Multiphoton imaging of neural structure and activity in Drosophila through the intact cuticle

  1. Max Jameson Aragon
  2. Aaron T Mok
  3. Jamien Shea
  4. Mengran Wang
  5. Haein Kim
  6. Nathan Barkdull
  7. Chris Xu
  8. Nilay Yapici  Is a corresponding author
  1. Princeton University, United States
  2. Cornell University, United States
  3. University of Florida, United States

Abstract

We developed a multiphoton imaging method to capture neural structure and activity in behaving flies through the intact cuticles. Our measurements show that the fly head cuticle has surprisingly high transmission at wavelengths > 900 nm, and the difficulty of through-cuticle imaging is due to the air sacs and/or fat tissue underneath the head cuticle. By compressing or removing the air sacs, we performed multiphoton imaging of the fly brain through the intact cuticle. Our anatomical and functional imaging results show that 2- and 3-photon imaging are comparable in superficial regions such as the mushroom body, but 3-photon imaging is superior in deeper regions such as the central complex and beyond. We further demonstrated 2-photon through-cuticle functional imaging of odor-evoked calcium responses from the mushroom body g-lobes in behaving flies short-term and long-term. The through-cuticle imaging method developed here extends the time limits of in vivo imaging in flies and opens new ways to capture neural structure and activity from the fly brain.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Max Jameson Aragon

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Aaron T Mok

    School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jamien Shea

    Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Mengran Wang

    School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Haein Kim

    Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Nathan Barkdull

    Department of Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1174-5046
  7. Chris Xu

    School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3493-6427
  8. Nilay Yapici

    Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    For correspondence
    ny96@cornell.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1130-5083

Funding

National Science Foundation (DBI-1707312)

  • Nilay Yapici

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM133698)

  • Nilay Yapici

Pew Charitable Trusts (Scholars Award)

  • Nilay Yapici

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (Scholars Award)

  • Nilay Yapici

American Federation for Aging Research (Grants for Junior Faculty)

  • Nilay Yapici

National Science Foundation (DBI-1707312)

  • Chris Xu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Upinder Singh Bhalla, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, India

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: October 9, 2019 (view preprint)
  2. Received: April 4, 2021
  3. Accepted: January 23, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: January 24, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: January 25, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: February 15, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2022, Aragon et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,431
    Page views
  • 550
    Downloads
  • 10
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: PubMed Central, Crossref, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Max Jameson Aragon
  2. Aaron T Mok
  3. Jamien Shea
  4. Mengran Wang
  5. Haein Kim
  6. Nathan Barkdull
  7. Chris Xu
  8. Nilay Yapici
(2022)
Multiphoton imaging of neural structure and activity in Drosophila through the intact cuticle
eLife 11:e69094.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69094

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69094

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Kiwamu Kudo, Kamalini G Ranasinghe ... Srikantan S Nagarajan
    Research Article

    Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-β and misfolded tau proteins causing synaptic dysfunction, and progressive neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Altered neural oscillations have been consistently demonstrated in AD. However, the trajectories of abnormal neural oscillations in AD progression and their relationship to neurodegeneration and cognitive decline are unknown. Here, we deployed robust event-based sequencing models (EBMs) to investigate the trajectories of long-range and local neural synchrony across AD stages, estimated from resting-state magnetoencephalography. The increases in neural synchrony in the delta-theta band and the decreases in the alpha and beta bands showed progressive changes throughout the stages of the EBM. Decreases in alpha and beta band synchrony preceded both neurodegeneration and cognitive decline, indicating that frequency-specific neuronal synchrony abnormalities are early manifestations of AD pathophysiology. The long-range synchrony effects were greater than the local synchrony, indicating a greater sensitivity of connectivity metrics involving multiple regions of the brain. These results demonstrate the evolution of functional neuronal deficits along the sequence of AD progression.

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Luisa Fassi, Shachar Hochman ... Roi Cohen Kadosh
    Research Article

    In recent years, there has been debate about the effectiveness of treatments from different fields, such as neurostimulation, neurofeedback, brain training, and pharmacotherapy. This debate has been fuelled by contradictory and nuanced experimental findings. Notably, the effectiveness of a given treatment is commonly evaluated by comparing the effect of the active treatment versus the placebo on human health and/or behaviour. However, this approach neglects the individual’s subjective experience of the type of treatment she or he received in establishing treatment efficacy. Here, we show that individual differences in subjective treatment - the thought of receiving the active or placebo condition during an experiment - can explain variability in outcomes better than the actual treatment. We analysed four independent datasets (N = 387 participants), including clinical patients and healthy adults from different age groups who were exposed to different neurostimulation treatments (transcranial magnetic stimulation: Studies 1 and 2; transcranial direct current stimulation: Studies 3 and 4). Our findings show that the inclusion of subjective treatment can provide a better model fit either alone or in interaction with objective treatment (defined as the condition to which participants are assigned in the experiment). These results demonstrate the significant contribution of subjective experience in explaining the variability of clinical, cognitive, and behavioural outcomes. We advocate for existing and future studies in clinical and non-clinical research to start accounting for participants’ subjective beliefs and their interplay with objective treatment when assessing the efficacy of treatments. This approach will be crucial in providing a more accurate estimation of the treatment effect and its source, allowing the development of effective and reproducible interventions.