Physical observables to determine the nature of membrane-less cellular sub-compartments

  1. Mathias L Heltberg
  2. Judith Miné-Hattab
  3. Angela Taddei
  4. Aleksandra M Walczak  Is a corresponding author
  5. Thierry Mora  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut Curie, France
  2. Institut Curie, PSL University, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Nuclear Dynamics, France
  3. École Normale Supérieure, France

Abstract

The spatial organization of complex biochemical reactions is essential for the regulation of cellular processes. Membrane-less structures called foci containing high concentrations of specific proteins have been reported in a variety of contexts, but the mechanism of their formation is not fully understood. Several competing mechanisms exist that are difficult to distinguish empirically, including liquid-liquid phase separation, and the trapping of molecules by multiple binding sites. Here we propose a theoretical framework and outline observables to differentiate between these scenarios from single molecule tracking experiments. In the binding site model, we derive relations between the distribution of proteins, their diffusion properties, and their radial displacement. We predict that protein search times can be reduced for targets inside a liquid droplet, but not in an aggregate of slowly moving binding sites. We use our results to reject the multiple binding site model for Rad52 foci, and find a picture consistent with a liquid-liquid phase separation. These results are applicable to future experiments and suggest different biological roles for liquid droplet and binding site foci.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mathias L Heltberg

    UMR 3664 - Nuclear Dynamics, Institut Curie, paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Judith Miné-Hattab

    Institut Curie, PSL University, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Nuclear Dynamics, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9986-4092
  3. Angela Taddei

    UMR3664, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3217-0739
  4. Aleksandra M Walczak

    Laboratoire de Physique Theorique, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    aleksandra.walczak@phys.ens.fr
    Competing interests
    Aleksandra M Walczak, eLife senior editor.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2686-5702
  5. Thierry Mora

    Laboratoire de Physique Theorique, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    thierry.mora@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5456-9361

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Q-life 356 ANR-17-CONV-0005)

  • Mathias L Heltberg
  • Judith Miné-Hattab
  • Angela Taddei
  • Aleksandra M Walczak
  • Thierry Mora

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (80' MITI project PhONeS)

  • Judith Miné-Hattab
  • Angela Taddei

H2020 European Research Council (COG 724208)

  • Mathias L Heltberg
  • Aleksandra M Walczak
  • Thierry Mora

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-CE12-0007)

  • Judith Miné-Hattab
  • Angela Taddei

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-12-PDOC- 0035?01)

  • Judith Miné-Hattab
  • Angela Taddei

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (DEP20151234398)

  • Judith Miné-Hattab
  • Angela Taddei

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Heltberg et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mathias L Heltberg
  2. Judith Miné-Hattab
  3. Angela Taddei
  4. Aleksandra M Walczak
  5. Thierry Mora
(2021)
Physical observables to determine the nature of membrane-less cellular sub-compartments
eLife 10:e69181.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69181

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69181

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Deb Sankar Banerjee, Shiladitya Banerjee
    Research Article

    Accurate regulation of centrosome size is essential for ensuring error-free cell division, and dysregulation of centrosome size has been linked to various pathologies, including developmental defects and cancer. While a universally accepted model for centrosome size regulation is lacking, prior theoretical and experimental works suggest a centrosome growth model involving autocatalytic assembly of the pericentriolar material. Here, we show that the autocatalytic assembly model fails to explain the attainment of equal centrosome sizes, which is crucial for error-free cell division. Incorporating latest experimental findings into the molecular mechanisms governing centrosome assembly, we introduce a new quantitative theory for centrosome growth involving catalytic assembly within a shared pool of enzymes. Our model successfully achieves robust size equality between maturing centrosome pairs, mirroring cooperative growth dynamics observed in experiments. To validate our theoretical predictions, we compare them with available experimental data and demonstrate the broad applicability of the catalytic growth model across different organisms, which exhibit distinct growth dynamics and size scaling characteristics.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Marta Urbanska, Yan Ge ... Jochen Guck
    Research Article

    Cell mechanical properties determine many physiological functions, such as cell fate specification, migration, or circulation through vasculature. Identifying factors that govern the mechanical properties is therefore a subject of great interest. Here, we present a mechanomics approach for establishing links between single-cell mechanical phenotype changes and the genes involved in driving them. We combine mechanical characterization of cells across a variety of mouse and human systems with machine learning-based discriminative network analysis of associated transcriptomic profiles to infer a conserved network module of five genes with putative roles in cell mechanics regulation. We validate in silico that the identified gene markers are universal, trustworthy, and specific to the mechanical phenotype across the studied mouse and human systems, and demonstrate experimentally that a selected target, CAV1, changes the mechanical phenotype of cells accordingly when silenced or overexpressed. Our data-driven approach paves the way toward engineering cell mechanical properties on demand to explore their impact on physiological and pathological cell functions.