A transient postnatal quiescent period precedes emergence of mature cortical dynamics

  1. Soledad Dominguez
  2. Liang Ma
  3. Han Yu
  4. Gabrielle Pouchelon
  5. Christian Mayer
  6. George D Spyropoulos
  7. Claudia Cea
  8. György Buzsáki
  9. Gordon Fishell
  10. Dion Khodagholy  Is a corresponding author
  11. Jennifer N Gelinas  Is a corresponding author
  1. Columbia University, United States
  2. Harvard University, United States
  3. Max Planck, Germany
  4. New York University, United States
  5. Harvard Medical School, United States

Abstract

Mature neural networks synchronize and integrate spatiotemporal activity patterns to support cognition. Emergence of these activity patterns and functions is believed to be developmentally regulated, but the postnatal time course for neural networks to perform complex computations remains unknown. We investigate the progression of large-scale synaptic and cellular activity patterns across development using high spatiotemporal resolution in vivo electrophysiology in immature mice. We reveal that mature cortical processes emerge rapidly and simultaneously after a discrete but volatile transition period at the beginning of the second postnatal week of rodent development. The transition is characterized by relative neural quiescence, after which spatially distributed, temporally precise, and internally organized activity occurs. We demonstrate a similar developmental trajectory in humans, suggesting an evolutionarily conserved mechanism that could facilitate a transition in network operation. We hypothesize that this transient quiescent period is a requisite for the subsequent emergence of coordinated cortical networks.

Data availability

Source data are presented in Supplementary Figures and uploaded to Dryad. Data pertaining to human subjects is governed by IRB policy and can be accessed through application to the IRB. Pooled, processed human subject data are uploaded to Dryad.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Soledad Dominguez

    Neurology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Liang Ma

    Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Han Yu

    Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Gabrielle Pouchelon

    Neurobiology, Harvard University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Christian Mayer

    Neurobiology, Max Planck, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. George D Spyropoulos

    Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, new York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Claudia Cea

    Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. György Buzsáki

    Neuroscience Institute, Langone Medical Center, Department of Neurology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3100-4800
  9. Gordon Fishell

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9640-9278
  10. Dion Khodagholy

    Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    dk2955@Columbia.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Jennifer N Gelinas

    Neurology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    jng2146@cumc.columbia.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1164-638X

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R21 EY032381)

  • Dion Khodagholy
  • Jennifer N Gelinas

H2020 European Research Council (Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 799501)

  • Soledad Dominguez

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Columbia University Irving Medical Center.protocol AABI5568.

Human subjects: We retrospectively analyzed EEG recordings from 54 patients who underwent continuous monitoring with surface electroencephalography (EEG) as part of clinical diagnostic assessment. Analysis of these data were approved by the Institutional Review Board at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, and all data collection occurred at this institution. All data reviewed was initially obtained for clinical management purposes and informed consent was waived as per 45 CFR 46.116.

Copyright

© 2021, Dominguez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,973
    views
  • 337
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Soledad Dominguez
  2. Liang Ma
  3. Han Yu
  4. Gabrielle Pouchelon
  5. Christian Mayer
  6. George D Spyropoulos
  7. Claudia Cea
  8. György Buzsáki
  9. Gordon Fishell
  10. Dion Khodagholy
  11. Jennifer N Gelinas
(2021)
A transient postnatal quiescent period precedes emergence of mature cortical dynamics
eLife 10:e69011.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69011

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69011

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Sven Ohl, Martin Rolfs
    Research Article

    Detecting causal relations structures our perception of events in the world. Here, we determined for visual interactions whether generalized (i.e. feature-invariant) or specialized (i.e. feature-selective) visual routines underlie the perception of causality. To this end, we applied a visual adaptation protocol to assess the adaptability of specific features in classical launching events of simple geometric shapes. We asked observers to report whether they observed a launch or a pass in ambiguous test events (i.e. the overlap between two discs varied from trial to trial). After prolonged exposure to causal launch events (the adaptor) defined by a particular set of features (i.e. a particular motion direction, motion speed, or feature conjunction), observers were less likely to see causal launches in subsequent ambiguous test events than before adaptation. Crucially, adaptation was contingent on the causal impression in launches as demonstrated by a lack of adaptation in non-causal control events. We assessed whether this negative aftereffect transfers to test events with a new set of feature values that were not presented during adaptation. Processing in specialized (as opposed to generalized) visual routines predicts that the transfer of visual adaptation depends on the feature similarity of the adaptor and the test event. We show that the negative aftereffects do not transfer to unadapted launch directions but do transfer to launch events of different speeds. Finally, we used colored discs to assign distinct feature-based identities to the launching and the launched stimulus. We found that the adaptation transferred across colors if the test event had the same motion direction as the adaptor. In summary, visual adaptation allowed us to carve out a visual feature space underlying the perception of causality and revealed specialized visual routines that are tuned to a launch’s motion direction.

    1. Neuroscience
    Gergely F Turi, Sasa Teng ... Yueqing Peng
    Research Article

    Synchronous neuronal activity is organized into neuronal oscillations with various frequency and time domains across different brain areas and brain states. For example, hippocampal theta, gamma, and sharp wave oscillations are critical for memory formation and communication between hippocampal subareas and the cortex. In this study, we investigated the neuronal activity of the dentate gyrus (DG) with optical imaging tools during sleep-wake cycles in mice. We found that the activity of major glutamatergic cell populations in the DG is organized into infraslow oscillations (0.01–0.03 Hz) during NREM sleep. Although the DG is considered a sparsely active network during wakefulness, we found that 50% of granule cells and about 25% of mossy cells exhibit increased activity during NREM sleep, compared to that during wakefulness. Further experiments revealed that the infraslow oscillation in the DG was correlated with rhythmic serotonin release during sleep, which oscillates at the same frequency but in an opposite phase. Genetic manipulation of 5-HT receptors revealed that this neuromodulatory regulation is mediated by Htr1a receptors and the knockdown of these receptors leads to memory impairment. Together, our results provide novel mechanistic insights into how the 5-HT system can influence hippocampal activity patterns during sleep.