Mechanical overstimulation causes acute injury and synapse loss followed by fast recovery in lateral-line neuromasts of larval zebrafish

  1. Melanie Holmgren
  2. Michael E Ravicz
  3. Kenneth E Hancock
  4. Olga Strelkova
  5. Dorina Kallogjeri
  6. Artur A Indzhykulian
  7. Mark E Warchol
  8. Lavinia Sheets  Is a corresponding author
  1. Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, United States
  2. Massachusetts Eye and Ear, United States
  3. Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, United States
  4. Harvard Medical School, United States
  5. Washington University School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Excess noise damages sensory hair cells, resulting in loss of synaptic connections with auditory nerves and, in some cases, hair-cell death. The cellular mechanisms underlying mechanically induced hair-cell damage and subsequent repair are not completely understood. Hair cells in neuromasts of larval zebrafish are structurally and functionally comparable to mammalian hair cells but undergo robust regeneration following ototoxic damage. We therefore developed a model for mechanically induced hair-cell damage in this highly tractable system. Free swimming larvae exposed to strong water wave stimulus for 2 hours displayed mechanical injury to neuromasts, including afferent neurite retraction, damaged hair bundles, and reduced mechanotransduction. Synapse loss was observed in apparently intact exposed neuromasts, and this loss was exacerbated by inhibiting glutamate uptake. Mechanical damage also elicited an inflammatory response and macrophage recruitment. Remarkably, neuromast hair-cell morphology and mechanotransduction recovered within hours following exposure, suggesting severely damaged neuromasts undergo repair. Our results indicate functional changes and synapse loss in mechanically damaged lateral-line neuromasts that share key features of damage observed in noise-exposed mammalian ear. Yet, unlike the mammalian ear, mechanical damage to neuromasts is rapidly reversible.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 2, 3, 4 , and 7.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Melanie Holmgren

    Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Michael E Ravicz

    Eaton Peabody Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9978-3444
  3. Kenneth E Hancock

    Eaton Peabody Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Olga Strelkova

    Eaton Peabody Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Dorina Kallogjeri

    Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Artur A Indzhykulian

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Mark E Warchol

    Departments of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Lavinia Sheets

    Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    For correspondence
    sheetsl@wustl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5231-2450

Funding

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC016066)

  • Lavinia Sheets

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC017166)

  • Artur A Indzhykulian

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC006283)

  • Mark E Warchol

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis (protocol no. 20-0158) and in accordance with NIH guidelines for use of zebrafish.

Copyright

© 2021, Holmgren et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,168
    views
  • 169
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Melanie Holmgren
  2. Michael E Ravicz
  3. Kenneth E Hancock
  4. Olga Strelkova
  5. Dorina Kallogjeri
  6. Artur A Indzhykulian
  7. Mark E Warchol
  8. Lavinia Sheets
(2021)
Mechanical overstimulation causes acute injury and synapse loss followed by fast recovery in lateral-line neuromasts of larval zebrafish
eLife 10:e69264.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69264

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69264

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Raven Star Wallace, Bronte Mckeown ... Jonathan Smallwood
    Research Article

    Movie-watching is a central aspect of our lives and an important paradigm for understanding the brain mechanisms behind cognition as it occurs in daily life. Contemporary views of ongoing thought argue that the ability to make sense of events in the ‘here and now’ depend on the neural processing of incoming sensory information by auditory and visual cortex, which are kept in check by systems in association cortex. However, we currently lack an understanding of how patterns of ongoing thoughts map onto the different brain systems when we watch a film, partly because methods of sampling experience disrupt the dynamics of brain activity and the experience of movie-watching. Our study established a novel method for mapping thought patterns onto the brain activity that occurs at different moments of a film, which does not disrupt the time course of brain activity or the movie-watching experience. We found moments when experience sampling highlighted engagement with multi-sensory features of the film or highlighted thoughts with episodic features, regions of sensory cortex were more active and subsequent memory for events in the movie was better—on the other hand, periods of intrusive distraction emerged when activity in regions of association cortex within the frontoparietal system was reduced. These results highlight the critical role sensory systems play in the multi-modal experience of movie-watching and provide evidence for the role of association cortex in reducing distraction when we watch films.

    1. Neuroscience
    Mi-Seon Kong, Ethan Ancell ... Larry S Zweifel
    Research Article

    The central amygdala (CeA) has emerged as an important brain region for regulating both negative (fear and anxiety) and positive (reward) affective behaviors. The CeA has been proposed to encode affective information in the form of valence (whether the stimulus is good or bad) or salience (how significant is the stimulus), but the extent to which these two types of stimulus representation occur in the CeA is not known. Here, we used single cell calcium imaging in mice during appetitive and aversive conditioning and found that majority of CeA neurons (~65%) encode the valence of the unconditioned stimulus (US) with a smaller subset of cells (~15%) encoding the salience of the US. Valence and salience encoding of the conditioned stimulus (CS) was also observed, albeit to a lesser extent. These findings show that the CeA is a site of convergence for encoding oppositely valenced US information.