Pseudohypoxic HIF pathway activation dysregulates collagen structure-function in human lung fibrosis

  1. Christopher J Brereton
  2. Liudi Yao
  3. Elizabeth R Davies
  4. Yilu Zhou
  5. Milica Vukmirovic
  6. Joseph A Bell
  7. Siyuan Wang
  8. Robert A Ridley
  9. Lareb SN Dean
  10. Orestis G Andriotis
  11. Franco Conforti
  12. Lennart Brewitz
  13. Soran Mohammed
  14. Timothy Wallis
  15. Ali Tavassoli
  16. Rob M Ewing
  17. Aiman Alzetani
  18. Benjamin G Marshall
  19. Sophie V Fletcher
  20. Philipp J Thurner
  21. Aurelie Fabre
  22. Naftali Kaminski
  23. Luca Richeldi
  24. Atul Bhaskar
  25. Christopher J Schofield
  26. Matthew Loxham
  27. Donna E Davies
  28. Yihua Wang  Is a corresponding author
  29. Mark G Jones  Is a corresponding author
  1. Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
  2. NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, United Kingdom
  3. Biological Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
  4. Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
  5. Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, United States
  6. Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Canada
  7. Institute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, Austria
  8. Department of Chemistry and the Ineos Oxford Institute for Antimicrobial Research, Chemistry Research Laboratory, United Kingdom
  9. School of Chemistry, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
  10. University Hospital Southampton, United Kingdom
  11. Department of Histopathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital & UCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland
  12. Unità Operativa Complessa di Pneumologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Italy
  13. Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
9 figures, 1 table and 6 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
The collagen cross-linking enzymes PLOD2 and LOXL2 are co-expressed at sites of active fibrogenesis in IPF.

(A–F) Expression of LOX, LOXL1, LOXL2, LOXL3, LOXL4, and PLOD2 in healthy alveolar septae, IPF alveolar septae and IPF fibroblast foci (n = 10 individual healthy and IPF donors). Relative expression levels are calculated as Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (FPKM). Bars represent standard geometric means. **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001 by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. (G) Scatterplot of paired fibroblast foci data from (C) and (F) were plotted to compare expression of PLOD2 and LOXL2 (Spearman rank correlation coefficient r = 0.63, p = 0.04). (H) Representative image of mRNA expression of PLOD2 (red chromagen) and LOXL2 (green chromagen) in IPF lung tissue (n = 7 donors) using RNAscope RNA in-situ hybridisation. A fibroblastic focus is identified by * and arrows identify co-expression pattern. Left scale bar 100 μm, right scale bar 20 μm.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Correlation of PLOD2 with LOXL family members.

(A–D) Scatterplots of paired data from (Figure 1A, B, D-F) comparing gene expression within fibroblast foci (n = 10 donors) of PLOD2 with LOX, LOXL1, LOXL3, and LOXL4. (E) Scatterplot comparing gene expression within fibroblast foci (n = 10 donors) of LOXL2 and COL1A1 expression. Relative expression levels are calculated as Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (FPKM). Strength of correlation calculated using Spearman correlation coefficient. (F and G) Representative image of mRNA expression of PLOD2 (red chromagen) and LOXL2 (green chromagen) in IPF lung tissue (n = 7 donors) using RNAscope RNA in-situ hybridisation. (H) Serial sections of IPF lung tissue were stained for PLOD2 (red chromagen) and LOXL2 (green chromagen) using RNAscope RNA in-situ hybridisation (top panel), with Masson’s trichrome stain (middle panel, collagen shown in blue) or H/E (bottom panel). Scale bars in (F–H) are 100 μm with inserts 20 μm.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Hypoxia mimetics strongly promote PLOD2 and LOXL2 expression in lung fibroblasts.

(A–B, D) Relative gene expression using the ΔΔCt method of PLOD2, LOXL2, and COL1A1 in healthy lung fibroblasts over a 72-hr time course in the presence of EGF, TGFβ1, the hypoxia mimetic DMOG, Wnt3a, Wnt5a, or vehicle control. n = 3 independent experiments. Bars indicate geometric means. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. (C) PLOD2 and LOXL2 protein levels at 72 hr. β-actin loading control. The full blots are shown in Figure 2—source data 1. (E) Representative immunofluorescence images of healthy lung fibroblasts with indicated treatment stained for LOXL2 (red), PLOD2 (green), and DAPI (blue). Scale bar 50 μm.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Pro-fibrotic signalling pathways in human lung fibroblasts.

