Regulation of pulmonary surfactant by the adhesion GPCR GPR116/ADGRF5 requires a tethered agonist-mediated activation mechanism

  1. James P Bridges
  2. Caterina Safina
  3. Bernard Pirard
  4. Kari Brown
  5. Alyssa Filuta
  6. Ravichandran Panchanathan
  7. Rochdi Bouhelal
  8. Nicole Reymann
  9. Sejal Patel
  10. Klaus Seuwen
  11. William E Miller
  12. Marie-Gabrielle Ludwig  Is a corresponding author
  1. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, United States
  2. Novartis, Switzerland
  3. University of Cincinnati, United States
  4. Novartis, United States

Abstract

The mechanistic details of the tethered agonist mode of activation for the adhesion GPCR ADGRF5/GPR116 has not been completely deciphered. We set out to investigate the physiologic importance of autocatalytic cleavage upstream of the agonistic peptide sequence, an event necessary for NTF displacement and subsequent receptor activation. To examine this hypothesis, we characterized tethered agonist-mediated activation of GPR116 in vitro and in vivo. A knock-in mouse expressing a non-cleavable GPR116 mutant phenocopies the pulmonary phenotype of GPR116 knock-out mice, demonstrating that tethered agonist-mediated receptor activation is indispensable for function in vivo. Using site-directed mutagenesis and species swapping approaches we identified key conserved amino acids for GPR116 activation in the tethered agonist sequence and in extracellular loops 2/3 (ECL2/3). We further highlight residues in transmembrane7 (TM7) that mediate stronger signaling in mouse versus human GPR116 and recapitulate these findings in a model supporting tethered agonist:ECL2 interactions for GPR116 activation.

Data availability

Source data for the modeling is provided (coordinates of the model)

Article and author information

Author details

  1. James P Bridges

    Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Caterina Safina

    Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    Caterina Safina, is employed by and shareholder of Novartis Pharma AG..
  3. Bernard Pirard

    Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    Bernard Pirard, is employed by and shareholder of Novartis Pharma AG..
  4. Kari Brown

    Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Alyssa Filuta

    Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Ravichandran Panchanathan

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Rochdi Bouhelal

    Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    Rochdi Bouhelal, is employed by and shareholder of Novartis Pharma AG..
  8. Nicole Reymann

    Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    Nicole Reymann, is employed by and shareholders of Novartis Pharma AG.
  9. Sejal Patel

    Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Novartis, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Sejal Patel, is employed by and shareholder of Novartis Pharma AG..
  10. Klaus Seuwen

    Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    Klaus Seuwen, is employed by and shareholder of Novartis Pharma AG..
  11. William E Miller

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Marie-Gabrielle Ludwig

    Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    marie-gabrielle.ludwig@novartis.com
    Competing interests
    Marie-Gabrielle Ludwig, is employed by and shareholder of Novartis Pharma AG..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7799-4782

Funding

National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the NIH (HL131634)

  • Caterina Safina
  • Bernard Pirard

This work was funded in part by the NIH grant listed above.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal procedures were performed under protocols (AS2842_05_22; JPB) approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of National Jewish Health in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines.

Copyright

© 2022, Bridges et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,208
    views
  • 270
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. James P Bridges
  2. Caterina Safina
  3. Bernard Pirard
  4. Kari Brown
  5. Alyssa Filuta
  6. Ravichandran Panchanathan
  7. Rochdi Bouhelal
  8. Nicole Reymann
  9. Sejal Patel
  10. Klaus Seuwen
  11. William E Miller
  12. Marie-Gabrielle Ludwig
(2022)
Regulation of pulmonary surfactant by the adhesion GPCR GPR116/ADGRF5 requires a tethered agonist-mediated activation mechanism
eLife 11:e69061.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69061

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69061

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Yajun Zhai, Peiyi Liu ... Gongzheng Hu
    Research Article

    Discovering new strategies to combat the multidrug-resistant bacteria constitutes a major medical challenge of our time. Previously, artesunate (AS) has been reported to exert antibacterial enhancement activity in combination with β-lactam antibiotics via inhibition of the efflux pump AcrB. However, combination of AS and colistin (COL) revealed a weak synergistic effect against a limited number of strains, and few studies have further explored its possible mechanism of synergistic action. In this article, we found that AS and EDTA could strikingly enhance the antibacterial effects of COL against mcr-1- and mcr-1+ Salmonella strains either in vitro or in vivo, when used in triple combination. The excellent bacteriostatic effect was primarily related to the increased cell membrane damage, accumulation of toxic compounds and inhibition of MCR-1. The potential binding sites of AS to MCR-1 (THR283, SER284, and TYR287) were critical for its inhibition of MCR-1 activity. Additionally, we also demonstrated that the CheA of chemosensory system and virulence-related protein SpvD were critical for the bacteriostatic synergistic effects of the triple combination. Selectively targeting CheA, SpvD, or MCR using the natural compound AS could be further investigated as an attractive strategy for the treatment of Salmonella infection. Collectively, our work opens new avenues toward the potentiation of COL and reveals an alternative drug combination strategy to overcome COL-resistant bacterial infections.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Adam D Longhurst, Kyle Wang ... David P Toczyski
    Tools and Resources

    Progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle is the most highly regulated step in cellular division. We employed a chemogenetic approach to discover novel cellular networks that regulate cell cycle progression. This approach uncovered functional clusters of genes that altered sensitivity of cells to inhibitors of the G1/S transition. Mutation of components of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 rescued proliferation inhibition caused by the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, but not to inhibitors of S phase or mitosis. In addition to its core catalytic subunits, mutation of the PRC2.1 accessory protein MTF2, but not the PRC2.2 protein JARID2, rendered cells resistant to palbociclib treatment. We found that PRC2.1 (MTF2), but not PRC2.2 (JARID2), was critical for promoting H3K27me3 deposition at CpG islands genome-wide and in promoters. This included the CpG islands in the promoter of the CDK4/6 cyclins CCND1 and CCND2, and loss of MTF2 lead to upregulation of both CCND1 and CCND2. Our results demonstrate a role for PRC2.1, but not PRC2.2, in antagonizing G1 progression in a diversity of cell linages, including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), breast cancer, and immortalized cell lines.