The mesoscale organization of syntaxin 1A and SNAP25 is determined by SNARE-SNARE-interactions

  1. Jasmin Mertins
  2. Jérôme Finke
  3. Ricarda Antonia Sies
  4. Kerstin Rink
  5. Jan Hasenauer
  6. Thorsten Lang  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Bonn, Germany
  2. Heidelberg University Biochemistry Center, Germany

Abstract

SNARE proteins have been described as the effectors of fusion events in the secretory pathway more than two decades ago. The strong interactions between SNARE-domains are clearly important in membrane fusion, but it is unclear whether they are involved in any other cellular processes. Here, we analyzed two classical SNARE proteins, syntaxin 1A and SNAP25. Although they are supposed to be engaged in tight complexes, we surprisingly find them largely segregated in the plasma membrane. Syntaxin 1A only occupies a small fraction of the plasma membrane area. Yet, we find it is able to redistribute the far more abundant SNAP25 on the mesoscale by gathering crowds of SNAP25 molecules onto syntaxin-clusters in a SNARE-domain dependent manner. Our data suggests that SNARE-domain interactions are not only involved in driving membrane fusion on the nanoscale, but also play an important role in controlling the general organization of proteins on the mesoscale. Further, we propose this mechanisms preserves active syntaxin 1A-SNAP25 complexes at the plasma membrane.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jasmin Mertins

    Department of Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jérôme Finke

    Department of Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ricarda Antonia Sies

    Department of Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kerstin Rink

    Heidelberg University Biochemistry Center, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jan Hasenauer

    Department of Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Thorsten Lang

    Department of Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    For correspondence
    thorsten.lang@uni-bonn.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9128-0137

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Project Number 112927078)

  • Thorsten Lang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Mertins et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,094
    views
  • 199
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jasmin Mertins
  2. Jérôme Finke
  3. Ricarda Antonia Sies
  4. Kerstin Rink
  5. Jan Hasenauer
  6. Thorsten Lang
(2021)
The mesoscale organization of syntaxin 1A and SNAP25 is determined by SNARE-SNARE-interactions
eLife 10:e69236.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69236

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69236

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Conor J Howard, Nathan S Abell ... Nathan B Lubock
    Research Article

    Deep Mutational Scanning (DMS) is an emerging method to systematically test the functional consequences of thousands of sequence changes to a protein target in a single experiment. Because of its utility in interpreting both human variant effects and protein structure-function relationships, it holds substantial promise to improve drug discovery and clinical development. However, applications in this domain require improved experimental and analytical methods. To address this need, we report novel DMS methods to precisely and quantitatively interrogate disease-relevant mechanisms, protein-ligand interactions, and assess predicted response to drug treatment. Using these methods, we performed a DMS of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R), a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) implicated in obesity and an active target of drug development efforts. We assessed the effects of >6600 single amino acid substitutions on MC4R’s function across 18 distinct experimental conditions, resulting in >20 million unique measurements. From this, we identified variants that have unique effects on MC4R-mediated Gαs- and Gαq-signaling pathways, which could be used to design drugs that selectively bias MC4R’s activity. We also identified pathogenic variants that are likely amenable to a corrector therapy. Finally, we functionally characterized structural relationships that distinguish the binding of peptide versus small molecule ligands, which could guide compound optimization. Collectively, these results demonstrate that DMS is a powerful method to empower drug discovery and development.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Meina He, Yongxin Tao ... Wenli Chen
    Research Article

    Copper is an essential enzyme cofactor in bacteria, but excess copper is highly toxic. Bacteria can cope with copper stress by increasing copper resistance and initiating chemorepellent response. However, it remains unclear how bacteria coordinate chemotaxis and resistance to copper. By screening proteins that interacted with the chemotaxis kinase CheA, we identified a copper-binding repressor CsoR that interacted with CheA in Pseudomonas putida. CsoR interacted with the HPT (P1), Dimer (P3), and HATPase_c (P4) domains of CheA and inhibited CheA autophosphorylation, resulting in decreased chemotaxis. The copper-binding of CsoR weakened its interaction with CheA, which relieved the inhibition of chemotaxis by CsoR. In addition, CsoR bound to the promoter of copper-resistance genes to inhibit gene expression, and copper-binding released CsoR from the promoter, leading to increased gene expression and copper resistance. P. putida cells exhibited a chemorepellent response to copper in a CheA-dependent manner, and CsoR inhibited the chemorepellent response to copper. Besides, the CheA-CsoR interaction also existed in proteins from several other bacterial species. Our results revealed a mechanism by which bacteria coordinately regulated chemotaxis and resistance to copper by CsoR.