Engineering paralog-specific PSD-95 recombinant binders as minimally interfering multimodal probes for advanced imaging techniques

  1. Charlotte Rimbault
  2. Christelle Breillat
  3. Benjamin Compans
  4. Estelle Toulmé
  5. Filipe Nunes Vicente
  6. Monica Fernandez-Monreal
  7. Patrice Mascalchi
  8. Camille Genuer
  9. Virginia Puente-Muñoz
  10. Isabel Gauthereau
  11. Eric Hosy
  12. Stéphane Claverol
  13. Gregory Giannone
  14. Ingrid Chamma
  15. Cameron D Mackereth
  16. Christel Poujol
  17. Daniel Choquet
  18. Matthieu Sainlos  Is a corresponding author
  1. Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, France
  2. Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, UMS 3420, France
  3. University of Bordeaux, France
  4. Univ Bordeaux, Inserm U1212, CNRS, UMR 5320, France
  5. CNRS UMR 5297 University of Bordeaux, France

Abstract

Despite the constant advances in fluorescence imaging techniques, monitoring endogenous proteins still constitutes a major challenge in particular when considering dynamics studies or super-resolution imaging. We have recently evolved specific protein-based binders for PSD-95, the main postsynaptic scaffold proteins at excitatory synapses. Since the synthetic recombinant binders recognize epitopes not directly involved in the target protein activity, we consider them here as tools to develop endogenous PSD-95 imaging probes. After confirming their lack of impact on PSD-95 function, we validated their use as intrabody fluorescent probes. We further engineered the probes and demonstrated their usefulness in different super-resolution imaging modalities (STED, PALM and DNA-PAINT) in both live and fixed neurons. Finally, we exploited the binders to enrich at the synapse genetically encoded calcium reporters. Overall, we demonstrate that these evolved binders constitute a robust and efficient platform to selectively target and monitor endogenous PSD-95 using various fluorescence imaging techniques.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Charlotte Rimbault

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4760-8430
  2. Christelle Breillat

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Benjamin Compans

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7823-1499
  4. Estelle Toulmé

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Filipe Nunes Vicente

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Monica Fernandez-Monreal

    Bordeaux Imaging Center, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, UMS 3420, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7278-448X
  7. Patrice Mascalchi

    Bordeaux Imaging Center, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, UMS 3420, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Camille Genuer

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Virginia Puente-Muñoz

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Isabel Gauthereau

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Eric Hosy

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2479-5915
  12. Stéphane Claverol

    Bordeaux Proteome, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Gregory Giannone

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Ingrid Chamma

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Cameron D Mackereth

    Univ Bordeaux, Inserm U1212, CNRS, UMR 5320, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Christel Poujol

    Bordeaux Imaging Center, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, UMS 3420, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Daniel Choquet

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4726-9763
  18. Matthieu Sainlos

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, CNRS UMR 5297 University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    For correspondence
    sainlos@u-bordeaux.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5465-5641

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-13-BS07-0019- 01)

  • Christel Poujol
  • Matthieu Sainlos

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CE16-0026)

  • Christel Poujol
  • Matthieu Sainlos

European Research Council (Dyn-Syn-Mem 787340)

  • Daniel Choquet

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Melike Lakadamyali, University of Pennsylvania, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the European Communities Council (Directive 2010/63/EU of September 22, 2010) and were approved by the Animal Experimental Committee of Bordeaux (CE50)

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: April 8, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: May 4, 2021
  3. Accepted: December 4, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: January 3, 2024 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: January 19, 2024 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2024, Rimbault et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,600
    views
  • 303
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Charlotte Rimbault
  2. Christelle Breillat
  3. Benjamin Compans
  4. Estelle Toulmé
  5. Filipe Nunes Vicente
  6. Monica Fernandez-Monreal
  7. Patrice Mascalchi
  8. Camille Genuer
  9. Virginia Puente-Muñoz
  10. Isabel Gauthereau
  11. Eric Hosy
  12. Stéphane Claverol
  13. Gregory Giannone
  14. Ingrid Chamma
  15. Cameron D Mackereth
  16. Christel Poujol
  17. Daniel Choquet
  18. Matthieu Sainlos
(2024)
Engineering paralog-specific PSD-95 recombinant binders as minimally interfering multimodal probes for advanced imaging techniques
eLife 13:e69620.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69620

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69620

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Richard Sejour, Janet Leatherwood ... Bruce Futcher
    Research Article

    Previously, Tuller et al. found that the first 30–50 codons of the genes of yeast and other eukaryotes are slightly enriched for rare codons. They argued that this slowed translation, and was adaptive because it queued ribosomes to prevent collisions. Today, the translational speeds of different codons are known, and indeed rare codons are translated slowly. We re-examined this 5’ slow translation ‘ramp.’ We confirm that 5’ regions are slightly enriched for rare codons; in addition, they are depleted for downstream Start codons (which are fast), with both effects contributing to slow 5’ translation. However, we also find that the 5’ (and 3’) ends of yeast genes are poorly conserved in evolution, suggesting that they are unstable and turnover relatively rapidly. When a new 5’ end forms de novo, it is likely to include codons that would otherwise be rare. Because evolution has had a relatively short time to select against these codons, 5’ ends are typically slightly enriched for rare, slow codons. Opposite to the expectation of Tuller et al., we show by direct experiment that genes with slowly translated codons at the 5’ end are expressed relatively poorly, and that substituting faster synonymous codons improves expression. Direct experiment shows that slow codons do not prevent downstream ribosome collisions. Further informatic studies suggest that for natural genes, slow 5’ ends are correlated with poor gene expression, opposite to the expectation of Tuller et al. Thus, we conclude that slow 5’ translation is a ‘spandrel’--a non-adaptive consequence of something else, in this case, the turnover of 5’ ends in evolution, and it does not improve translation.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Boglarka Zambo, Evelina Edelweiss ... Gergo Gogl
    Research Article

    Truncation of the protein-protein interaction SH3 domain of the membrane remodeling Bridging Integrator 1 (BIN1, Amphiphysin 2) protein leads to centronuclear myopathy. Here, we assessed the impact of a set of naturally observed, previously uncharacterized BIN1 SH3 domain variants using conventional in vitro and cell-based assays monitoring the BIN1 interaction with dynamin 2 (DNM2) and identified potentially harmful ones that can be also tentatively connected to neuromuscular disorders. However, SH3 domains are typically promiscuous and it is expected that other, so far unknown partners of BIN1 exist besides DNM2, that also participate in the development of centronuclear myopathy. In order to shed light on these other relevant interaction partners and to get a holistic picture of the pathomechanism behind BIN1 SH3 domain variants, we used affinity interactomics. We identified hundreds of new BIN1 interaction partners proteome-wide, among which many appear to participate in cell division, suggesting a critical role of BIN1 in the regulation of mitosis. Finally, we show that the identified BIN1 mutations indeed cause proteome-wide affinity perturbation, signifying the importance of employing unbiased affinity interactomic approaches.