(A–C) Healthy lung fibroblasts exposed to control, EGF, TGFβ1, DMOG, Wnt3α or Wnt5α signalling for 24, 48, or 72 hr. n = 3 independent experiments. (A) Protein expression of phospho-ERK, phospho-SMAD2/3, HIF1α, and active β-catenin at 24 hr of exposure to conditions. β-actin was used as a loading control. The full blots are shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. (B) LOXL2 and PLOD2 protein levels at 24, 48, or 72 hr of exposure to conditions. β-actin was used as a loading control. The full blots are shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. (C) Expression of COL3A1 in healthy lung fibroblasts exposed to conditions for 24, 48, or 72 hr using the ΔΔCt method. Bars indicate geometric means. ****p < 0.0001 by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. (D) Protein expression of HIF1α, LOXL2, and PLOD2 in IPF fibroblasts exposed to control media or IOX2 for 24, 48, or 72 hr. β-actin was used as a loading control. The full blots are shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. (E) Fold change in mRNA levels of LOXL2, PLOD2 and the HIF pathway activation marker gene carbonic anhydrase IX/9 (CA9) in MRC5 fibroblasts after incubation in nomoxia (21% O2) or hypoxia (1% O2) for 24 hr. β-actin-normalised mRNA levels under nomoxia were used to set the baseline value at unity. Data are mean  ±  s.d. n  =  3 samples per group. ****p < 0.0001 using unpaired t test.

HIF pathway activation regulates PLOD2 and LOXL2 expression in lung fibroblasts from patients with IPF.

(A) Fold changes in mRNA levels of HIF1α (HIF1A), HIF2α (EPAS1), and HIF1β (ARNT) in primary human lung fibroblasts from patients with IPF transfected with indicated siRNA followed by treatment with DMOG. β-actin-normalised mRNA levels in control cells were used to set the baseline value at unity. Data are mean  ±  s.d. n  =  3 samples per group. (B, C) Fold change in mRNA levels of LOXL2 (B) and PLOD2 (C) in IPF fibroblasts transfected with indicated siRNA followed by treatment with DMOG or vehicle control. β-actin-normalised mRNA levels in control cells were used to set the baseline value at unity. Data are mean  ±  s.d. n  =  3 samples per group. ns (not significant, p > 0.05); *p < 0.05; ****p < 0.0001 by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. (D) PLOD2, LOXL2 and HIF1α and β-tubulin protein levels in IPF fibroblasts transfected with indicated siRNA followed by treatment of DMSO or DMOG. β-tubulin was used as a loading control. The full blots are shown in Figure 3—source data 1.

Figure 4 with 2 supplements
HIF pathway activation promotes PLOD2 and LOXL2 gene expression relative to fibrillar collagen expression.

Lung fibroblasts from IPF donors (n = 3 across two independent experiments) were cultured in the presence or absence TGFβ1, DMOG, combined TGFβ1 and DMOG, or vehicle control for 48 hr. (A, B) Relative gene expression of PLOD2 (A) and LOXL2 (B) using the ΔΔCt method. Bars indicate geometric means. Data are mean  ±  s.d. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. (C) PLOD2 and LOXL2 protein levels. β-actin was used as a loading control. (D) Protein expression of LOXL2 in conditioned media. Ponceau S staining showing total protein levels. The full blots are shown in Figure 4—source data 1. Bars in graph indicate geometric means. Data are mean  ±  s.d. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. (E, F) Expression of PLOD2 and LOXL2 from (A and B) was divided by COL1A1 expression (shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 2) to calculate proportionate expression changes of cross-linking enzymes relative to collagen fibrillogenesis gene expression. Bars indicate geometric mean. Grouped analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
HIF stabilisation increases LOXL2 secretion in control fibroblasts.

Levels of LOXL2 protein in conditioned media from control fibroblasts with the indicated treatment. Ponceau S staining showing total protein levels. The full blots are shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2
TGFβ1 promotes interstitial collagen gene expression in lung fibroblasts.

