Generation of a CRF1-Cre transgenic rat and the role of central amygdala CRF1 cells in nociception and anxiety-like behavior
Abstract
Corticotropin-releasing factor type-1 (CRF1) receptors are critical to stress responses because they allow neurons to respond to CRF released in response to stress. Our understanding of the precise role of CRF1-expressing neuronal populations in CRF-mediated behaviors has been largely limited to mouse experiments due to the lack of genetic tools available to selectively visualize and manipulate CRF1+ cells in rats. Here, we describe the generation and validation of a transgenic CRF1-Cre-tdTomato rat, which expresses a bicistronic iCre-2A-tdTomato transgene directed by 200kb of promoter and enhancer sequence surrounding the Crhr1 cDNA present within a BAC clone, that has been transgenically inserted into the rat genome. We report that Crhr1 and Cre mRNA expression are highly colocalized in CRF1-Cre-tdTomato rats within both the central amygdala (CeA), composed of mostly GABAergic neurons, and in the basolateral amygdala (BLA), composed of mostly glutamatergic neurons. In the CeA, membrane properties, inhibitory synaptic transmission, and responses to CRF bath application in tdTomato+ neurons are similar to those previously reported in GFP+ cells in CRFR1-GFP mice. We show that stimulatory DREADD receptors can be selectively targeted to CeA CRF1+ cells via virally delivered Cre-dependent transgenes, that transfected Cre/tdTomato+ cells are activated by clozapine-n-oxide in vitro and in vivo, and that activation of these cells in vivo increases anxiety-like behavior and nocifensive responses. Outside the amygdala, we show that Cre-tdTomato is expressed in several brain areas across the rostrocaudal axis of the CRF1-Cre-tdTomato rat brain, and that the expression pattern of Cre-tdTomato cells is similar to the known expression pattern of CRF1 cells. Given the accuracy of expression in the CRF1-Cre rat, modern genetic techniques used to investigate the anatomy, physiology, and behavioral function of CRF1+ neurons and circuits can now be performed in assays that require the use of rats as the model organism.
Data availability
All data generated during this study are included in the manuscript.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01,AA023305)
- Nicholas W Gilpin
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R21,AA026022)
- Melissa Herman
- Nicholas W Gilpin
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R00,AA023002)
- Melissa Herman
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (National Research Service Award,AA027145)
- Marcus M Weera
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (Institutional Training Grant,AA007577)
- Marcus M Weera
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (Merit Award,#I01 BX003451)
- Nicholas W Gilpin
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health, and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the respective institutions at which procedures occurred (Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, University of Texas Health Sciences Center). (LSUHSC IACUC Protocol #3749; UNC IACUC Protocol #19-190; UTHSC IACUC Protocol #21-075)
Reviewing Editor
- Matthew N Hill, University of Calgary, Canada
Version history
- Preprint posted: February 23, 2021 (view preprint)
- Received: February 24, 2021
- Accepted: April 6, 2022
- Accepted Manuscript published: April 7, 2022 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: April 22, 2022 (version 2)
Copyright
This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Metrics
-
- 1,636
- Page views
-
- 232
- Downloads
-
- 6
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
The functional complementarity of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and optokinetic reflex (OKR) allows for optimal combined gaze stabilization responses (CGR) in light. While sensory substitution has been reported following complete vestibular loss, the capacity of the central vestibular system to compensate for partial peripheral vestibular loss remains to be determined. Here, we first demonstrate the efficacy of a 6-week subchronic ototoxic protocol in inducing transient and partial vestibular loss which equally affects the canal- and otolith-dependent VORs. Immunostaining of hair cells in the vestibular sensory epithelia revealed that organ-specific alteration of type I, but not type II, hair cells correlates with functional impairments. The decrease in VOR performance is paralleled with an increase in the gain of the OKR occurring in a specific range of frequencies where VOR normally dominates gaze stabilization, compatible with a sensory substitution process. Comparison of unimodal OKR or VOR versus bimodal CGR revealed that visuo-vestibular interactions remain reduced despite a significant recovery in the VOR. Modeling and sweep-based analysis revealed that the differential capacity to optimally combine OKR and VOR correlates with the reproducibility of the VOR responses. Overall, these results shed light on the multisensory reweighting occurring in pathologies with fluctuating peripheral vestibular malfunction.
-
- Neuroscience
Genuinely new discovery transcends existing knowledge. Despite this, many analyses in systems neuroscience neglect to test new speculative hypotheses against benchmark empirical facts. Some of these analyses inadvertently use circular reasoning to present existing knowledge as new discovery. Here, I discuss that this problem can confound key results and estimate that it has affected more than three thousand studies in network neuroscience over the last decade. I suggest that future studies can reduce this problem by limiting the use of speculative evidence, integrating existing knowledge into benchmark models, and rigorously testing proposed discoveries against these models. I conclude with a summary of practical challenges and recommendations.