Long non-coding RNA Neat1 and paraspeckle components are translational regulators in hypoxia

Abstract

Internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) drive translation initiation during stress. In response to hypoxia, (lymph)angiogenic factors responsible for tissue revascularization in ischemic diseases are induced by the IRES-dependent mechanism. Here we searched for IRES trans-acting factors (ITAFs) active in early hypoxia in mouse cardiomyocytes. Using knock-down and proteomics approaches, we show a link between a stressed-induced nuclear body, the paraspeckle, and IRES-dependent translation. Furthermore, smiFISH experiments demonstrate the recruitment of IRES-containing mRNA into paraspeckle during hypoxia. Our data reveal that the long non-coding RNA Neat1, an essential paraspeckle component, is a key translational regulator, active on IRESs of (lymph)angiogenic and cardioprotective factor mRNAs. In addition, paraspeckle proteins p54nrb and PSPC1 as well as nucleolin and RPS2, two p54nrb-interacting proteins identified by mass spectrometry, are ITAFs for IRES subgroups. Paraspeckle thus appears as a platform to recruit IRES-containing mRNAs and possibly host IRESome assembly. Polysome PCR array shows that Neat1 isoforms regulate IRES-dependent translation and, more widely, translation of mRNAs involved in stress response.

Data availability

Lentivector plasmid sequences are available on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2330r1band doi:10.5061/dryad.m0cfxpp75.The MS proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD024067.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Anne-Claire Godet

    Inserm UMR 1297, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Emilie Roussel

    Inserm UMR 1297, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Florian P David

    Inserm UMR 1297, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9842-1548
  4. Fransky Hantelys

    Inserm UMR 1297, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Florent Morfoisse

    Inserm UMR 1297, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Joffrey Alves

    Inserm UMR 1297, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Françoise Pujol

    Inserm UMR 1297, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Isabelle Ader

    Inserm, UMR 1301, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Edouard Bertrand

    Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, Mont[ellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Odile Burlet-Schiltz

    Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Carine Froment

    Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3688-5560
  12. Anthony K Henras

    5Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology Unit, CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Patrice Vitali

    5Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology Unit, CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Eric Lacazette

    Inserm UMR 1297, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Florence Tatin

    Inserm UMR 1297, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Barbara Garmy-Susini

    Inserm UMR 1297, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Anne-Catherine Prats

    Inserm UMR 1297, Toulouse, France
    For correspondence
    anne-catherine.prats@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5282-3776

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-CE11-0020-RIBOCARD)

  • Anne-Catherine Prats

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ProFI ANR-10-INBS-08)

  • Odile Burlet-Schiltz
  • Carine Froment

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Godet et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,757
    views
  • 201
    downloads
  • 12
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Anne-Claire Godet
  2. Emilie Roussel
  3. Florian P David
  4. Fransky Hantelys
  5. Florent Morfoisse
  6. Joffrey Alves
  7. Françoise Pujol
  8. Isabelle Ader
  9. Edouard Bertrand
  10. Odile Burlet-Schiltz
  11. Carine Froment
  12. Anthony K Henras
  13. Patrice Vitali
  14. Eric Lacazette
  15. Florence Tatin
  16. Barbara Garmy-Susini
  17. Anne-Catherine Prats
(2022)
Long non-coding RNA Neat1 and paraspeckle components are translational regulators in hypoxia
eLife 11:e69162.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69162

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69162

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Parijat Biswas, Priyanka Roy ... Deepak Kumar Sinha
    Research Article Updated

    The excessive cosolute densities in the intracellular fluid create a physicochemical condition called macromolecular crowding (MMC). Intracellular MMC entropically maintains the biochemical thermodynamic equilibria by favoring associative reactions while hindering transport processes. Rapid cell volume shrinkage during extracellular hypertonicity elevates the MMC and disrupts the equilibria, potentially ushering cell death. Consequently, cells actively counter the hypertonic stress through regulatory volume increase (RVI) and restore the MMC homeostasis. Here, we establish fluorescence anisotropy of EGFP as a reliable tool for studying cellular MMC and explore the spatiotemporal dynamics of MMC during cell volume instabilities under multiple conditions. Our studies reveal that the actin cytoskeleton enforces spatially varying MMC levels inside adhered cells. Within cell populations, MMC is uncorrelated with nuclear DNA content but anti-correlated with the cell spread area. Although different cell lines have statistically similar MMC distributions, their responses to extracellular hypertonicity vary. The intensity of the extracellular hypertonicity determines a cell’s ability for RVI, which correlates with nuclear factor kappa beta (NFkB) activation. Pharmacological inhibition and knockdown experiments reveal that tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1) initiates the hypertonicity-induced NFkB signaling and RVI. At severe hypertonicities, the elevated MMC amplifies cytoplasmic microviscosity and hinders receptor interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) recruitment at the TNFR1 complex, incapacitating the TNFR1-NFkB signaling and consequently, RVI. Together, our studies unveil the involvement of TNFR1-NFkB signaling in modulating RVI and demonstrate the pivotal role of MMC in determining cellular osmoadaptability.

    1. Cell Biology
    Fabian Link, Sisco Jung ... Brooke Morriswood
    Research Article

    The actin cytoskeleton is a ubiquitous feature of eukaryotic cells, yet its complexity varies across different taxa. In the parasitic protist Trypanosoma brucei, a rudimentary actomyosin system consisting of one actin gene and two myosin genes has been retained despite significant investment in the microtubule cytoskeleton. The functions of this highly simplified actomyosin system remain unclear, but appear to centre on the endomembrane system. Here, advanced light and electron microscopy imaging techniques, together with biochemical and biophysical assays, were used to explore the relationship between the actomyosin and endomembrane systems. The class I myosin (TbMyo1) had a large cytosolic pool and its ability to translocate actin filaments in vitro was shown here for the first time. TbMyo1 exhibited strong association with the endosomal system and was additionally found on glycosomes. At the endosomal membranes, TbMyo1 colocalised with markers for early and late endosomes (TbRab5A and TbRab7, respectively), but not with the marker associated with recycling endosomes (TbRab11). Actin and myosin were simultaneously visualised for the first time in trypanosomes using an anti-actin chromobody. Disruption of the actomyosin system using the actin-depolymerising drug latrunculin A resulted in a delocalisation of both the actin chromobody signal and an endosomal marker, and was accompanied by a specific loss of endosomal structure. This suggests that the actomyosin system is required for maintaining endosomal integrity in T. brucei.