Relative gene expression of COL1A1 in lung fibroblasts from IPF donors (n = 3) exposed to 48 hr of control media, TGFβ1, DMOG or combined TGFβ1 and DMOG conditions using the ΔΔCt method. Bars indicate geometric means. *p < 0.05 by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement
HIF pathway activation promotes pyridinoline cross-linking, alters collagen nano-architecture, and increases tissue stiffness.

Lung fibroblasts from IPF patients (n = 3 donors, two experiments per donor) were used in the 3D model of fibrosis in the presence of IOX2 or vehicle control. Bars indicate geometric mean + s.e.m. Analysis was performed using a Mann-Whitney t-test (two-tailed) **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. (A) Total mature trivalent (PYD+ DPD) collagen cross-links determined by ELISA. n = 6 samples from three IPF donors. (B) Tissue stiffness measured from parallel-plate compression testing (n = 12 samples from three IPF donors) determined by Young’s modulus and represented as proportion of control. (C) Representative images of histological sections of samples stained with picrosirius red and imaged under polarised light. Scale bar 20 μm. (D) Representative electron microscopy images of collagen fibrils within the 3D model of fibrosis. Scale bar 50 nm. (E) Collagen fibril diameter within the 3D model of fibrosis measured in transverse section (300 fibrils for each condition from two IPF donors, measured by a blinded investigator). (F) Atomic force microscopy indentation modulus of collagen fibrils (3–7 fibrils per donor) from control (n = 42 fibrils from eight donors) or IPF lung tissue (n = 57 fibrils from 10 donors) under non-hydrated conditions; each data point represents the mean of 30–50 force-displacement curves per fibril.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
IOX2-mediated HIF pathway activation promotes PLOD2 and LOXL2 expression in the 3D in vitro model of fibrosis.

Lung fibroblasts from IPF patients were used in the 3D model of fibrosis in the presence of IOX2 or vehicle control as indicated. Protein expression of (A) HIF1α, PLOD2, and (B) LOXL2 following 2 weeks of culture in the presence or absence of TGFβ1 with or without IOX2 (50 μM or 250 μM) or vehicle control. β-actin loading control. Blots representative of experiments from two separate IPF donors. The full blots are shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1.

Figure 6 with 1 supplement
Pseudohypoxia and loss of FIH activity promotes HIF pathway signalling in IPF fibroblasts and increases tissue stiffness.

(A) HIF GSVA scores calculated in human lung fibroblasts derived from control or patients with interstitial lung disease (scleroderma lung or a usual interstitial pneumonia / IPF pattern) (GSE40839). Data are mean  ±  s.d. ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. (B) HIF GSVA scores calculated in human bronchoalveolar lavage derived mesenchymal stromal cells from patients with stable and progressive IPF (GSE73854). Data are mean  ±  s.d. *p < 0.05 by the unpaired t test. (C) PLOD2, LOXL2, HIF1β, FIH, and β-tubulin protein levels in lung fibroblasts from patients with IPF transfected with indicated siRNA. β-tubulin was used as a loading control. The full blots are shown in Figure 6—source data 1. (D) Diagram explaining the HIF1α CAD reporter assay in E and F. In brief, the FIH asparaginyl hydroxylase hydroxylates HIF1α CAD, inhibiting its binding with CBP/p300 and decreasing luciferase activity. When FIH is inhibited, the non-hydroxylated HIF1α CAD can bind with CBP/p300 increasing luciferase activity. (E) HIF1α CAD reporter assays in normal human lung fibroblasts (control fibroblasts) or IPF lung fibroblasts (IPF fibroblasts). Values represent the relative fold increase of firefly luciferase in relation to Renilla luciferase, normalised against control (1.0). Data are mean  ±  s.d. n  =  3 samples per group. **p <  0.01 by unpaired t test. (F) HIF1α CAD reporter assays in control fibroblasts with indicated treatment (hydrogen peroxide (T-hydro), DMOG, or vehicle control). Values represent relative fold of firefly luciferase in relation to Renilla luciferase, normalised against control (1.0). Data are mean  ±  s.d. n  =  3 samples per group. (G and H) Control lung fibroblasts (n = 3 donors, two experiments per donor) were used in the 3D model of fibrosis in the presence of IOX2 and/or DM-NOFD or vehicle control as indicated. (G) Total mature trivalent (PYD+ DPD) collagen cross-links determined by ELISA. n = 6 samples from three donors. (H) Tissue stiffness measured from parallel-plate compression testing (n = 6 samples from three donors) determined by Young’s modulus and represented as proportion of control. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1
Pseudohypoxia and loss of FIH activity promotes HIF pathway signalling and increases LOXL2 and PLOD2 expression.

