Similar neural and perceptual masking effects of low-power optogenetic stimulation in primate V1

  1. Spencer Chin-Yu Chen
  2. Giacomo Benvenuti
  3. Yuzhi Chen
  4. Satwant Kumar
  5. Charu Ramakrishnan
  6. Karl Deisseroth
  7. Wilson S Geisler
  8. Eyal Seidemann  Is a corresponding author
  1. Rutgers University, United States
  2. The University of Texas at Austin, United States
  3. Stanford University, United States

Abstract

Can direct stimulation of primate V1 substitute for a visual stimulus and mimic its perceptual effect? To address this question, we developed an optical-genetic toolkit to 'read' neural population responses using widefield calcium imaging, while simultaneously using optogenetics to 'write' neural responses into V1 of behaving macaques. We focused on the phenomenon of visual masking, where detection of a dim target is significantly reduced by a co-localized medium-brightness mask [1, 2]. Using our toolkit, we tested whether V1 optogenetic stimulation can recapitulate the perceptual masking effect of a visual mask. We find that, similar to a visual mask, low-power optostimulation can significantly reduce visual detection sensitivity, that a sublinear interaction between visual and optogenetic evoked V1 responses could account for this perceptual effect, and that these neural and behavioral effects are spatially selective. Our toolkit and results open the door for further exploration of perceptual substitutions by direct stimulation of sensory cortex.

Data availability

The data and Matlab code for visualization are available on Dryad Digital Repository, doi:10.5061/dryad.00000003h.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Spencer Chin-Yu Chen

    Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Giacomo Benvenuti

    Center for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5234-6260
  3. Yuzhi Chen

    Center for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Satwant Kumar

    Center for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Charu Ramakrishnan

    Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Karl Deisseroth

    Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Wilson S Geisler

    Center for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Eyal Seidemann

    Center for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    For correspondence
    eyal@austin.utexas.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2841-5948

Funding

NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research (EY-016454)

  • Eyal Seidemann

NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research (EY-024662)

  • Wilson S Geisler

NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research (BRAIN U01-NS099720)

  • Wilson S Geisler
  • Eyal Seidemann

DARPA-NESD (N66001-17-C-4012)

  • Eyal Seidemann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures have been approved by the University of Texas Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC protocol #AUP-2016-00274) and conform to NIH standards.

Copyright

© 2022, Chen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,352
    views
  • 205
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Spencer Chin-Yu Chen
  2. Giacomo Benvenuti
  3. Yuzhi Chen
  4. Satwant Kumar
  5. Charu Ramakrishnan
  6. Karl Deisseroth
  7. Wilson S Geisler
  8. Eyal Seidemann
(2022)
Similar neural and perceptual masking effects of low-power optogenetic stimulation in primate V1
eLife 11:e68393.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68393

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68393

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Chen Wang, Berta Vidal ... Oliver Hobert
    Tools and Resources

    Mapping neurotransmitter identities to neurons is key to understanding information flow in a nervous system. It also provides valuable entry points for studying the development and plasticity of neuronal identity features. In the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system, neurotransmitter identities have been largely assigned by expression pattern analysis of neurotransmitter pathway genes that encode neurotransmitter biosynthetic enzymes or transporters. However, many of these assignments have relied on multicopy reporter transgenes that may lack relevant cis-regulatory information and therefore may not provide an accurate picture of neurotransmitter usage. We analyzed the expression patterns of 16 CRISPR/Cas9-engineered knock-in reporter strains for all main types of neurotransmitters in C. elegans (glutamate, acetylcholine, GABA, serotonin, dopamine, tyramine, and octopamine) in both the hermaphrodite and the male. Our analysis reveals novel sites of expression of these neurotransmitter systems within both neurons and glia, as well as non-neural cells, most notably in gonadal cells. The resulting expression atlas defines neurons that may be exclusively neuropeptidergic, substantially expands the repertoire of neurons capable of co-transmitting multiple neurotransmitters, and identifies novel sites of monoaminergic neurotransmitter uptake. Furthermore, we also observed unusual co-expression patterns of monoaminergic synthesis pathway genes, suggesting the existence of novel monoaminergic transmitters. Our analysis results in what constitutes the most extensive whole-animal-wide map of neurotransmitter usage to date, paving the way for a better understanding of neuronal communication and neuronal identity specification in C. elegans.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Haojing Duan, Runye Shi ... Jianfeng Feng
    Research Article

    Structural brain aging has demonstrated strong inter-individual heterogeneity and mirroring patterns with brain development. However, due to the lack of large-scale longitudinal neuroimaging studies, most of the existing research focused on the cross-sectional changes of brain aging. In this investigation, we present a data-driven approach that incorporate both cross-sectional changes and longitudinal trajectories of structural brain aging and identified two brain aging patterns among 37,013 healthy participants from UK Biobank. Participants with accelerated brain aging also demonstrated accelerated biological aging, cognitive decline and increased genetic susceptibilities to major neuropsychiatric disorders. Further, by integrating longitudinal neuroimaging studies from a multi-center adolescent cohort, we validated the ‘last in, first out’ mirroring hypothesis and identified brain regions with manifested mirroring patterns between brain aging and brain development. Genomic analyses revealed risk loci and genes contributing to accelerated brain aging and delayed brain development, providing molecular basis for elucidating the biological mechanisms underlying brain aging and related disorders.