4. François Rousset

    Microbiology Department, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Catherine Turlan

    Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Violette Morales

    Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Lun Cui

    Microbiology Department, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Cyril Moulin

    Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Carine Froment

    Institute of Pharmacology and Structural Biology, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Gladys Munoz

    Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Jérôme Rech

    Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Julien Marcoux

    Institute of Pharmacology and Structural Biology, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7321-7436
  13. Anne Caumont-Sarcos

    Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Cécile Albenne

    Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. David Bikard

    Synthetic Biology Laboratory, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5729-1211
  16. Raffaele Ieva

    Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    For correspondence
    raffaele.ieva@univ-tlse3.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3405-0650

Funding

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (ATIP-Avenir)

  • Raffaele Ieva

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-INBS-08)

  • Julien Marcoux

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID)

  • David Bikard

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (PostDoc Fellowship)

  • David Ranava

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Bavesh D Kana, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

Version history

  1. Received: February 24, 2021
  2. Accepted: April 4, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 13, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 28, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Ranava et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,470
    views
  • 387
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. David Ranava
  2. Yiying Yang
  3. Luis Orenday-Tapia
  4. François Rousset
  5. Catherine Turlan
  6. Violette Morales
  7. Lun Cui
  8. Cyril Moulin
  9. Carine Froment
  10. Gladys Munoz
  11. Jérôme Rech
  12. Julien Marcoux
  13. Anne Caumont-Sarcos
  14. Cécile Albenne
  15. David Bikard
  16. Raffaele Ieva
(2021)
Lipoprotein DolP supports proper folding of BamA in the bacterial outer membrane, promoting fitness upon envelope stress
eLife 10:e67817.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67817

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67817

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Alexander D Cook, Mark Carrington, Matthew K Higgins
    Research Article

    African trypanosomes replicate within infected mammals where they are exposed to the complement system. This system centres around complement C3, which is present in a soluble form in serum but becomes covalently deposited onto the surfaces of pathogens after proteolytic cleavage to C3b. Membrane-associated C3b triggers different complement-mediated effectors which promote pathogen clearance. To counter complement-mediated clearance, African trypanosomes have a cell surface receptor, ISG65, which binds to C3b and which decreases the rate of trypanosome clearance in an infection model. However, the mechanism by which ISG65 reduces C3b function has not been determined. We reveal through cryogenic electron microscopy that ISG65 has two distinct binding sites for C3b, only one of which is available in C3 and C3d. We show that ISG65 does not block the formation of C3b or the function of the C3 convertase which catalyses the surface deposition of C3b. However, we show that ISG65 forms a specific conjugate with C3b, perhaps acting as a decoy. ISG65 also occludes the binding sites for complement receptors 2 and 3, which may disrupt recruitment of immune cells, including B cells, phagocytes, and granulocytes. This suggests that ISG65 protects trypanosomes by combining multiple approaches to dampen the complement cascade.

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Michael D Sacco, Lauren R Hammond ... Yu Chen
    Research Article

    In the Firmicutes phylum, GpsB is a membrane associated protein that coordinates peptidoglycan synthesis with cell growth and division. Although GpsB has been studied in several bacteria, the structure, function, and interactome of Staphylococcus aureus GpsB is largely uncharacterized. To address this knowledge gap, we solved the crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of S. aureus GpsB, which adopts an atypical, asymmetric dimer, and demonstrates major conformational flexibility that can be mapped to a hinge region formed by a three-residue insertion exclusive to Staphylococci. When this three-residue insertion is excised, its thermal stability increases, and the mutant no longer produces a previously reported lethal phenotype when overexpressed in Bacillus subtilis. In S. aureus, we show that these hinge mutants are less functional and speculate that the conformational flexibility imparted by the hinge region may serve as a dynamic switch to finetune the function of the GpsB complex and/or to promote interaction with its various partners. Furthermore, we provide the first biochemical, biophysical, and crystallographic evidence that the N-terminal domain of GpsB binds not only PBP4, but also FtsZ, through a conserved recognition motif located on their C-termini, thus coupling peptidoglycan synthesis to cell division. Taken together, the unique structure of S. aureus GpsB and its direct interaction with FtsZ/PBP4 provide deeper insight into the central role of GpsB in S. aureus cell division.