Control lung fibroblasts (n = 3 donors, two experiments per donor) were used in the 3D model of fibrosis in the presence of IOX2 and/or DM-NOFD or vehicle control as indicated. Fold change in mRNA levels of CA9 (A), LOXL2 (B) and PLOD2 (C) in the 3D model of fibrosis with indicated treatment. Bars indicate geometric means. Data are mean  ±  s.d. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.

Figure 7 with 1 supplement
HIF pathway activation localises in areas of active fibrogenesis to cells co-expressing LOXL2 and PLOD2.

(A–B) Scatterplots showing correlations between LOXL2/PLOD2 expression and HIF scores (A) or TGFβ scores (B) in IPF fibroblast foci (n = 10) using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. (C) Representative images of serial sections of lung tissue from patients with IPF (n = 3). mRNA expression of PLOD2 (red chromagen) and LOXL2 (green chromagen) using RNAscope RNA in-situ hybridisation with immunohistochemical staining for Carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-IX) and HIF1α using DAB (brown). A fibroblastic focus is identified by *. Scale bar 20 μm.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1
HIF pathway activation localises in areas of active fibrogenesis to cells co-expressing LOXL2 and PLOD2.

Representative images of serial sections of lung tissue from patients with IPF (n = 3). mRNA expression of PLOD2 (red chromagen) and LOXL2 (green chromagen) using RNAscope RNA in-situ hybridisation with immunohistochemical staining for Carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-IX) and HIF1α using DAB (brown). Scale bars are 100 μm with inserts 20 μm.

Figure 8 with 1 supplement
Gene set variance analysis of single-cell RNAseq fibroblast populations identifies co-enrichment of HIF score and oxidative stress genes.

(A) HIF score GSVA in control and IPF fibroblasts sequenced by single-cell RNAseq (GSE135893). Colours correspond to calculated GSVA score for each cell. (B) Plot of mean HIF GSVA scores for each fibroblast type in control and IPF fibroblast cell populations and compared using Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, ****p < 0.0001. (C) GSVA scores for genes upregulated in IPF in this dataset associated with the Gene Set: HALLMARK_REACTIVE_OXYGEN_SPECIES_PATHWAY (M5938). (D) Plot of upregulated oxidative stress GSVA scores for each fibroblast type in control and IPF cells. (E) Correlation plot of HIF score vs upregulated oxidative stress GSVA score for single cell RNAseq data. Correlation coefficient is Pearson’s product-moment coefficient.

Figure 8—figure supplement 1
Fibroblast populations identified within a single-cell RNA sequencing dataset.

(A) t-stochastic nearest neighbour embedding (t-SNE) of single cell sequencing data (GSE135893) showing clustering of different lung fibroblast types. (B) t-SNE plot of single cell fibroblast data showing diagnosis of the patients of origin for each fibroblast.

