Engineering paralog-specific PSD-95 recombinant binders as minimally interfering multimodal probes for advanced imaging techniques

  1. Charlotte Rimbault
  2. Christelle Breillat
  3. Benjamin Compans
  4. Estelle Toulmé
  5. Filipe Nunes Vicente
  6. Monica Fernandez-Monreal
  7. Patrice Mascalchi
  8. Camille Genuer
  9. Virginia Puente-Muñoz
  10. Isabel Gauthereau
  11. Eric Hosy
  12. Stéphane Claverol
  13. Gregory Giannone
  14. Ingrid Chamma
  15. Cameron D Mackereth
  16. Christel Poujol
  17. Daniel Choquet
  18. Matthieu Sainlos  Is a corresponding author
  1. Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, France
  2. Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, UMS 3420, France
  3. University of Bordeaux, France
  4. Univ Bordeaux, Inserm U1212, CNRS, UMR 5320, France
  5. CNRS UMR 5297 University of Bordeaux, France

Abstract

Despite the constant advances in fluorescence imaging techniques, monitoring endogenous proteins still constitutes a major challenge in particular when considering dynamics studies or super-resolution imaging. We have recently evolved specific protein-based binders for PSD-95, the main postsynaptic scaffold proteins at excitatory synapses. Since the synthetic recombinant binders recognize epitopes not directly involved in the target protein activity, we consider them here as tools to develop endogenous PSD-95 imaging probes. After confirming their lack of impact on PSD-95 function, we validated their use as intrabody fluorescent probes. We further engineered the probes and demonstrated their usefulness in different super-resolution imaging modalities (STED, PALM and DNA-PAINT) in both live and fixed neurons. Finally, we exploited the binders to enrich at the synapse genetically encoded calcium reporters. Overall, we demonstrate that these evolved binders constitute a robust and efficient platform to selectively target and monitor endogenous PSD-95 using various fluorescence imaging techniques.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Charlotte Rimbault

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4760-8430
  2. Christelle Breillat

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Benjamin Compans

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7823-1499
  4. Estelle Toulmé

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Filipe Nunes Vicente

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Monica Fernandez-Monreal

    Bordeaux Imaging Center, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, UMS 3420, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7278-448X
  7. Patrice Mascalchi

    Bordeaux Imaging Center, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, UMS 3420, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Camille Genuer

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Virginia Puente-Muñoz

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Isabel Gauthereau

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Eric Hosy

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2479-5915
  12. Stéphane Claverol

    Bordeaux Proteome, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Gregory Giannone

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Ingrid Chamma

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Cameron D Mackereth

    Univ Bordeaux, Inserm U1212, CNRS, UMR 5320, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Christel Poujol

    Bordeaux Imaging Center, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, UMS 3420, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Daniel Choquet

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4726-9763
  18. Matthieu Sainlos

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, CNRS UMR 5297 University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    For correspondence
    sainlos@u-bordeaux.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5465-5641

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-13-BS07-0019- 01)

  • Christel Poujol
  • Matthieu Sainlos

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CE16-0026)

  • Christel Poujol
  • Matthieu Sainlos

European Research Council (Dyn-Syn-Mem 787340)

  • Daniel Choquet

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the European Communities Council (Directive 2010/63/EU of September 22, 2010) and were approved by the Animal Experimental Committee of Bordeaux (CE50)

Copyright

© 2024, Rimbault et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,928
    views
  • 342
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Charlotte Rimbault
  2. Christelle Breillat
  3. Benjamin Compans
  4. Estelle Toulmé
  5. Filipe Nunes Vicente
  6. Monica Fernandez-Monreal
  7. Patrice Mascalchi
  8. Camille Genuer
  9. Virginia Puente-Muñoz
  10. Isabel Gauthereau
  11. Eric Hosy
  12. Stéphane Claverol
  13. Gregory Giannone
  14. Ingrid Chamma
  15. Cameron D Mackereth
  16. Christel Poujol
  17. Daniel Choquet
  18. Matthieu Sainlos
(2024)
Engineering paralog-specific PSD-95 recombinant binders as minimally interfering multimodal probes for advanced imaging techniques
eLife 13:e69620.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69620

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69620

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Senem Ntourmas, Martin Sachs ... Dominic B Bernkopf
    Research Article

    Activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway crucially depends on the polymerization of dishevelled 2 (DVL2) into biomolecular condensates. However, given the low affinity of known DVL2 self-interaction sites and its low cellular concentration, it is unclear how polymers can form. Here, we detect oligomeric DVL2 complexes at endogenous protein levels in human cell lines, using a biochemical ultracentrifugation assay. We identify a low-complexity region (LCR4) in the C-terminus whose deletion and fusion decreased and increased the complexes, respectively. Notably, LCR4-induced complexes correlated with the formation of microscopically visible multimeric condensates. Adjacent to LCR4, we mapped a conserved domain (CD2) promoting condensates only. Molecularly, LCR4 and CD2 mediated DVL2 self-interaction via aggregating residues and phenylalanine stickers, respectively. Point mutations inactivating these interaction sites impaired Wnt pathway activation by DVL2. Our study discovers DVL2 complexes with functional importance for Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Moreover, we provide evidence that DVL2 condensates form in two steps by pre-oligomerization via high-affinity interaction sites, such as LCR4, and subsequent condensation via low-affinity interaction sites, such as CD2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Bikash Adhikari, Katharina Schneider ... Elmar Wolf
    Research Article

    The development of proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), which induce the degradation of target proteins by bringing them into proximity with cellular E3 ubiquitin ligases, has revolutionized drug development. While the human genome encodes more than 600 different E3 ligases, current PROTACs use only a handful of them, drastically limiting their full potential. Furthermore, many PROTAC development campaigns fail because the selected E3 ligase candidates are unable to induce degradation of the particular target of interest. As more and more ligands for novel E3 ligases are discovered, the chemical effort to identify the best E3 ligase for a given target is exploding. Therefore, a genetic system to identify degradation-causing E3 ligases and suitable target/E3 ligase pairs is urgently needed. Here, we used the well-established dimerization of the FKBP12 protein and FRB domain by rapamycin to bring the target protein WDR5 into proximity with candidate E3 ligases. Strikingly, this rapamycin-induced proximity assay (RiPA) revealed that VHL, but not Cereblon, is able to induce WDR5 degradation - a finding previously made by PROTACs, demonstrating its predictive power. By optimizing the steric arrangement of all components and fusing the target protein with a minimal luciferase, RiPA can identify the ideal E3 for any target protein of interest in living cells, significantly reducing and focusing the chemical effort in the early stages of PROTAC development.