Author response image 1

Tables

Appendix 1—key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or
reference
IdentifiersAdditional information
transfected construct (human)GAL4DBD-HIF1αCAD (residues 652–826)
for
HIF1α CAD reporter assay
Ratcliffe lab (University of
Oxford) Coleman et al., 2007
transfected construct (Homo-sapiens)UAS-luc reporter
for
HIF1α CAD reporter assay
Ratcliffe lab (University of
Oxford) Coleman et al., 2007
transfected construct (Homo-sapiens)Plasmid for Dual-Luciferase Reporter AssayPromegaphRL-CMV
transfected construct (Homo-sapiens)siRNA to human HIF1AN (FIH)Dharmacon/
Thermo Fisher Scientific
MU-004073-02-0002
transfected construct (Homo-sapiens)siRNA to human
HIF1A (HIF1α)
Dharmacon/
Thermo Fisher Scientific
MU-00401805-05-0002
transfected construct (Homo-sapiens)siRNA to human EPAS1(HIF2α)Dharmacon/
Thermo Fisher Scientific
MU-004814-01-0002
transfected construct (Homo-sapiens)siRNA to
human ARNT
(HIF1β)
Dharmacon/
Thermo Fisher Scientific
MU-007207-01-0002
transfected construct (Homo-sapiens)siGENOME
RISC-Free
Dharmacon/
Thermo Fisher Scientific
D-001220-01-05
AntibodyAnti-CAIX
(Rabbit
polyclonal)
Novus BiologicalsCat. #: NB100-417IHC 1:500
AntibodyAnti-HIF1A
(Rabbit polyclonal)
Cayman ChemicalCat. #: 10006421IHC 1:500
antibodyanti-human
HIF1α (Mouse
polyclonal IgG1k)
BD BiosciencesCat #:610,958WB (1:1000)
antibodyAnti-HIF1β
(Rabbit polyclonal)
Cell Signaling TechnologyCat #:5,537WB (1:1000)
antibodyAnti-phospho-
Smad2 (Rabbit polyclonal)
Cell Signaling TechnologyCat #: 3,104WB (1:1000)
antibodyanti-β-tubulin
(Mouse polyclonal)
Cell Signaling TechnologyCat #: 86,298WB (1:1000)
antibodyanti-PLOD2
(Mouse
monoclonal
IgG2B)
R&D SystemsCat #: MAB4445WB (1:500)
antibodyAnti- human
LOXL2 (Goat polyclonal)
R&D SystemsCat #: AF2639WB (1:1000)IF (1:100)
antibodyanti-human FIH
(Mouse monoclonal 162 C)
Ratcliffe lab (University of
Oxford) Stolze et al., 2004
WB (1:200)
AntibodyAnti-P-ERK
(polyclonal rabbit Thr202/Tyr204)
Cell Signalling TechnologyCat #: 9,101WB (1:1000)
AntibodyAnti-P-SMAD2/3
(Rabbit polyclonal Ser465/467)
Cell Signalling TechnologyCat #: 8,828WB (1:1000)
AntibodyIRDye 800CW
Donkey anti-Goat
IgG Secondary
Antibody
LI-COR
Biosciences
Cat #: 926–32214WB (1:5000)
AntibodyIRDye 800CW Goat anti-Rabbit IgG Secondary
Antibody
LI-COR
Biosciences
Cat #: 926–32211WB (1:5000)
AntibodyIRDye 680LT Goat
anti-Mouse IgG Secondary
Antibody
LI-COR
Biosciences
Cat #: 926–68020WB (1:5000)
AntibodyAnti-non-phospho (active) β-catenin (Rabbit
monoclonal IgG)
Cell Signalling TechnologyCat. #: 8,814 SWB (1:1000)
AntibodyAnti-mouse IgG
HRP-linked
whole antibody
Life SciencesCat. #: NXA931WB (1:1000)
AntibodyAnti-goat Immunoglobulins/
HRP (affinity
isolated)
DakoCat. #: P0449WB (1:1000)
AntibodyAnti-goat IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor 647)AbcamCat. #: Ab150131ICC 1:100
sequence-based reagentHuman HIF1A (HIF1α)QiagenQuantiTect PCR
primersCat #: QT00083664
sequence-based reagentHuman EPAS1 (HIF2α)QiagenQuantiTect PCR
primersCat #: QT00069587
sequence-based reagentHuman ARNT (HIF1β)QiagenQuantiTect PCR
primersCat #: QT00023177
sequence-based reagentHuman ACTB(β-actin)QiagenQuantiTect PCR
primersCat #: QT01680476
Sequence-based reagentLOXL2Primer Design
Sequence-based reagentPLOD2Primer Design
Sequence-based reagentCOL1A1Primer Design
Sequence-based reagentCOL3A1Primer Design
Peptide,
recombinant
protein
Recombinant
Human TGF-
beta 1 Protein
R&D SystemsCat. #: 240-B-010
Peptide,
recombinant
protein
Recombinant
Human EGF
GMP Protein
R&D SystemsCat. #: 236-GMP-200
Commercial
assay or kit
RNAscope 2.5
HD Duplex Assay
Advanced Cell DiagnosticsCat. #: 322,430
Commercial
assay or kit
RNAscope probe-
Hs-LOXL2-C1
Advanced Cell DiagnosticsCat. #: 311,341
Commercial
assay or kit
RNAscope probe-
Hs-PLOD2-C2
Advanced Cell DiagnosticsCat. #: 547761-C2
Commercial
assay or kit
MicroVue Bone
PYD EIA
QuidelCat. #: 8,010
Commercial
assay or kit
Hydroxyproline
Assay Kit
MerckCat. #: MAK008
Commercial
assay or kit
Total Protein
Assay
QuickZyme BiosciencesCat. #: QZBtotprot
Commercial assay or kitPicro Sirius Red
Stain Kit
(Connective
Tissue Stain)
AbcamCat. #: Ab150681
commercial assay or kitLipofectamine 3,000Thermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: L3000008
commercial assay or kitLipofectamine RNAiMAXThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: 13778–075
commercial assay or kitDual-Luciferase Reporter Assay
System
PromegaCat. #: E1910
commercial assay or kitQuantiNova SYBR Green RT-PCR kitsQiagenCat. #: 208052
chemical compound, drugDimethyloxaloylglycine (DMOG)Sigma AldrichCat #: D3695CAS: 89464-63-1
chemical compound, drugN-[[1,2-Dihydro-4-hydroxy-2-oxo-1-(phenylmethyl)–3-quinolinyl]carbonyl]-glycine (IOX2)Selleck ChemicalsCat #: S2919CAS: 931398-72-0
chemical compound, drugDimethyl N-oxalyl-D-phenylalanine (DM-NOFD)Schofield lab (University of Oxford) McDonough et al., 2005
chemical compound, drugDMSOSigma AldrichCat #: 276,855CAS: 67-68-5
chemical compound, drugT-hydro (tert-butyl hydroperoxide)Sigma AldrichCat #: 19,999CAS: 75-91-220 µM (fresh prepared)

Additional files

Supplementary file 1

Semiquantitative analysis of mRNA expression & Fibroblast demographic details.

(a) Semiquantitative analysis of LOX2 and PLOD2 mRNA expression identified by RNAscope in situ hybridization in cell subtypes in IPF lung tissue (n = 7 donors). FF, fibroblast focus. (b) Fibroblast donor demographic details.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69348/elife-69348-supp1-v1.docx
Supplementary file 2

Short interfering RNA (siRNA) oligo sequences.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69348/elife-69348-supp2-v1.docx
Transparent reporting form
https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69348/elife-69348-transrepform1-v1.pdf
Source code 1

Source code for RNAseq analyses for Figure 6a, b.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69348/elife-69348-code1-v1.zip
Source code 2

Source code for RNAseq analyses for Figure 7a, b.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69348/elife-69348-code2-v1.zip
Source code 3

Source code for RNAseq analyses for Figure 8 and Figure 8—figure supplement 1.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69348/elife-69348-code3-v1.zip

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Christopher J Brereton
  2. Liudi Yao
  3. Elizabeth R Davies
  4. Yilu Zhou
  5. Milica Vukmirovic
  6. Joseph A Bell
  7. Siyuan Wang
  8. Robert A Ridley
  9. Lareb SN Dean
  10. Orestis G Andriotis
  11. Franco Conforti
  12. Lennart Brewitz
  13. Soran Mohammed
  14. Timothy Wallis
  15. Ali Tavassoli
  16. Rob M Ewing
  17. Aiman Alzetani
  18. Benjamin G Marshall
  19. Sophie V Fletcher
  20. Philipp J Thurner
  21. Aurelie Fabre
  22. Naftali Kaminski
  23. Luca Richeldi
  24. Atul Bhaskar
  25. Christopher J Schofield
  26. Matthew Loxham
  27. Donna E Davies
  28. Yihua Wang
  29. Mark G Jones
(2022)
Pseudohypoxic HIF pathway activation dysregulates collagen structure-function in human lung fibrosis
eLife 11:e69348.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69348